Literature DB >> 30166246

Imaging cellular responses to antigen tagged DNA damage.

Marina A Bellani1, Jing Huang2, Manikandan Paramasivam1, Durga Pokharel1, Julia Gichimu1, Jing Zhang1, Michael M Seidman3.   

Abstract

Repair pathways of covalent DNA damage are understood in considerable detail due to decades of brilliant biochemical studies by many investigators. An important feature of these experiments is the defined adduct location on oligonucleotide or plasmid substrates that are incubated with purified proteins or cell free extracts. With some exceptions, this certainty is lost when the inquiry shifts to the response of living mammalian cells to the same adducts in genomic DNA. This reflects the limitation of assays, such as those based on immunofluorescence, that are widely used to follow responding proteins in cells exposed to a DNA reactive compound. The lack of effective reagents for adduct detection means that the proximity between responding proteins and an adduct must be assumed. Since these assumptions can be incorrect, models based on in vitro systems may fail to account for observations made in vivo. Here we discuss the use of a detection tag to address the problem of lesion location, as illustrated by our recent work on replication dependent and independent responses to interstrand crosslinks.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antigen tag; DNA damage response; Interstrand crosslink; Replication independent repair; Replication stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30166246      PMCID: PMC6340790          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.08.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  87 in total

1.  Structure of eukaryotic CMG helicase at a replication fork and implications to replisome architecture and origin initiation.

Authors:  Roxana Georgescu; Zuanning Yuan; Lin Bai; Ruda de Luna Almeida Santos; Jingchuan Sun; Dan Zhang; Olga Yurieva; Huilin Li; Michael E O'Donnell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Rescuing stalled or damaged replication forks.

Authors:  Joseph T P Yeeles; Jérôme Poli; Kenneth J Marians; Philippe Pasero
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  New insights into tumor dormancy: Targeting DNA repair pathways.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Evans; Shiaw-Yih Lin
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-10

4.  Connecting the Dots: Interplay between Ubiquitylation and SUMOylation at DNA Double-Strand Breaks.

Authors:  Jiang-Bo Tang; Roger A Greenberg
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2010-07

5.  Nucleotide excision repair proteins rapidly accumulate but fail to persist in human XP-E (DDB2 mutant) cells.

Authors:  Kyu-Seon Oh; Kyoko Imoto; Steffen Emmert; Deborah Tamura; John J DiGiovanna; Kenneth H Kraemer
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.421

6.  Deficiency in incisions produced by XPF at the site of a DNA interstrand cross-link in Fanconi anemia cells.

Authors:  Kandallu R Kumaresan; Deepa M Sridharan; Laura W McMahon; Muriel W Lambert
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  The structural basis for MCM2-7 helicase activation by GINS and Cdc45.

Authors:  Alessandro Costa; Ivar Ilves; Nele Tamberg; Tatjana Petojevic; Eva Nogales; Michael R Botchan; James M Berger
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 15.369

8.  Low level phosphorylation of histone H2AX on serine 139 (γH2AX) is not associated with DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Paulina Rybak; Agnieszka Hoang; Lukasz Bujnowicz; Tytus Bernas; Krzysztof Berniak; Mirosław Zarębski; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Jerzy Dobrucki
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-02

9.  Drosha drives the formation of DNA:RNA hybrids around DNA break sites to facilitate DNA repair.

Authors:  Wei-Ting Lu; Ben R Hawley; George L Skalka; Robert A Baldock; Ewan M Smith; Aldo S Bader; Michal Malewicz; Felicity Z Watts; Ania Wilczynska; Martin Bushell
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  A toolbox of anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgG secondary nanobodies.

Authors:  Tino Pleiner; Mark Bates; Dirk Görlich
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Replication-Coupled DNA Repair.

Authors:  David Cortez
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 17.970

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.