Literature DB >> 30156038

Genome Editing with CRISPR-Cas9 in Lactobacillus plantarum Revealed That Editing Outcomes Can Vary Across Strains and Between Methods.

Ryan T Leenay1, Justin M Vento1, Malay Shah1, Maria Elena Martino2, François Leulier2, Chase L Beisel1,3,4.   

Abstract

Lactic-acid bacteria such as Lactobacillus plantarum are commonly used for fermenting foods and as probiotics, where increasingly sophisticated genome-editing tools are employed to elucidate and enhance these microbes' beneficial properties. The most advanced tools to date utilize an oligonucleotide or double-stranded DNA donor for recombineering and Cas9 for targeted DNA cleavage. As the associated methods are often developed in isolation for one strain, it remains unclear how different Cas9-based editing methods compare across strains. Here, this work directly compares two methods in different strains of L. plantarum: one utilizing a plasmid-encoded recombineering template and another utilizing an oligonucleotide donor and an inducible DNA recombinase. This comparison reveals one instance in which only the recombineering-template method generates desired edits and another instance in which only the oligo method generates desired edits. It is further found that both methods exhibit highly variable success editing the same site across multiple L. plantarum strains. Finally, failure modes are identified for the recombineering-template method, including a consistent genomic deletion and reversion of a point mutation in the recombineering template. This study therefore highlights surprising differences for Cas9-mediated genome editing between methods and related strains, arguing for the need for multiple, distinct methods when performing CRISPR-based editing in bacteria.
© 2018 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genome editing; lactobacilli; recombineering; shuttle plasmids

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30156038     DOI: 10.1002/biot.201700583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol J        ISSN: 1860-6768            Impact factor:   4.677


  14 in total

1.  CRISPR/Cas9-Assisted Seamless Genome Editing in Lactobacillus plantarum and Its Application in N-Acetylglucosamine Production.

Authors:  Ding Zhou; Zhennan Jiang; Qingxiao Pang; Yuan Zhu; Qian Wang; Qingsheng Qi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Genome editing using the endogenous type I CRISPR-Cas system in Lactobacillus crispatus.

Authors:  Claudio Hidalgo-Cantabrana; Yong Jun Goh; Meichen Pan; Rosemary Sanozky-Dawes; Rodolphe Barrangou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Barriers to genome editing with CRISPR in bacteria.

Authors:  Justin M Vento; Nathan Crook; Chase L Beisel
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 4.  Recent progress on n-butanol production by lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  Qi Li; Jieze Zhang; Junjie Yang; Yu Jiang; Sheng Yang
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  CRISPR Interference for Rapid Knockdown of Essential Cell Cycle Genes in Lactobacillus plantarum.

Authors:  Ine Storaker Myrbråten; Kamilla Wiull; Zhian Salehian; Leiv Sigve Håvarstein; Daniel Straume; Geir Mathiesen; Morten Kjos
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.389

Review 6.  Genome editing of lactic acid bacteria: opportunities for food, feed, pharma and biotech.

Authors:  Rosa A Börner; Vijayalakshmi Kandasamy; Amalie M Axelsen; Alex T Nielsen; Elleke F Bosma
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Competitive Exclusion Is a Major Bioprotective Mechanism of Lactobacilli against Fungal Spoilage in Fermented Milk Products.

Authors:  Solvej Siedler; Martin Holm Rau; Susanne Bidstrup; Justin M Vento; Stina Dissing Aunsbjerg; Elleke F Bosma; Laura M McNair; Chase L Beisel; Ana Rute Neves
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Spacer prioritization in CRISPR-Cas9 immunity is enabled by the leader RNA.

Authors:  Sahil Sharma; Sarah L Svensson; Anuja Kibe; Zasha Weinberg; Chunyu Liao; Omer S Alkhnbashi; Thorsten Bischler; Rolf Backofen; Neva Caliskan; Cynthia M Sharma; Chase L Beisel
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 30.964

Review 9.  Genome Editing in Bacteria: CRISPR-Cas and Beyond.

Authors:  Ruben D Arroyo-Olarte; Ricardo Bravo Rodríguez; Edgar Morales-Ríos
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 10.  Genetic tools for the development of recombinant lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  Jiapeng Wu; Yongping Xin; Jian Kong; Tingting Guo
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 5.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.