João Cavaleiro Rufo1,2,3, Inês Paciência1,2,3, Francisca Castro Mendes1, Mariana Farraia1, Ana Rodolfo1,4, Diana Silva1,4, Eduardo de Oliveira Fernandes3, Luís Delgado1,4, André Moreira1,2,4. 1. Imunologia Básica e Clínica, Departamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal. 2. EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal. 3. Grupo de Energia e Ambiente Construído, Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Industrial, Porto, Portugal. 4. Departamento de Imunoalergologia, Centro Hospitalar S. João EPE, Porto, Portugal.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and phenotyping of paediatric asthma are particularly complex due to the lack of currently available sensitive diagnostic tools. This often results in uncertainties associated with inhaled steroid therapy prescription. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether volatile organic compounds measured in exhaled breath condensate can be used as biomarkers for asthma diagnosis in the paediatric population. METHODS: A total of 64 participants, aged 6-18 years, were recruited on a random basis during visits to an outpatient allergy clinic and to a juvenile football team training session. Lung function, airway reversibility and skin prick tests were performed. Exhaled breath condensate samples were collected, and breathprints were assessed using an electronic nose. Information on medical diagnosis of asthma, rhinitis and atopic dermatitis was retrieved for each participant. A hierarchical cluster model based on the volatilome profiles was then created. RESULTS: A two-cluster exhaled volatile organic compound-based hierarchical model was able to significantly discriminate individuals with asthma from those without the disease (AUC = 0.81 [0.69-0.93], P < 0.001). Individuals who had persistent asthma and were prescribed corticosteroid therapy by the physician were also significantly distinguished in the model (AUC = 0.81 [0.70-0.92], P < 0.001). Despite being less specific, the method showed higher overall accuracy, sensitivity and AUC values when compared to spirometry with bronchodilation. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the exhaled breath condensate volatilome allowed the distinction of paediatric individuals with a medical diagnosis of asthma, identifying those in need of corticosteroid therapy.
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and phenotyping of paediatric asthma are particularly complex due to the lack of currently available sensitive diagnostic tools. This often results in uncertainties associated with inhaled steroid therapy prescription. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether volatile organic compounds measured in exhaled breath condensate can be used as biomarkers for asthma diagnosis in the paediatric population. METHODS: A total of 64 participants, aged 6-18 years, were recruited on a random basis during visits to an outpatientallergy clinic and to a juvenile football team training session. Lung function, airway reversibility and skin prick tests were performed. Exhaled breath condensate samples were collected, and breathprints were assessed using an electronic nose. Information on medical diagnosis of asthma, rhinitis and atopic dermatitis was retrieved for each participant. A hierarchical cluster model based on the volatilome profiles was then created. RESULTS: A two-cluster exhaled volatile organic compound-based hierarchical model was able to significantly discriminate individuals with asthma from those without the disease (AUC = 0.81 [0.69-0.93], P < 0.001). Individuals who had persistent asthma and were prescribed corticosteroid therapy by the physician were also significantly distinguished in the model (AUC = 0.81 [0.70-0.92], P < 0.001). Despite being less specific, the method showed higher overall accuracy, sensitivity and AUC values when compared to spirometry with bronchodilation. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the exhaled breath condensate volatilome allowed the distinction of paediatric individuals with a medical diagnosis of asthma, identifying those in need of corticosteroid therapy.
Authors: Zehra Nur Töreyin; Manosij Ghosh; Özlem Göksel; Tuncay Göksel; Lode Godderis Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: I G van der Sar; N Wijbenga; M E Hellemons; C C Moor; G Nakshbandi; J G J V Aerts; O C Manintveld; M S Wijsenbeek Journal: Respir Res Date: 2021-09-17
Authors: Michiel A G E Bannier; Sophie Kienhorst; Quirijn Jöbsis; Kim D G van de Kant; Frederik-Jan van Schooten; Agnieszka Smolinska; Edward Dompeling Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Rosa A Sola Martínez; José M Pastor Hernández; Óscar Yanes Torrado; Manuel Cánovas Díaz; Teresa de Diego Puente; María Vinaixa Crevillent Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2020-09-12 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Tesfaye B Mersha; Yashira Afanador; Elisabet Johansson; Steven P Proper; Jonathan A Bernstein; Marc E Rothenberg; Gurjit K Khurana Hershey Journal: Clin Rev Allergy Immunol Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 8.667
Authors: Ekaterina Krauss; Jana Haberer; Olga Maurer; Guillermo Barreto; Fotios Drakopanagiotakis; Maria Degen; Werner Seeger; Andreas Guenther Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 4.241