Alessandro Micarelli1,2, Andrea Viziano3, Ernesto Bruno3, Elisa Micarelli4, Ivan Augimeri5, Marco Alessandrini3. 1. Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier, 1, E sud Tower, 00133, Rome, Italy. alessandromicarelli@yahoo.it. 2. ITER Center for Balance and Rehabilitation Research, Rome, Italy. alessandromicarelli@yahoo.it. 3. Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier, 1, E sud Tower, 00133, Rome, Italy. 4. Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. 5. ITER Center for Balance and Rehabilitation Research, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Considering recent advances in central cognitive- and age-related processing interfering with balance and sensory reweighting in uncompensated vestibular disorders, purpose of this study is to highlight the vestibular rehabilitation (VR) outcomes in a population of older adults and age-matched mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, both affected by unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH) and undergoing VR. METHODS: Vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), postural sway examination (respectively, performed by video head impulse test and static posturography) and dizziness-related and quality-of-life scores were collected in 12 UVH MCI individuals ≥ 55 years and 12 matched UVH older adults with age-appropriate cognitive function-cognitively evaluated by means of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-before and after a VR protocol. RESULTS: A significant post-treatment reduction in surface, length and power spectra (PS) values within low-frequency domain and an improvement in performance measures were recorded in both groups. Moreover, the VR protocol highlighted-when comparing pre-/post-treatment differences (Δ)-a significant (i) increase in Δ VOR gain; (ii) decrease in Δ surface and length and (iii) increase in Δ PS within low-frequency domain in older adults when compared to MCI patients. Positive correlations were found between MMSE and Δ Dynamic Gait Index, Δ surface and Δ PS within low-frequency domain when treating patients as 'a continuum' along the cognitive decline. CONCLUSIONS: Present pilot findings suggest that the cognitive domain insight in older adults scheduled for VR protocols may positively impact on disability consequences.
PURPOSE: Considering recent advances in central cognitive- and age-related processing interfering with balance and sensory reweighting in uncompensated vestibular disorders, purpose of this study is to highlight the vestibular rehabilitation (VR) outcomes in a population of older adults and age-matched mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, both affected by unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH) and undergoing VR. METHODS: Vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), postural sway examination (respectively, performed by video head impulse test and static posturography) and dizziness-related and quality-of-life scores were collected in 12 UVH MCI individuals ≥ 55 years and 12 matched UVH older adults with age-appropriate cognitive function-cognitively evaluated by means of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-before and after a VR protocol. RESULTS: A significant post-treatment reduction in surface, length and power spectra (PS) values within low-frequency domain and an improvement in performance measures were recorded in both groups. Moreover, the VR protocol highlighted-when comparing pre-/post-treatment differences (Δ)-a significant (i) increase in Δ VOR gain; (ii) decrease in Δ surface and length and (iii) increase in Δ PS within low-frequency domain in older adults when compared to MCI patients. Positive correlations were found between MMSE and Δ Dynamic Gait Index, Δ surface and Δ PS within low-frequency domain when treating patients as 'a continuum' along the cognitive decline. CONCLUSIONS: Present pilot findings suggest that the cognitive domain insight in older adults scheduled for VR protocols may positively impact on disability consequences.
Authors: Carol Li; Andrew J Layman; Robert Geary; Eric Anson; John P Carey; Luigi Ferrucci; Yuri Agrawal Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Mirke S Hondebrink; Agali Mert; Roos van der Lint; J Alexander de Ru; Peter van der Wurff Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 1.817