| Literature DB >> 30157266 |
Thomas Stiermaier1,2, Torben Lange3,4, Amedeo Chiribiri5, Christian Möller1,2, Tobias Graf1,2, Uwe Raaz3,4, Adriana Villa5, Johannes T Kowallick4,6, Joachim Lotz4,6, Gerd Hasenfuß3,4, Holger Thiele7, Andreas Schuster3,4,8, Ingo Eitel1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A substantial number of patients with Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) exhibit right ventricular (RV) dysfunction which has been associated with adverse outcome. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and prognostic value of RV myocardial strain in TTS using cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking (CMR-FT).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30157266 PMCID: PMC6114723 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202146
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Analysis of right ventricular longitudinal strain.
CMR-FT of long-axis 4-chamber views to quantify longitudinal RV strain in a TTS patient with and without RV involvement. RV = right ventricular.
Main patient characteristics.
| Variable | All patients | RV strain > -17.24% | RV strain ≤ -17.24% | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 71 (61, 77) | 72 (63, 79) | 70 (61, 77) | 0.17 |
| Female sex | 112 (83.6) | 49 (89.1) | 63 (79.7) | 0.15 |
| Current smoking | 21 (15.7) | 10 (18.2) | 11 (13.9) | 0.55 |
| Hypertension | 104 (77.6) | 44 (80.0) | 60 (75.9) | 0.77 |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 32 (23.9) | 14 (25.5) | 18 (22.8) | 0.78 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 30 (23.4) | 13 (23.6) | 17 (21.5) | 0.83 |
| Killip-class 3/4 on admission | 7 (5.2) | 4 (7.3) | 3 (3.8) | 0.37 |
| Cardiogenic shock | 5 (3.7) | 3 (5.5) | 2 (2.5) | 0.38 |
| Days of hospitalization | 4 (3, 6) | 5 (3, 7) | 4 (3, 6) | 0.77 |
| 86 (64.2) | 43 (78.2) | 43 (54.4) | ||
| Emotional | 37 (27.6) | 15 (27.3) | 22 (27.8) | 0.94 |
| Physical | 49 (36.6) | 28 (50.9) | 21 (26.6) | |
| Apical | 93 (69.4) | 93 (69.4) | 51 (64.6) | 0.15 |
| Midventricular | 39 (29.1) | 12 (21.8) | 27 (34.2) | 0.12 |
| Basal | 2 (1.5) | 1 (1.8) | 1 (1.3) | 0.80 |
| Initial LV-EF (%) | 46.1 ± 8.7 | 44.1 ± 8.4 | 47.7 ± 8.7 | |
| Follow-up LV-EF (%) | 60.4 ± 7.1 | 60.2 ± 7.4 | 60.5 ± 7.0 | 0.79 |
Data are presented as n (%), median (IQR), or mean ± standard deviation. P-values were calculated for the comparison between patients with a global RV strain > -17.24% versus ≤ -17.24%. Numbers in bold type indicate a significant difference. EF = ejection fraction; LV = left ventricular; RV = right ventricular.
Right ventricular myocardial strain in Takotsubo syndrome.
| Total cohort | Left ventricular ballooning pattern | p | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apical | Midventricular | Basal | |||
| Peak strain (%) | -19 (-13, -25) | -18 (-12, -25) | -21 (-16, -25) | -18 (-13, -23) | 0.44 |
| TTP strain (ms) | 368 (331, 408) | 318 (268, 385) | 313 (264, 359) | 456 (410, 502) | |
| Peak strain (%) | -16 (-9, -24) | -16 (-10, -24) | -16 (-9, -26) | -7 (-13, -1) | 0.33 |
| TTP strain (ms) | 365 (288, 459) | 364 (277, 463) | 382 (288, 459) | 445 (312, 579) | 0.80 |
| Peak strain (%) | -24 (-15, -34) | -23 (-13, -35) | -25 (-19, -32) | -26 (-16, -35) | 0.50 |
| TTP strain (ms) | 329 (280, 425) | 326 (272, 435) | 335 (288, 413) | 391 (313, 469) | 0.75 |
| Peak strain (%) | -11 (-6, -18) | -11 (-6, -20) | -12 (-7, -17) | -24 (-14, -35) | 0.42 |
| TTP strain (ms) | 386 (278, 495) | 377 (264, 488) | 398 (296, 513) | 515 (494, 536) | 0.25 |
| Peak strain (%) | -17 (-10, -26) | -17 (-10, -26) | -20 (-10, -26) | -19 (-32, -6) | 0.85 |
| TTP strain (ms) | 383 (297, 465) | 398 (288, 478) | 358 (299, 445) | 506 (301, 712) | 0.55 |
| Peak strain (%) | -26 (-13, -35) | -22 (-11, -35) | -28 (-21, 35) | -50 (-45, -55) | |
| TTP strain (ms) | 313 (253, 385) | 318 (251, 404) | 308 (254, 372) | 245 (189, 301) | 0.48 |
| Peak strain (%) | -23 (-15, -33) | -24 (-16, -34) | -20 (-14, -28) | -18 (-1, -35) | 0.58 |
| TTP strain (ms) | 332 (268, 423) | 330 (263, 395) | 348 (286, 466) | 637 (313, 961) | 0.26 |
Data are presented as median (IQR). P-values were calculated for the comparison between different ballooning patterns. Numbers in bold type indicate a significant difference. TTP = time-to-peak
Fig 2Global right ventricular strain plotted against left ventricular ejection fraction.
Global RV strain correlated significantly with LV ejection fraction determined in CMR imaging. LV = left ventricular; RV = right ventricular.
Fig 3Recovery of global right ventricular strain in Takotsubo syndrome.
Box (25th percentile, median, 75th percentile) and whisker (10th and 90th percentile) plots illustrating recovery of global RV strain during follow-up. RV = right ventricular.
Fig 4Global right ventricular strain in patients with and without right ventricular involvement according to visual assessment.
Box (25th percentile, median, 75th percentile) and whisker (10th and 90th percentile) plots in TTS patients with and without RV ballooning according to sole visual assessment. RV = right ventricular.
Fig 5Kaplan-Meier analysis for long-term mortality according to global right ventricular strain.
Patients were stratified according to global RV strain (optimal cutoff determined by the Youden index). TTS patients with a strain value > -17.24% demonstrated a significantly higher mortality compared to patients with a strain of ≤ -17.24%.