Literature DB >> 30160523

Retrospective Analysis of 3-Month Real-World Glucose Data After the MiniMed 670G System Commercial Launch.

Michael P Stone1, Pratik Agrawal1, Xiaoxiao Chen1, Margaret Liu1, John Shin1, Toni L Cordero1, Francine R Kaufman1.   

Abstract

Real-world data from the first 3141 patients who completed 3 months of SmartGuard™ Auto Mode-enabled MiniMed™ 670G system use during the MiniMed 670G System Commercial Launch are reported. CareLink™ system data uploaded by real-world patients in the Commercial Launch from March 17, 2017 to December 31, 2017 were deidentified and analyzed. Comparisons of overall and night (10:00 PM-07:00 AM) time spent below, within, and above target glucose range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL) between the baseline Manual Mode and closed-loop Auto Mode periods were made. These were evaluated alongside data from the 124 patients (aged 14-75 years) who completed the 3-month MiniMed 670G system pivotal trial (NCT 2463097), from June 2, 2015 to March 7, 2016. Real-world patients used Auto Mode a median 80.8% of the time (19 h and 24 min of the day). The overall mean of time spent in TIR was 66.0% during baseline Manual Mode versus 73.3% during Auto Mode (P < 0.001); the mean percentage of sensor glucose values <70 mg/dL was 2.7% versus 2.1% (P < 0.001); and that >180 mg/dL was 31.4% versus 24.6% (P < 0.001). The nighttime and early morning (03:00 AM-06:00 AM) TIR during Auto Mode was greater than that during baseline Manual Mode (nighttime: 77.2% vs. 67.4% [P < 0.001], early morning: 70.9% vs. 84.6% [P < 0.001]). Similar differences between Manual Mode and Auto Mode TIR were observed across different age groups. A slight increase in total insulin delivered was also observed. Consistent with improved glycemic control demonstrated in the pivotal trial, analysis of CareLink system data from >3000 real-world patients who completed 3 months of Auto Mode-enabled MiniMed 670G system use demonstrated increased TIR and decreased time below and above TIR compared with baseline. These improved clinical outcomes were observed across a broad age range of patients with type 1 diabetes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Closed-loop system; Real-world; Time in range; Type 1 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30160523     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2018.0202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  30 in total

Review 1.  Automated Insulin Delivery in Adults.

Authors:  Charlotte K Boughton; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.741

2.  Use of Artificial Intelligence to Improve Diabetes Outcomes in Patients Using Multiple Daily Injections Therapy.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Increased proportion of time in hybrid closed-loop "Auto Mode" is associated with improved glycaemic control for adolescent and young patients with adult type 1 diabetes using the MiniMed 670G insulin pump.

Authors:  Sara H Duffus; Zain Al Ta'ani; James C Slaughter; Kevin D Niswender; Justin M Gregory
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 4.  Positioning time in range in diabetes management.

Authors:  Andrew Advani
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 10.122

5.  The Bio-inspired Artificial Pancreas for Type 1 Diabetes Control in the Home: System Architecture and Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Pau Herrero; Mohamed El-Sharkawy; John Daniels; Narvada Jugnee; Chukwuma N Uduku; Monika Reddy; Nick Oliver; Pantelis Georgiou
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-10-14

6.  MiniMed 670G hybrid closed loop artificial pancreas system for the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: overview of its safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Aria Saunders; Laurel H Messer; Gregory P Forlenza
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.166

7.  Six months of hybrid closed loop in the real-world: An evaluation of children and young adults using the 670G system.

Authors:  Cari Berget; Laurel H Messer; Tim Vigers; Brigitte I Frohnert; Laura Pyle; R Paul Wadwa; Kimberly A Driscoll; Gregory P Forlenza
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 4.866

8.  A Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Marc D Breton; Lauren G Kanapka; Roy W Beck; Laya Ekhlaspour; Gregory P Forlenza; Eda Cengiz; Melissa Schoelwer; Katrina J Ruedy; Emily Jost; Lori Carria; Emma Emory; Liana J Hsu; Mary Oliveri; Craig C Kollman; Betsy B Dokken; Stuart A Weinzimer; Mark D DeBoer; Bruce A Buckingham; Daniel Cherñavvsky; R Paul Wadwa
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Clinical Management and Pump Parameter Adjustment of the Control-IQ Closed-Loop Control System: Results from a 6-Month, Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Grenye O'Malley; Laurel H Messer; Carol J Levy; Jordan E Pinsker; Gregory P Forlenza; Elvira Isganaitis; Yogish C Kudva; Laya Ekhlaspour; Dan Raghinaru; John Lum; Sue A Brown
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 6.118

10.  One Year Clinical Experience of the First Commercial Hybrid Closed-Loop System.

Authors:  Rayhan A Lal; Marina Basina; David M Maahs; Korey Hood; Bruce Buckingham; Darrell M Wilson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.