Literature DB >> 23637285

Rescuing stalled or damaged replication forks.

Joseph T P Yeeles1, Jérôme Poli, Kenneth J Marians, Philippe Pasero.   

Abstract

In recent years, an increasing number of studies have shown that prokaryotes and eukaryotes are armed with sophisticated mechanisms to restart stalled or collapsed replication forks. Although these processes are better understood in bacteria, major breakthroughs have also been made to explain how fork restart mechanisms operate in eukaryotic cells. In particular, repriming on the leading strand and fork regression are now established as critical for the maintenance and recovery of stalled forks in both systems. Despite the lack of conservation between the factors involved, these mechanisms are strikingly similar in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. However, they differ in that fork restart occurs in the context of chromatin in eukaryotes and is controlled by multiple regulatory pathways.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23637285      PMCID: PMC3632063          DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol        ISSN: 1943-0264            Impact factor:   10.005


  115 in total

1.  Modulation of RNA polymerase by (p)ppGpp reveals a RecG-dependent mechanism for replication fork progression.

Authors:  P McGlynn; R G Lloyd
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-03-31       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  DNA replication fidelity.

Authors:  Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Mcm10 plays an essential role in origin DNA unwinding after loading of the CMG components.

Authors:  Mai Kanke; Yukako Kodama; Tatsuro S Takahashi; Takuro Nakagawa; Hisao Masukata
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  A role for cell-cycle-regulated histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Hiroshi Masumoto; David Hawke; Ryuji Kobayashi; Alain Verreault
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Excess MCM proteins protect human cells from replicative stress by licensing backup origins of replication.

Authors:  Arkaitz Ibarra; Etienne Schwob; Juan Méndez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A postincision-deficient TFIIH causes replication fork breakage and uncovers alternative Rad51- or Pol32-mediated restart mechanisms.

Authors:  María Moriel-Carretero; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 7.  Timing and spacing of ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass.

Authors:  Helle D Ulrich
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 8.  Regulating DNA replication in plants.

Authors:  Maria de la Paz Sanchez; Celina Costas; Joana Sequeira-Mendes; Crisanto Gutierrez
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 9.  Recombinational repair and restart of damaged replication forks.

Authors:  Peter McGlynn; Robert G Lloyd
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 94.444

10.  Phosphorylation of Slx4 by Mec1 and Tel1 regulates the single-strand annealing mode of DNA repair in budding yeast.

Authors:  Sonja Flott; Constance Alabert; Geraldine W Toh; Rachel Toth; Neal Sugawara; David G Campbell; James E Haber; Philippe Pasero; John Rouse
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  129 in total

1.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecG protein but not RuvAB or RecA protein is efficient at remodeling the stalled replication forks: implications for multiple mechanisms of replication restart in mycobacteria.

Authors:  Roshan Singh Thakur; Shivakumar Basavaraju; Jasbeer Singh Khanduja; K Muniyappa; Ganesh Nagaraju
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Structural mechanisms of PriA-mediated DNA replication restart.

Authors:  Basudeb Bhattacharyya; Nicholas P George; Tiffany M Thurmes; Ruobo Zhou; Niketa Jani; Sarah R Wessel; Steven J Sandler; Taekjip Ha; James L Keck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Frequent Interchromosomal Template Switches during Gene Conversion in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Olga Tsaponina; James E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 4.  When proteins play tag: the dynamic nature of the replisome.

Authors:  Stefan H Mueller; Lisanne M Spenkelink; Antoine M van Oijen
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2019-07-04

Review 5.  Rescuing Replication from Barriers: Mechanistic Insights from Single-Molecule Studies.

Authors:  Bo Sun
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  Hypermutation in human cancer genomes: footprints and mechanisms.

Authors:  Steven A Roberts; Dmitry A Gordenin
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  WRNIP1 protects stalled forks from degradation and promotes fork restart after replication stress.

Authors:  Giuseppe Leuzzi; Veronica Marabitti; Pietro Pichierri; Annapaola Franchitto
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 8.  The Many Roles of PCNA in Eukaryotic DNA Replication.

Authors:  E M Boehm; M S Gildenberg; M T Washington
Journal:  Enzymes       Date:  2016-04-19

9.  The recombination mediator proteins RecFOR maintain RecA* levels for maximal DNA polymerase V Mut activity.

Authors:  Paromita Raychaudhury; Kenneth J Marians
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Delivering nonidentical twins.

Authors:  Thomas A Kunkel; Peter M Burgers
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 15.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.