| Literature DB >> 30166916 |
Muneera S Al-Saleem1, Amani S Awaad2, Monerah R Alothman3, Saleh I Alqasoumi4.
Abstract
The phytochemical screening, antimicrobial and antitumor activities of Calendula tripterocarpa, Centarea sinaica, Centaurea pseudosinaica, Koelpinia linearis, Plectranthus arabicus, Plectranthus asirensis and Tripleurospermum auriculatum determined. The best antibacterial activity; 41.8 ± 0.23 mm, 39.7 ± 0.25 mm, 35.8 ± 0.58 mm, 34.7 ± 0.51 mm and 32.7 ± 0.25 mm was obtained by Plectranthus arabicus against Klebsiella pneumonia, Tripleurospermum auriculatum against Bacillus subtilis, Centaurea pseudosinaica against Bacillus subtilis, Centaurea pseudosinaica against Stroptococcus pyogenes and Plectranthus arabicus against Staphylococcus epidermidis, respectively. While the highest antifungal activity; 35.9 ± 1.15 mm, 34.6 ± 0.34, 30.6 ± 0.26 mm and 29.9 ± 0.63 mm was obtained by Tripleurospermum auriculatum against Geotricum candidum, Candida albicans, C. tropicalis and Aspergillus fumigatus, respectively. The antitumor activity (IC50) obtained by Centarea sinaica; 3.1 ± 6.9 µg/ml, 14.3 ± 3.1 µg/ml and 22.7 ± 4.1 µg/ml was better than activity of vinblastine sulphate; 5.9 ± 0.4 µg/ml, 59.7 ± 2.1 µg/ml and 30.3 ± 1.4 µg/ml against breast carcinoma (MCF-7), cervical carcinoma (Hela) and colorectal carcinoma (CACO), respectively. Plectranthus arabicus alcoholic extract showed higher antitumor activity; 15.3 ± 5.3 µg/ml, 28.6 ± 3.6 µg/ml and 24.3 ± 4.1 µg/ml than vinblastine; 21.2 ± 0.9 µg/ml, 59.7 ± 2.1 µg/ml and 30.3 ± 1.4 µg/ml against prostate carcinoma (Pc3), cervical carcinoma (Hela) and colorectal carcinoma (CACO), respectively. Also, the antitumor activity of Plectranthus asirensis against cervical carcinoma (Hela) (37.1 ± 2.6 µg/ml) was potent than vinblastine sulphate (59.7 ± 2.1 µg/ml). The obtained results of LD50 and sub-chronic toxicity revealed that the plants have no toxicity.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-microbial; Antitumor; Medicinal plants; Phytochemical contents; Sub-chronic toxicity
Year: 2017 PMID: 30166916 PMCID: PMC6111233 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2017.12.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi Pharm J ISSN: 1319-0164 Impact factor: 4.330
Qualitative phytochemical analysis of the investigated plants.
| Test | Plant | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sterols and/or triterpenes | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Cardinolides | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Carbohydrates and/or glycosides | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Flavonoides | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Tannins | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Saponins | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Anthraquinones | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Alkaloides and/or nitrogenous bases | + | + | + | + | ± | ± | + |
| Protein and/or amino acids | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
(+) present, (−) absence, (±) trace.
Quantitative phytochemical analysis of the investigated plants.
| Plant | Total alcohol | Moisture | Total ash | Acid insoluble ash | Water soluble ash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16.57 ± 1.11 | 5.17 ± 1.23 | 9.32 ± 1.13 | 2.15 ± 1.27 | 6.12 ± 1.34 | |
| 17.34 ± 1.56 | 7.14 ± 1.11 | 8.14 ± 1.37 | 3.11 ± 1.32 | 5.21 ± 1.15 | |
| 18.17 ± 1.34 | 6.87 ± 1.99 | 9.65 ± 1.61 | 3.87 ± 1.71 | 6.47 ± 1.78 | |
| 15.37 ± 1.76 | 8.98 ± 2.19 | 10.348 ± 1.54 | 4.19 ± 1.36 | 8.58 ± 1.63 | |
| 19.70 ± 1.29 | 9.77 ± 2.43 | 8.35 ± 1.22 | 3.16 ± 1.23 | 5.22 ± 1.54 | |
| 17.55 ± 1.41 | 10.15 ± 2.21 | 9.14 ± 1.37 | 3.33 ± 1.34 | 5.28 ± 1.42 | |
| 18.45 ± 1.49 | 11.25 ± 2.33 | 8.74 ± 1.66 | 2.13 ± 1.57 | 6.18 ± 1.49 |
Values are the mean of triplicates ± standard deviation.
Total percentage of the phytochemical constituents of the investigated plants.
| Plant | Chemical group% | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbohydrate | Lipid | Protein | Alkaloids | Flavonoids | Phenolic compounds | Tannins | |
| 6.77 ± 1.2 | 10.15 ± 1.2 | 7.21 ± 1.8 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 3.45 ± 1.2 | 11.22 ± 1.7 | 8.28 ± 1.1 | |
| 8.13 ± 1.4 | 11.15 ± 1.13 | 8.59 ± 1.7 | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 2.35 ± 2.1 | 10.31 ± 1.4 | 10.26 ± 0.9 | |
| 7.63 ± 1.9 | 9.15 ± 1.7 | 9.67 ± 1.9 | 0.04 ± 0.9 | 4.15 ± 1.7 | 12.25 ± 1.6 | 7.56 ± 1.8 | |
| 6.43 ± 1.3 | 11.23 ± 1.4 | 6.98 ± 1.2 | 0.05 ± 0.1 | 3.18 ± 1.7 | 13.46 ± 1.6 | 9.33 ± 1.4 | |
| 6.83 ± 1.9 | 9.21 ± 1.5 | 7.32 ± 1.5 | 0.06 ± 0.4 | 5.19 ± 1.4 | 13.11 ± 1.7 | 8.15 ± 0.7 | |
| 8.92 ± 1.2 | 10.43 ± 1.9 | 6.16 ± 1.9 | 0.09 ± 0.2 | 4.89 ± 1.9 | 14.13 ± 1.4 | 7.22 ± 1.15 | |
| 9.81 ± 1.5 | 9.81 ± 1.5 | 8.76 ± 1.3 | 0.06 ± 0.7 | 3.16 ± 1.8 | 12.14 ± 1.3 | 9.21 ± 1.15 | |
Values are the mean of triplicates ± standard deviation.
Antimicrobial activity of ethanol extracts of the investigated plants.
| Test organism | Plant | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter of the inhibition zone (mm) | ||||||||
| 24.2 ± 0.13 | 17.4 ± 0.17 | 23.6 ± 0.19 | 17.2 ± 0.33 | 22.9 ± 0.25 | 20.4 ± 0.25 | 24.3 ± 0.58 | 25.9 ± 0.3 | |
| 15.3 ± 0.14 | 24.8 ± 0.03 | 17.6 ± 0.29 | 15.1 ± 0.44 | 41.8 ± 0.23 | 27.7 ± 0.25 | 16.1 ± 0.35 | 32.3 ± 0.15 | |
| 14.8 ± 0.13 | 21.2 ± 0.14 | 16.1 ± 0.26 | 13.4 ± 0.13 | 28.9 ± 0.44 | 24.9 ± 0.44 | 17.2 ± 0.12 | 26.3 ± 0.3 | |
| 21.7 ± 0.36 | 16.3 ± 0.32 | 18.3 ± 0.25 | 12.2 ± 0.32 | 18.3 ± 0.32 | 11.7 ± 0.43 | 19.1 ± 0.32 | 23.3 ± 0.1 | |
| 17.2 ± 0.16 | 19.4 ± 0.14 | 11.9 ± 0.17 | 19.7 ± 0.57 | 29.6 ± 0.44 | 21.4 ± 0.39 | 14.1 ± 0.22 | 33.6 ± 0.15 | |
| Gram positive | ||||||||
| 14.4 ± 0.19 | 25.2 ± 0.27 | 35.8 ± 0.58 | 23.4 ± 0.53 | 31.6 ± 0.63 | 29.7 ± 0.63 | 39.7 ± 0.25 | 38.4 ± 0.3 | |
| 12.1 ± 0.19 | 17.7 ± 0.26 | 25.5 ± 0.44 | 21.0 ± 0.43 | 32.7 ± 0.25 | 26.2 ± 0.55 | 14.1 ± 0.24 | 31.2 ± 0.18 | |
| 31.0 ± 0.53 | 15.7 ± 0.36 | 19.5 ± 0.64 | 19.0 ± 1.14 | 23.3 ± 0.44 | 28.4 ± 0.58 | 15.8 ± 0.14 | 34.3 ± 0.32 | |
| 10.8 ± 1.21 | 22.7 ± 0.36 | 25.5 ± 0.44 | 20.0 ± 0.32 | 26.3 ± 0.17 | 25.6 ± 0.44 | 26.6 ± 0.34 | 29.8 ± 0.2 | |
| 13.4 ± 0.13 | 16.2 ± 0.23 | 34.7 ± 0.51 | 23.4 ± 0.21 | 27.6 ± 0.36 | 22.3 ± 0.25 | 19.2 ± 0.21 | 32.4 ± 0.31 | |
| 21.7 ± 0.36 | 22.8 ± 0.39 | 28.3 ± 0.15 | 17.3 ± 0.34 | 27.3 ± 0.39 | 26.4 ± 0.39 | 29.9 ± 0.63 | 29.7 ± 1.11 | |
| 19.3 ± 0.13 | 21.9 ± 0.43 | 29.5 ± 0.32 | 14.1 ± 1.21 | 27.6 ± 0.58 | 25.1 ± 0.23 | 34.6 ± 0.34 | 31.4 ± 0.38 | |
| 26.6 ± 0.54 | 22.7 ± 0.33 | 28.4 ± 0.36 | 17.6 ± 0.58 | 26.4 ± 0.53 | 21.6 ± 1.31 | 30.6 ± 0.26 | 28.2 ± 0.34 | |
| 23.3 ± 0.48 | 25.6 ± 0.19 | 31.8 ± 0.68 | 20.3 ± 0.38 | 28.6 ± 0.58 | 27.4 ± 1.28 | 35.9 ± 1.15 | 34.7 ± 0.27 | |
| 17.2 ± 0.33 | 19.4 ± 0.58 | 22.5 ± 0.27 | 18.1 ± 1.25 | 20.2 ± 0.16 | 17.3 ± 0.58 | 24.6 ± 1.27 | 25.7 ± 0.12 | |
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ethanol extracts of the investigated plants.
| Plant test organism | Minimum inhibitory concentration (µg/ml) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard antibiotic | ||||||||
| 3.9 | 31.25 | 3.9 | 62.5 | 3.9 | 15.63 | 62.5 | 0.24 | |
| 125 | 3.9 | 62.5 | 250 | 0.48 | 0.97 | 125 | 0.12 | |
| 250 | 15.63 | 31.25 | 500 | 7.81 | 7.81 | 31.25 | 0.24 | |
| 15.63 | 31.25 | 31.25 | 500 | 15.63 | 1000 | 15.63 | 1.95 | |
| 250 | 250 | 1000 | 125 | 15.63 | 62.5 | 125 | 0.24 | |
| Gram positive | ||||||||
| 62.5 | 15.63 | 0.03 | 31.25 | 0.48 | 0.97 | 0.03 | 0.007 | |
| 31.25 | 15.63 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 0.98 | 3.9 | 31.25 | 0.24 | |
| 0.98 | 15.63 | 1.95 | 1.95 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 31.25 | 0.24 | |
| 500 | 31.25 | 7.81 | 125 | 7.81 | 7.81 | 7.81 | 0.98 | |
| 62.5 | 31.25 | 0.03 | 3.9 | 1.95 | 3.9 | 7.8 | 0.24 | |
| 15.63 | 15.63 | 1.95 | 62.5 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 1.95 | 0.98 | |
| 62.5 | 31.25 | 1.95 | 250 | 1.95 | 3.9 | 0.98 | 0.48 | |
| 1.95 | 3.9 | 0.98 | 31.25 | 1.95 | 15.63 | 0.98 | 0.24 | |
| 7.8 | 7.8 | 0.98 | 15.63 | 0.98 | 1.95 | 0.24 | 0.03 | |
| 250 | 62.5 | 31.25 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 125 | 15.63 | 7.8 | |
The IC50 values of the investigated plants on different cell lines.
| PlantCell line | IC50 (µg/ml) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-549 (Lung carcinoma) | CACO (colorectal carcinoma) | HCT-116 (Colon carcinoma) | Hela (Cervical carcinoma) | HepG-2 (Hepatocellular carcinoma) | MCF-7 (Breast carcinoma) | Pc3 (Prostate carcinoma) | |
| Vinblastine Sulphate | 24.6 ± 0.7 | 30.3 ± 1.4 | 3.5 ± 0.2 | 59.7 ± 2.1 | 2.93 ± 0.3 | 5.9 ± 0.4 | 21.2 ± 0.9 |
| 157 ± 8.2 | 130 ± 4.2 | 28.6 ± 2.8 | 77.6 ± 2.4 | 56.1 ± 0.3 | 46.4 ± 0.3 | 132 ± 1.4 | |
| 32.6 ± 3.4 | 22.7 ± 4.1 | 5.5 ± 1.9 | 14.3 ± 3.1 | 3.8 ± 1.6 | 3.1 ± 6.9 | 28.5 ± 2.4 | |
| Centarea pseudosinaica | 56.7 ± 0.5 | 78.6 ± 3.6 | 18.6 ± 0.8 | 87.5 ± 1.7 | 10.2 ± 2.1 | 15.3 ± 1.6 | 52.9 ± 3.2 |
| 68.2 ± 5.9 | 112 ± 5.4 | 35.8 ± 3.3 | 89.3 ± 2.4 | 24.3 ± 1.5 | 19.6 ± 1.4 | 144 ± 4.4 | |
| 30.7 ± 2.4 | 24.3 ± 4.1 | 10.6 ± 2.3 | 28.6 ± 3.6 | 7.1 ± 2.6 | 12.7 ± 2.1 | 15.3 ± 5.3 | |
| 156 ± 5.2 | 174 ± 4.2 | 500 < | 37.1 ± 2.6 | 500 < | 13.2 ± 0.1 | 500 < | |
| Tripleuro-spermum auriculatum | 42.7 ± 6.2 | 48.1 ± 1.6 | 19.9 ± 2.3 | 85.5 ± 1.2 | 8.7 ± 1.9 | 10.3 ± 0.9 | 48.2 ± 2.9 |
Values are the mean of triplicates ± standard deviation.
Effect of the total alcohol extracts of plants under investigations on liver and kidney functions.
| Plant | Parameter | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | Total protein (g/dL) | Albumin (g/dL) | Urea (mg/dL) | Creatine (mg/dL) | |
| Control | 63.33 ± 2.4 | 48.90 ± 2.2 | 1.70 ± 0.1 | 8.20 ± 0.3 | 3.7 ± 0 | 35.06 ± 2.3 | 0.43 ± 0.7 |
| 64.30 ± 2.5 | 49.40 ± 2.5 | 1.61 ± 0.3 | 8.90 ± 0. 4 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 36.13 ± 2.1 | 0.61 ± 0.6 | |
| 65.10 ± 2.1 | 48.62 ± 2.2 | 1.83 ± 0.4 | 8.65 ± 0.2 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 34.23 ± 2.1 | 0.53 ± 0.4 | |
| 63.30 ± 2.5 | 50.10 ± 2.2 | 1.68 ± 0.2 | 8.87 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.7 | 34.85 ± 2.5 | 0.52 ± 0.7 | |
| 64.30 ± 2.3 | 47.90 ± 2.8 | 1.69 ± 0.3 | 8.32 ± 0. 4 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 36.23 ± 2.1 | 0.61 ± 0.4 | |
| 64.10 ± 2.6 | 49.12 ± 2.2 | 1.71 ± 0.3 | 8.63 ± 0.5 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 35.98 ± 2.2 | 0.56 ± 0.4 | |
| 64.30 ± 2.5 | 50.40 ± 2.5 | 1.68 ± 0.2 | 8.54 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.8 | 36.65 ± 2.3 | 0.52 ± 0.6 | |
| 64.30 ± 2.5 | 50.40 ± 2.5 | 1.68 ± 0.2 | 8.54 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.8 | 36.65 ± 2.3 | 0.51 ± 0.9 | |