Literature DB >> 23816962

Comparison of PAM50 risk of recurrence score with oncotype DX and IHC4 for predicting risk of distant recurrence after endocrine therapy.

Mitch Dowsett1, Ivana Sestak, Elena Lopez-Knowles, Kalvinder Sidhu, Anita K Dunbier, J Wayne Cowens, Sean Ferree, James Storhoff, Carl Schaper, Jack Cuzick.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Risk of distant recurrence (DR) among women with estrogen receptor (ER) -positive early breast cancer is the major determinant of recommendations for or against chemotherapy. It is frequently estimated using the Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS). The PAM50 risk of recurrence (ROR) score provides an alternative approach, which also identifies intrinsic subtypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: mRNA from 1,017 patients with ER-positive primary breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen in the ATAC trial was assessed for ROR using the NanoString nCounter. Likelihood ratio (LR) tests and concordance indices (c indices) were used to assess the prognostic information provided beyond that of a clinical treatment score (CTS) by RS, ROR, or IHC4, an index of DR risk derived from immunohistochemical assessment of ER, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki67.
RESULTS: ROR added significant prognostic information beyond CTS in all patients (Δ LR-χ(2) = 33.9; P < .001) and in all four subgroups: node negative, node positive, HER2 negative, and HER2 negative/node negative; more information was added by ROR than by RS. C indices in the HER2-negative/node-negative subgroup were 0.73, 0.76, and 0.78 for CTS, CTS plus RS, and CTS plus ROR, respectively. More patients were scored as high risk and fewer as intermediate risk by ROR than by RS. Relatively similar prognostic information was added by ROR and IHC4 in all patients but more by ROR in the HER2-negative/node-negative group.
CONCLUSION: ROR provides more prognostic information in endocrine-treated patients with ER-positive, node-negative disease than RS, with better differentiation of intermediate- and higher-risk groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23816962     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.1558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  200 in total

Review 1.  [Molecular pathology for breast cancer: Importance of the gene expression profile].

Authors:  C Denkert; B M Pfitzner; B I Heppner; M Dietel
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Clinical utility of multigene profiling assays in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  M C Chang; L H Souter; S Kamel-Reid; M Rutherford; P Bedard; M Trudeau; J Hart; A Eisen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Defining breast cancer intrinsic subtypes by quantitative receptor expression.

Authors:  Maggie C U Cheang; Miguel Martin; Torsten O Nielsen; Aleix Prat; David Voduc; Alvaro Rodriguez-Lescure; Amparo Ruiz; Stephen Chia; Lois Shepherd; Manuel Ruiz-Borrego; Lourdes Calvo; Emilio Alba; Eva Carrasco; Rosalia Caballero; Dongsheng Tu; Kathleen I Pritchard; Mark N Levine; Vivien H Bramwell; Joel Parker; Philip S Bernard; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou; Angelo Di Leo; Lisa A Carey
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-04-23

4.  Tailoring therapies--improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015.

Authors:  A S Coates; E P Winer; A Goldhirsch; R D Gelber; M Gnant; M Piccart-Gebhart; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Linking estrogen-induced apoptosis with decreases in mortality following long-term adjuvant tamoxifen therapy.

Authors:  V Craig Jordan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Multigene Assays for Classification, Prognosis, and Prediction in Breast Cancer: a Critical Review on the Background and Clinical Utility.

Authors:  P Sinn; S Aulmann; R Wirtz; S Schott; F Marmé; Z Varga; A Lebeau; H Kreipe; A Schneeweiss
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 7.  Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Maryann Kwa; Andreas Makris; Francisco J Esteva
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Emerging gene-based prognostic tools in early breast cancer: First steps to personalised medicine.

Authors:  Umar Wazir; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

Review 9.  Genomic profiling in luminal breast cancer.

Authors:  Oleg Gluz; Daniel Hofmann; Rachel Würstlein; Cornelia Liedtke; Ulrike Nitz; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Intrinsic subtypes and genomic signatures of primary breast cancer and prognosis after systemic relapse.

Authors:  Claudette Falato; Nicholas P Tobin; Julie Lorent; Linda S Lindström; Jonas Bergh; Theodoros Foukakis
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 6.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.