Literature DB >> 30166333

Venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patrick Nicholson1, Waleed Brinjikji1, Ivan Radovanovic2,3, Christopher Alan Hilditch1, Anderson Chun On Tsang1, Timo Krings1, Vitor Mendes Pereira1,2, Stéphanie Lenck1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stenting of the intracranial venous sinuses is used as a treatment in certain cases of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Interest in, and experience of, this technique is growing, particularly in recent years. We sought to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of venous stenting in these patients, examining clinical outcomes.
METHODS: A literature search of venous stenting in IIH patients was performed. Using random-effects meta-analysis, we evaluated the following outcomes: clinical resolution of papilledema; headaches and pulsatile tinnitus; recurrence of symptoms after stenting; and complications.
RESULTS: Twenty articles from 18 different centers were included. In a total of 474 patients. 418 were female (88%). The mean age of the patients was 35, while the mean body mass index (BMI) was 35 kg/m2. Median follow-up was 18 months. The overall rate of improvement in papilloedema was 93.7% (95% CI 90.5% to 96.9%), while the overall rate of improvement or resolution of headache was 79.6% (95% CI 73.3% to 85.9%). Pulsatile tinnitus resolved in 90.3% (95% CI 83.8% to 96.70%), while the overall rate of recurrence of IIH symptoms after stenting was 9.8% (95% CI 6.7% to 13%). The rate of major complications was 1.9% (95% CI 0.07% to 3.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: Venous sinus stenting in patients with IIH who are refractory to medical therapy appears to have an excellent safety profile and is associated with significant improvements in headaches, pulsatile tinnitus, and papilledema. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  headache; idiopathic intracranial hypertension; papilledema; stent; vein

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30166333     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  27 in total

1.  Stenting of symptomatic lateral sinus thrombosis refractory to mechanical thrombectomy.

Authors:  Guangdong Lu; Jae Ho Shin; Yunsun Song; Deok Hee Lee
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Contralateral approach to transverse-sigmoid sinus stenting.

Authors:  Weston Gordon; Michael Abraham
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Single arm access venous sinus stenting (SAVeS) technique: Technical note.

Authors:  Alexander D Ramos; Sri Sundararajan; Alejandro Santillan; Justin T Schwarz; Athos Patsalides
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  Dynamic nature of intracranial venous sinuses in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Patrick Nicholson; Stéphanie Lenck; Walter Kucharczyk; Vitor Mendes-Pereira
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension with stenosis of a solitary occipital venous sinus treated with stenting.

Authors:  Ali Al Balushi; Cristiano Oliveira; Athos Patsalides
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  Long-term Kinetic Papilledema Improvement After Venous Sinus Stenting in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  Romain Touzé; Sophie Bonnin; Emmanuel Houdart; Patrick Nicholson; Bahram Bodaghi; Eimad Shotar; Frédéric Clarençon; Stéphanie Lenck; Valérie Touitou
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.649

7.  Headache, Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks, and Pseudomeningoceles after Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas: Efficacy of Venous Sinus Stenting Suggests Cranial Venous Outflow Compromise as a Unifying Pathophysiological Mechanism.

Authors:  J Nicholas Higgins; Robert Macfarlane; Patrick R Axon; Richard A Mannion; James R Tysome; Neil Donnelly; David A Moffat; John D Pickard
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-01-21

8.  Venous sinus stenting as a treatment approach in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and encephaloceles.

Authors:  Gerald T Drocton; Alexander Copelan; Laura Eisenmenger; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; William P Dillon; Vinil N Shah; Karl Meisel; Matthew Amans
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 1.610

9.  A proposed framework for cerebral venous congestion.

Authors:  Anirudh Arun; Matthew R Amans; Nicholas Higgins; Waleed Brinjikji; Mithun Sattur; Sudhakar R Satti; Peter Nakaji; Mark Luciano; Thierry Agm Huisman; Abhay Moghekar; Vitor M Pereira; Ran Meng; Kyle Fargen; Ferdinand K Hui
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-07-05

10.  Efficacy of dural venous sinus stenting in treating idiopathic intracranial hypertension with acute vision loss.

Authors:  Aqib H Zehri; Katriel E Lee; Jeff Kartchner; Madison Arnel; Timothy Martin; Stacey Q Wolfe; Kyle M Fargen
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.