Literature DB >> 30166926

Preparation and activity of glycosylated acetylsalicylic acid.

Gangliang Huang1, Hao Cheng1, Yang Liu1, Jinchuan Hu1.   

Abstract

The glycosylated n class="Chemical">acetylsalicylic acid was prepared with bromo-α-n class="Chemical">d-galactose and acetylsalicylic acid. It indicated that the glycosylated acetylsalicylic acid had lower cytotoxicity than underivatized acetylsalicylic acid, and might selectively display anticancer activity in this situation that had enzyme or no enzyme.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetylsalicylic acid; Anticancer activity; Cytotoxicity; Glycosylated; Preparation

Year:  2017        PMID: 30166926      PMCID: PMC6111454          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2017.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi Pharm J        ISSN: 1319-0164            Impact factor:   4.330


Introduction

n class="Chemical">Acetylsalicylic acid, also known as n class="Chemical">aspirin, is a antipyretic analgesic with a long history. We all know that this medicine can be used to treat colds, fever, headaches, toothache, joint pain, and rheumatism. It also can inhibit platelet aggregation, prevent and treat ischemic heart disease, cardiopulmonary infarction, cerebral thrombosis and other diseases (De and Renda, 2012). In addition, it has shown that acetylsalicylic acid has anti-cancer effect (Rothwell et al., 2012). The US working group for preventive services has issued a guide that acetylsalicylic acid can be used as the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and colorectal cancer. The guideline proposed for the first time that high-risk groups of non-colorectal cancer could use acetylsalicylic acid for primary prevention of colorectal cancer (Mora and Manson, 2016). It indicated that taking a certain dose of acetylsalicylic acid daily might effectively block the growth of breast cancer (Mc Menamin et al., 2017). Moreover, acetylsalicylic acid may have a certain inhibitory effect on colon cancer (Voora et al., 2016), gastrointestinal cancer (Jankowska et al., 2010), prostate cancer (Choe et al., 2012) and other cancers. Glycosylation modifications are widely found in natural products, such as clinical antibiotic n class="Chemical">erythromycin, antiparasitic insecticide avermectins, and antin class="Disease">cancer drug doxorubicin, which are with glycosylation modification (Huang and Mei, 2014). Glycosylation can improve the water solubility of drug, reduce toxicity and improve the activity. Moreover, it usually directly involves in the interaction of drug with the target. The activity of deglycosylated drug will be greatly affected. So, the glycosylation modification of drug plays an important role in biological activity (Huang et al., 2016). In addition, because anticancer drugs lack selectivity, tumor chemotherapy has serious side-effects. An ideal solution to the problem is the antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (ADEPT) and the prodrug monotherapy (PMT) (Tietze and Schmuck, 2011). Using the principle of McAb orientation, the specific activating enzyme for prodrug is crosslinked and selectively bound to the tumor site. The prodrug can be specifically transformed into active molecule in tumor tissues, which effectively solves the problems of low concentration in tumor tissues and damage to normal tissues for drug. This prodrug design is called ADEPT. PMT method is to make anticancer drug into a prodrug containing enzyme substrate structure, and release the drug under the special enzyme action of cancer cells to play a therapeutic role. So far, there has been no report on the modification of acetylsalicylic acid by glycosylation. Therefore, we try to carry out research work in this area. d-galactose can be used as a vector for prodrug design (Melisi et al., 2011). So, this galactosylated acetylsalicylic acid prodrug was prepared in four-step reaction. The inhibitory activity of acetylsalicylic acid and its galactosylated prodrug was tested. In addition, their anticancer activity to cancer cells was also assayed by ADEPT and PMT.

Experimental method

Preparation of peracetylated d-galactose 2

The n class="Chemical">acetic anhydride (70 mL) n class="Chemical">d-galactose (5 g) was slowly added to the reaction bottle. Then, 70 mL of anhydrous pyridine was added under stirring. This reaction was lasted for 20 h at 25 °C. After the reaction was complete, the reaction mixture was poured into ice water, which was fully stirred until room temperature. After filtration, The crude product was recrystallized with water/methanol (v/v = 1/2). Peracetylated -galactose 2 Yield: 92%; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.34 (d, 1Hα, J12 1.5 Hz, H-1α), 5.63 (d, 1Hβ, J12 1.5 Hz, H-1β), 5.50 (dd, 1H, J34 < 1.0 Hz, J45 1.3 Hz, H-4), 5.34–5.29 (m, 2H, H-2, H-3), 4.31 (dt, 1H, J56 6.5 Hz, H-5), 4.16–4.01 (m, 2H, H-6a, H-6b), 2.14, 2.10, 2.00, 1.98, 1.97, 1.96 (all s, 15H, 10 × C(O)CH3); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.8, 170.5, 170.3, 169.3, 167.5 (5 × CO), 102.0 (C-1β), 101.5 (C-1α), 68.8 (C-5), 68.0 (C-3 and C-4), 66.6 (C-2), 61.5 (C-6), 21.3, 21.1, 20.9, 20.8, 20.6 (5 × C(O)CH3); ESI-MS: m/z = 413.3397 [M + Na]+.

Preparation of α-d-galactopyranosyl bromide 4

The peracetylated n class="Chemical">galactose 2 (5 g, 12.8 mmol) was added into the reaction bottle. Then 50 mL of n class="Chemical">hydrogen bromide-acetic acid (33%) was added dropwise at 0 °C. After reaction for 2 h at 25 °C, 150 mL of CH2Cl2 was added. The mixture was washed with ice water, and the organic layer was dried with a desiccant (MgSO4). After vacuum distillation, peracetylated α-galactosyl bromide 3 was provided in the yield of 97%. Compound 3 was hydrolyzed with 20 mL of dilute HBr solution (1 mol/L) for 2 h at 25 °C to produce α-d-galactopyranosyl bromide 4, and the yield was 90%. α--Galactopyranosyl bromide 4 1H NMR (300 MHz, D2O): δ 6.79 (d, 1H, J12 3.6 Hz, H-1), 5.42 (dd, 1H, J34 3.2 Hz, J45 1.2 Hz, H-4), 5.21 (dd, 1H, J23 10.4 Hz, H-3), 5.00 (dd, 1H, H-2), 4.33 (m, 1H, H-5), 4.15 (dd, 1H, J6a6b 11.6 Hz, J56 6.0 Hz, H-6a), 3.99 (dd, 1H, J5,6b 6.8 Hz, H-6b); 13C NMR (75 MHz, D2O): δ 102.3 (C-1), 70.4 (C-5), 66.3, 66.0 (C-3/C-4), 64.9 (C-2), 59.9 (C-6).

Preparation of galactosylated acetylsalicylic acid prodrug 5

The 30 mL of anhydrous n class="Chemical">dimethyl sulfoxide was added to reaction bottle, and the temperature was adjusted to 40 °C. 5 mmol of α-d-galactopyranosyl bromide 4, 5.3 mmol of n class="Chemical">acetylsalicylic acid and 5.3 mmol of triethylamine were sequentially added to the reaction bottle. The reaction was lasted for 5 h at 40 °C. After the reaction was finished, a slurry was produced under the reduced pressure. The slurry was dissolved using anhydrous ethanol, and cooled with ice salt water. The crude product was recrystallized with absolute alcohol to obtain galactosylated acetylsalicylic acid prodrug 5 in the yield of 80%. Galactosylated acetylsalicylic acid prodrug 5 IR(KBr): v (cm−1) 2939 (C—H), 1755 (CO), 1605, 1486, 1450 (Ph), 1223 (C—O), 1073 (C—O—C), 918 (β-Galactosidic bond), 752 (Two adjacent substituents on benzene ring); 1H NMR (300 MHz, D2O): δ 7.09–8.03 (4m, 4H, ArH), 5.89–5.86 (d, 1H, J = 7.73 Hz, Hβ-1), 5.34–5.27 (m, 2H, H-2, H-3), 5.24–5.16 (q, 1H, H-4), 4.35–4.29 (q, 1H, H-6), 4.13–4.12 (d, 1H, H-6′), 4.08–3.88 (q, 1H, H-5), 3.84 (s, 3H, —OCOCH3); 13C NMR (75 MHz, D2O): δ 167.0, 168.0 (CO), 121.3–154.3(Ph), 102.9 (C-1), 70.2 (C-5), 66.1, 66.0 (C-3/C-4), 64.7 (C-2), 59.6 (C-6), 16.9 (CH3); HRMS: m/z = 365.1028 [M + Na]+.

Cell culture

The cell line n class="CellLine">A549 of n class="Disease">lung adenocarcinoma was cultured in the nutrient fluid of RPMI-1640, and then it was cultured with 5% CO2 at 37 °C in incubator.

MTT colorimetric assay

The n class="CellLine">A549 cells, which were in logarithmic growth phase, were seeded in 96 well plates for 5 × 103 cells per hole. The culture medium was displaced after one day, the experimental group (sample with different concentrations), blank withered group (not inoculated for cells) and control group (solvent only with the same amount) were designed. Every group had four holes. 20 μL of MTT was added into every hole after two days. The herceptin-galactosidase conjugate was prepared according to reference (Pritsch et al., 2009). After the cultivation was lasted for 4 h in the absence or in the presence of β-d-galactoside galactohydrolase, they were centrifuged at 1000 r/min for 5 min, and the supernatant was removed. 100 μL of dimethyl sulfoxide was added into every hole, and they were gently shaken for 10 min. The absorbance (A) in every hole was measured at 570 nm with the Microplate Reader. The inhibition rate to cancer cell was calculated: the inhibition rate = (1 − the average value of all A values for experimental group/the average value of all A values for control group) × 100%.

Results and discussion

Since the n class="Chemical">peracetylated monosaccharide is often used as a substrate molecule for subsequent synthesis, it is particularly important to control the terminal group configuration of n class="Chemical">peracetylated monosaccharide in the synthesis. Generally, this configuration constraint can be achieved by two methods: dynamic control and thermodynamic control. The β-configuration products are controlled by kinetics. The catalyst type, reaction temperature, feed operation and other factors can affect the rate of acetylation. So, the peracetylated monosaccharide, which has a certain α-product under dynamic control conditions, can generally be separated by recrystallization or column chromatography. The α-configuration products are thermodynamically controlled. In practice, Lewis acid or proton acid is often used as a catalyst, the resulting peracetylated monosaccharide is subjected to repeated removal and reintroduction of the terminal oxyacetyl groups, and the resulting β-sugar is converted to α-sugar. Thereby, peracetylated α-sugar with a single configuration is finally produced. Here, the configuration of peracetylated monosaccharide does not affect the subsequent reaction. So, the mixture with α/β configuration was obtained. The peracetylated galactose 2 was prepared with galactose 1 and acetic anhydride using pyridine as catalyst (Fig. 1). The reaction conditions were as follows: n(galactose)/n(acetic anhydride) = 1/26, M(catalyst)/M(galactose) = 13/1, time = 20 h, and temperature = 25 °C. The yield was greater than 92%, and n(peracetylated α-galactose)/n(peracetylated β-galactose) = 3.2/1.
Fig. 1

Preparation of galactosylated acetylsalicylic acid prodrug 5.

Preparation of n class="Chemical">galactosylated acetylsalicylic acid prodrug 5. The peracetylated n class="Chemical">galactose 2 was reacted with n class="Chemical">hydrogen bromide-acetic acid (33 wt%) under stirring, time = 2 h, and temperature = 25 °C, the peracetylated α-d-galactopyranosyl bromide 3 was produced, and the yield was 97%. The peracetylated α-bromide 3 was hydrolyzed with dilute HBr solution under stirring, time = 1 h, and temperature = 25 °C, and α-D-galactopyranosyl bromide 4 was provided in 90% yield (Fig. 1). n class="Chemical">Acetylsalicylic acid was reacted with n class="Chemical">triethylamine to produce the corresponding salt with pH = 7. The deprotected α-D-galactopyranosyl bromide 4 was reacted with the above-mentioned acetylsalicylic acid salt in anhydrous dimethyl sulfoxide, time = 5 h, temperature = 40 °C, and the target compound galactosylated acetylsalicylic acid prodrug 5 was offered. The yield was about 80% (Fig. 1). The cell line n class="CellLine">A549 of n class="Species">human lung adenocarcinoma was dealt with acetylsalicylic acid, and its concentration was changed from 1.25 to 20 mmol/L. After 48 h, the inhibition rate to cancer cell was ranged from 3.8 to 63.9%, which presented a dose-dependent pattern. However, the inhibition rate to cancer cell treated with galactose-acetylsalicylic acid conjugate prodrug was ranged from 6.3 to 90.2% under the same conditions by ADEPT in the presence of β-d-galactoside galactohydrolase. Moreover, ADEPT was better than PMT. The related results were revealed in Table 1. Therefore, it proved that the galactosylation of acetylsalicylic acid could enhance its inhibitory activity against the proliferation of cancer cells by ADEPT and PMT.
Table 1

The anticancer activity of acetylsalicylic acid and galactosylated acetylsalicylic acid prodrug (n = 5).

CompoundAnticancer activity (1.25–20 mmol/L)
Acetylsalicylic acid3.8–63.9%
Galactosylated acetylsalicylic acid conjugate (ADEPT)6.3–90.2%
Galactosylated acetylsalicylic acid conjugate (PMT)4.5–71.8%
The antin class="Disease">cancer activity of n class="Chemical">acetylsalicylic acid and galactosylated acetylsalicylic acid prodrug (n = 5). The IC50 of prodrug 5 and free n class="Chemical">acetylsalicylic acid was 1256.83 and 11.30 mmol/L, respectively, In the presence of β-d-galactoside galactohydrolase, the n class="Disease">cytotoxicity of prodrug 5 was restored to that of the free acetylsalicylic acid. The ratio of cytotoxicity between the prodrug and the free drug was 111 (Table 2). These value is compatible with ADEPT or PMT strategy where a relatively non-cytotoxic prodrug releases a cytotoxic compound.
Table 2

The cytotoxicity of acetylsalicylic acid and galactosylated acetylsalicylic acid prodrug (n = 5).

CompoundIC50 (mmol/L)
Acetylsalicylic acid11.30 ± 0.16*
Galactosylated acetylsalicylic acid prodrug1256.83 ± 0.10*

p < .05.

The n class="Disease">cytotoxicity of n class="Chemical">acetylsalicylic acid and galactosylated acetylsalicylic acid prodrug (n = 5). p < .05.

Conclusion

The n class="Chemical">galactosylated acetylsalicylic acid prodrug 5 was efficiently prepared by a four-step reaction. The preparation method was easy to operate and the yield was high. Moreover, the galactosylation of n class="Chemical">acetylsalicylic acid could enhance its anticancer activity by ADEPT or PMT in the presence or in the absence of β-d-galactoside galactohydrolase.

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Prodrugs for targeted tumor therapies: recent developments in ADEPT, GDEPT and PMT.

Authors:  Lutz F Tietze; Kianga Schmuck
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 2.  Clinical use of aspirin in ischemic heart disease: past, present and future.

Authors:  Raffaele De Caterina; Giulia Renda
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.116

3.  Low-dose aspirin use and survival in breast cancer patients: A nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Úna C Mc Menamin; Chris R Cardwell; Carmel M Hughes; Liam J Murray
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 4.  D-galactose as a vector for prodrug design.

Authors:  Daniela Melisi; Annalisa Curcio; Elvira Luongo; Elena Morelli; Maria Grazia Rimoli
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Samia Mora; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 6.  Glycosylation and Activities of Natural Products.

Authors:  Gangliang Huang; Meijiao Lv; Jinchuan Hu; Kunlin Huang; Hong Xu
Journal:  Mini Rev Med Chem       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.862

Review 7.  Aspirin chemoprevention of gastrointestinal cancer in the next decade. A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Helena Jankowska; Patricia Hooper; Janusz A Jankowski
Journal:  Pol Arch Med Wewn       Date:  2010-10

8.  Aspirin use and the risk of prostate cancer mortality in men treated with prostatectomy or radiotherapy.

Authors:  Kevin S Choe; Janet E Cowan; June M Chan; Peter R Carroll; Anthony V D'Amico; Stanley L Liauw
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Effect of daily aspirin on risk of cancer metastasis: a study of incident cancers during randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Peter M Rothwell; Michelle Wilson; Jacqueline F Price; Jill F F Belch; Tom W Meade; Ziyah Mehta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Systems Pharmacogenomics Finds RUNX1 Is an Aspirin-Responsive Transcription Factor Linked to Cardiovascular Disease and Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Deepak Voora; A Koneti Rao; Gauthami S Jalagadugula; Rachel Myers; Emily Harris; Thomas L Ortel; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2016-08-14       Impact factor: 8.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.