| Literature DB >> 30166246 |
Marina A Bellani1, Jing Huang2, Manikandan Paramasivam1, Durga Pokharel1, Julia Gichimu1, Jing Zhang1, Michael M Seidman3.
Abstract
Repair pathways of covalent DNA damage are understood in considerable detail due to decades of brilliant biochemical studies by many investigators. An important feature of these experiments is the defined adduct location on oligonucleotide or plasmid substrates that are incubated with purified proteins or cell free extracts. With some exceptions, this certainty is lost when the inquiry shifts to the response of living mammalian cells to the same adducts in genomic DNA. This reflects the limitation of assays, such as those based on immunofluorescence, that are widely used to follow responding proteins in cells exposed to a DNA reactive compound. The lack of effective reagents for adduct detection means that the proximity between responding proteins and an adduct must be assumed. Since these assumptions can be incorrect, models based on in vitro systems may fail to account for observations made in vivo. Here we discuss the use of a detection tag to address the problem of lesion location, as illustrated by our recent work on replication dependent and independent responses to interstrand crosslinks.Entities:
Keywords: Antigen tag; DNA damage response; Interstrand crosslink; Replication independent repair; Replication stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30166246 PMCID: PMC6340790 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.08.023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: DNA Repair (Amst) ISSN: 1568-7856