Literature DB >> 3015781

The role of complement in monoclonal antibody-mediated protection against virulent Semliki Forest virus.

W A Boere, B J Benaissa-Trouw, T Harmsen, T Erich, C A Kraaijeveld, H Snippe.   

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (MAs), specific for either the E1 or E2 glycoproteins of Semliki Forest virus (SFV), and belonging to various immunoglobulin subclasses (IgM, IgG2a, IgG2b and IgG3), effected lysis of SFV-infected L cells in co-operation with guinea-pig complement. In this antibody-dependent complement-mediated cytolysis (ADCMC) test, IgG1 MAs were not effective although these antibodies recognize the viral antigens on the surface of SFV-infected L cells. The latter was shown with horseradish peroxidase (HRPO)-labelled MAs in a direct enzyme immunoassay. The binding reactivities of HRPO-labelled MAs to infected L cells at selected time-intervals after infection correlated well with the amount of cytolysis in a parallel ADCMC test. Cytolysis was dependent on the duration of incubation with antibodies: more cytolysis was measured after a 4-hr incubation period with MA, starting at 4 hr after infection, compared to a 1-hr incubation period starting after 7 hr of infection. However, in the latter case (1-hr period) the amount of cytolysis measured correlated better to neutralization and/or protection by MAs than after the extended period (4 hr) of incubation. Complement (C3) depletion by cobra venom factor treatment led to a higher mortality and viraemia of mice prophylactically injected with critically protective doses of either the neutralizing MA UM 8.4 (IgM) or the non-neutralizing MA UM 4.2 (IgG2a). The results suggest a co-operative role of MA with complement in mediating protection against SFV. Passive immunization by administration of low amounts (0.1 micrograms/mouse) of neutralizing MA UM 5.1 resulted in protection of normal mice against a lethal infection with SFV. Mice immunosuppressed by cyclophosphamide were not protected by these doses. If the doses were increased however, these mice were protected both prophylactically and therapeutically. These results indicate that, using critical doses of MAs, an intact immune system ensures survival in normal mice after infection with virulent SFV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3015781      PMCID: PMC1453121     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunology        ISSN: 0019-2805            Impact factor:   7.397


  28 in total

1.  Microassay for colorimetric estimation of complement activity in guinea pig, human and mouse serum.

Authors:  J P Klerx; C J Beukelman; H Van Dijk; J M Willers
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1983-10-14       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 2.  Mechanisms of neutralization of animal viruses.

Authors:  N J Dimmock
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.891

3.  Detection of Semliki Forest virus in cell culture by use of an enzyme immunoassay with peroxidase-labeled monoclonal antibodies specific for glycoproteins E1 and E2.

Authors:  F H van Tiel; W A Boere; J Vinjé; T Harmsen; B J Benaissa-Trouw; C A Kraaijeveld; H Snippe
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Protection from respiratory syncytial virus infection in cotton rats by passive transfer of monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  E E Walsh; J J Schlesinger; M W Brandriss
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Correlation between segmental flexibility and effector function of antibodies.

Authors:  V T Oi; T M Vuong; R Hardy; J Reidler; J Dangle; L A Herzenberg; L Stryer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Jan 12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Protection against lethal viral infection by neutralizing and nonneutralizing monoclonal antibodies: distinct mechanisms of action in vivo.

Authors:  L Lefrancois
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Neutralizing and non-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to the E2 glycoprotein of Semliki Forest virus can protect mice from lethal encephalitis.

Authors:  W A Boere; B J Benaissa-Trouw; M Harmsen; C A Kraaijeveld; H Snippe
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.891

8.  Elucidation of the topography and determination of the protective epitopes on the E glycoprotein of Saint Louis encephalitis virus by passive transfer with monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  J H Mathews; J T Roehrig
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  The pathogenicity of the M9 mutant of Semliki Forest virus in immune-compromised mice.

Authors:  M C Gates; B J Sheahan; G J Atkins
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.891

10.  Identification of distinct antigenic determinants on Semliki Forest virus by using monoclonal antibodies with different antiviral activities.

Authors:  W A Boere; T Harmsen; J Vinjé; B J Benaissa-Trouw; C A Kraaijeveld; H Snippe
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.103

View more
  11 in total

1.  Complement component 3 interactions with coxsackievirus B3 capsid proteins: innate immunity and the rapid formation of splenic antiviral germinal centers.

Authors:  D R Anderson; C M Carthy; J E Wilson; D Yang; D V Devine; B M McManus
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Discrimination of the determinant specificity of two competitive Semliki Forest virus neutralizing monoclonal antibodies by anti-idiotypic antibodies.

Authors:  T A Oosterlaken; C A Kraaijeveld; A Snijders; M Harmsen; B J Benaissa-Trouw; H Snippe
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.574

3.  Semliki Forest virus E2 envelope epitopes induce a nonneutralizing humoral response which protects mice against lethal challenge.

Authors:  H Grosfeld; B Velan; M Leitner; S Cohen; S Lustig; B E Lachmi; A Shafferman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  The complementary roles of cellular and humoral immunity in resistance to re-infection with LCM virus.

Authors:  A R Thomsen; O Marker
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 5.  The alphaviruses: gene expression, replication, and evolution.

Authors:  J H Strauss; E G Strauss
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-09

Review 6.  Herpes simplex virus as a tool to define the role of complement in the immune response to peripheral infection.

Authors:  Mark A Brockman; David M Knipe
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Utilization of complement-dependent cytotoxicity to measure low levels of antibodies: application to nonstructural protein 1 in a model of Japanese encephalitis virus.

Authors:  Eiji Konishi; Yoko Kitai; Takashi Kondo
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-11-21

8.  Functions of Antibodies.

Authors:  Donald N Forthal
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2014-08-15

9.  Divergent envelope E2 alphavirus sequences spanning amino acids 297 to 352 induce in mice virus-specific protective immunity and antibodies with complement-mediated cytolytic activity.

Authors:  H Grosfeld; S Lustig; Y Gozes; B Velan; S Cohen; M Leitner; B Lachmi; D Katz; U Olshevski; A Shafferman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Passively transferred monoclonal antibody to the M2 protein inhibits influenza A virus replication in mice.

Authors:  J J Treanor; E L Tierney; S L Zebedee; R A Lamb; B R Murphy
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.