Literature DB >> 30160024

Utility of a sensor-based technology to assist in the prevention of pressure ulcers: A clinical comparison.

Rose Raizman1, Minette MacNeil2, Laurie Rappl3.   

Abstract

Detection of subcutaneous tissue damage before it is visible can trigger early intervention and decrease hospital-acquired pressure ulcer (HAPU) rates. The objective of this two-phase study was to evaluate the clinical utility of the Sub-Epidermal Moisture (SEM) Scanner (Bruin Biometrics (BBI), LLC), a hand-held device that assesses increases in interstitial fluid or subepidermal moisture, indicating early tissue damage. Phase 1: Patients were provided standard-of-care risk assessment and interventions and were scanned with the SEM Scanner, but the resulting SEM scores were not used to determine interventions. This gave a baseline pressure ulcer incidence rate. Phase 2: This phase is the same as Phase 1 except the resulting SEM scores were used in conjunction with risk assessment scores to determine appropriate interventions and care planning. In Phase 1, 12 of the 89 subjects or 13.5% developed visible pressure ulcers-4 Stage I's, 6 Stage II's, 1 Stage III, and 1 deep tissue injury. In Phase 2, 2 of the 195 subjects or 1.0% developed visible pressure ulcers-1 Stage I and 1 Stage II. Patients in Phase 2 were more incontinent, less mobile, and had longer lengths of stay than those in Phase 1. Use of the Scanner resulted in a 93% decrease in HAPU. No deep injuries developed in Phase 2.
© 2018 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SEM scanner; patient safety; pressure ulcer; prevention; subepidermal moisture

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30160024      PMCID: PMC7949808          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  22 in total

1.  Toward real-time detection of deep tissue injury risk in wheelchair users using Hertz contact theory.

Authors:  Limor Agam; Amit Gefen
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

2.  Non-blanchable erythema as an indicator for the need for pressure ulcer prevention: a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Katrien Vanderwee; Maria Grypdonck; Tom Defloor
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.036

3.  Impedance sensing device enables early detection of pressure ulcers in vivo.

Authors:  Sarah L Swisher; Monica C Lin; Amy Liao; Elisabeth J Leeflang; Yasser Khan; Felippe J Pavinatto; Kaylee Mann; Agne Naujokas; David Young; Shuvo Roy; Michael R Harrison; Ana Claudia Arias; Vivek Subramanian; Michel M Maharbiz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Application of patient safety indicators internationally: a pilot study among seven countries.

Authors:  Saskia E Drösler; Niek S Klazinga; Patrick S Romano; Daniel J Tancredi; Maria A Gogorcena Aoiz; Moira C Hewitt; Sarah Scobie; Michael Soop; Eugene Wen; Hude Quan; William A Ghali; Soeren Mattke; Edward Kelley
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  Characteristics of recurrent pressure ulcers in veterans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Barbara M Bates-Jensen; Marylou Guihan; Susan L Garber; Amy S Chin; Stephen P Burns
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Subepidermal moisture predicts erythema and stage 1 pressure ulcers in nursing home residents: a pilot study.

Authors:  Barbara M Bates-Jensen; Heather E McCreath; Ayumi Kono; Neil Christopher R Apeles; Cathy Alessi
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 7.  Potentially modifiable risk factors among veterans with spinal cord injury hospitalized for severe pressure ulcers: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Marylou Guihan; Charles H Bombardier
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 8.  Pressure ulcer risk assessment and prevention: a systematic comparative effectiveness review.

Authors:  Roger Chou; Tracy Dana; Christina Bougatsos; Ian Blazina; Amy J Starmer; Katie Reitel; David I Buckley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Exploration of pressure ulcer and related skin problems across the spectrum of health care settings in Ontario using administrative data.

Authors:  Kevin Y Woo; Kim Sears; Joan Almost; Rosemary Wilson; Marlo Whitehead; Elizabeth G VanDenKerkhof
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.315

10.  Healthy Life-Years Lost and Excess Bed-Days Due to 6 Patient Safety Incidents: Empirical Evidence From English Hospitals.

Authors:  Katharina D Hauck; Shaolin Wang; Charles Vincent; Peter C Smith
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  2 in total

1.  Utility of a sensor-based technology to assist in the prevention of pressure ulcers: A clinical comparison.

Authors:  Rose Raizman; Minette MacNeil; Laurie Rappl
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  A blinded clinical study using a subepidermal moisture biocapacitance measurement device for early detection of pressure injuries.

Authors:  Henry Okonkwo; Ruth Bryant; Jeanette Milne; Donna Molyneaux; Julie Sanders; Glen Cunningham; Sharon Brangman; William Eardley; Garrett K Chan; Barbara Mayer; Mary Waldo; Barbara Ju
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.617

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.