Literature DB >> 30165241

Cross-dimensional magnitude interactions arise from memory interference.

Zhenguang G Cai1, Ruiming Wang2, Manqiong Shen3, Maarten Speekenbrink4.   

Abstract

Magnitudes from different dimensions (e.g., space and time) interact with each other in perception, but how these interactions occur remains unclear. In four experiments, we investigated whether cross-dimensional magnitude interactions arise from memory interference. In Experiment 1, participants perceived a constant-length line consisting of two line segments of complementary lengths and presented for a variable stimulus duration; then they received a cue about which of the two segment lengths to later reproduce. Participants were to first reproduce the stimulus duration and then the cued length. Reproduced durations increased as a function of the cued length if the cue was given before duration was retrieved from memory for reproduction (i.e. before duration reproduction; Experiment 1) but not if it was given after the duration memory had been retrieved from memory (i.e. after the start of duration reproduction; Experiment 2). These findings demonstrate that space-time interaction arises as a result of memory interference when length and duration information co-exist in working memory. Experiment 3 further demonstrated spatial interference on duration memories from memories of filled lengths (i.e. solid line segments) but not from noisier memories of unfilled lengths (demarcated empty spatial intervals), thus highlighting the role of memory noise in space-time interaction. Finally, Experiment 4 showed that time also exerted memory interference on space when space was presented as (relatively noisy) unfilled lengths. Taken together, these findings suggest that cross-dimensional magnitude interactions arise as a result of memory interference and the extent and direction of the interaction depend on the relative memory noises of the target and interfering dimensions. We propose a Bayesian model whereby the estimation of a magnitude is based on the integration of the noisily encoded percept of the target magnitude and the prior knowledge that magnitudes co-vary across dimensions (e.g., space and time). We discuss implications for cross-dimensional magnitude interactions in general.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian inference; Memory interference; Memory noise; Mental magnitude; Space-time interaction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30165241     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  The specious interaction of time and numerosity perception.

Authors:  Irene Togoli; Michele Fornaciai; Domenica Bueti
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Exploring spatiotemporal interactions: On the superiority of time over space.

Authors:  Kévin Vidaud-Laperrière; Lionel Brunel; Arielle Syssau-Vaccarella; Pom Charras
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 2.157

3.  The nature of magnitude integration: Contextual interference versus active magnitude binding.

Authors:  Irene Togoli; Domenica Bueti; Michele Fornaciai
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

4.  Cross-dimensional magnitude interaction is modulated by representational noise: evidence from space-time interaction.

Authors:  Zhenguang G Cai; Ruiming Wang
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-02-13

5.  The association of brightness with number/duration in human newborns.

Authors:  Cory D Bonn; Maria-Eirini Netskou; Arlette Streri; Maria Dolores de Hevia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Number-time interaction: Search for a common magnitude system in a cross-modal setting.

Authors:  Anuj Shukla; Raju S Bapi
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Can Implicit or Explicit Time Processing Impact Numerical Representation? Evidence From a Dual Task Paradigm.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Di Bono; Caterina Dapor; Simone Cutini; Konstantinos Priftis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.