Kelly A Romano1,2, Martin A Swanbrow Becker3, Christina D Colgary3, Amy Magnuson4. 1. Department of Educational Psychology and Learning Systems, Florida State University, 1114 West Call Street, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA. kroma001@odu.edu. 2. The Virginia Consortium Program in Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, 250 Mills Godwin Building, Norfolk, VA, 23529, USA. kroma001@odu.edu. 3. Department of Educational Psychology and Learning Systems, Florida State University, 1114 West Call Street, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA. 4. University Health Services, Florida State University, 960 Learning Way, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The current study evaluated the comparative implications of self-weighing and calorie counting versus intuitive eating (IE) on the eating disorder (ED) severity of college students. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, college students in the US [N = 902; 68% female; mean body mass index (BMI) = 24.3] completed the web-based Healthy Bodies Study in 2015. RESULTS: A hierarchical multiple regression analysis revealed that elevated BMI, more frequent self-weighing and calorie counting, and lower IE scores predicted increased ED severity. The results of Kruskal-Wallis H tests indicated that participants with elevated weight statuses engaged in self-weighing and calorie counting more frequently, and possessed lower IE scores, than their lower weight counterparts. CONCLUSION: Engaging in self-weighing and calorie counting was adversely associated with ED severity among the present sample of college students. Cultivating IE within health promotion efforts may, instead, lead to favorable eating-related outcomes that may translate to the holistic health of this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V cross-sectional descriptive study.
OBJECTIVE: The current study evaluated the comparative implications of self-weighing and calorie counting versus intuitive eating (IE) on the eating disorder (ED) severity of college students. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, college students in the US [N = 902; 68% female; mean body mass index (BMI) = 24.3] completed the web-based Healthy Bodies Study in 2015. RESULTS: A hierarchical multiple regression analysis revealed that elevated BMI, more frequent self-weighing and calorie counting, and lower IE scores predicted increased ED severity. The results of Kruskal-Wallis H tests indicated that participants with elevated weight statuses engaged in self-weighing and calorie counting more frequently, and possessed lower IE scores, than their lower weight counterparts. CONCLUSION: Engaging in self-weighing and calorie counting was adversely associated with ED severity among the present sample of college students. Cultivating IE within health promotion efforts may, instead, lead to favorable eating-related outcomes that may translate to the holistic health of this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V cross-sectional descriptive study.
Entities:
Keywords:
Eating disorders; Intuitive eating; Obesity; Self-monitoring; Young adult
Authors: Michael D Jensen; Donna H Ryan; Caroline M Apovian; Jamy D Ard; Anthony G Comuzzie; Karen A Donato; Frank B Hu; Van S Hubbard; John M Jakicic; Robert F Kushner; Catherine M Loria; Barbara E Millen; Cathy A Nonas; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; June Stevens; Victor J Stevens; Thomas A Wadden; Bruce M Wolfe; Susan Z Yanovski; Harmon S Jordan; Karima A Kendall; Linda J Lux; Roycelynn Mentor-Marcel; Laura C Morgan; Michael G Trisolini; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jennifer A Linde; Robert W Jeffery; Emily A Finch; Gregory E Simon; Evette J Ludman; Belinda H Operskalski; Laura Ichikawa; Paul Rohde Journal: Prev Med Date: 2007-03-31 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Jessica Gokee LaRose; Joseph L Fava; Elizabeth A Steeves; Jacki Hecht; Rena R Wing; Hollie A Raynor Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2013-11-18 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Sydney Hoel; Amanda Victory; Tijana Sagorac Gruichich; Zachary N Stowe; Melvin G McInnis; Amy Cochran; Emily B K Thomas Journal: Front Digit Health Date: 2022-05-12
Authors: Samantha L Hahn; Vivienne M Hazzard; Katie A Loth; Nicole Larson; Laura Klein; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer Journal: Prev Med Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Samantha L Hahn; Niko Kaciroti; Daniel Eisenberg; Heidi M Weeks; Katherine W Bauer; Kendrin R Sonneville Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 5.234
Authors: Amanda Raffoul; Brooke Gibbons; Karla Boluk; Elena Neiterman; David Hammond; Sharon I Kirkpatrick Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Samantha L Hahn; Katherine W Bauer; Niko Kaciroti; Daniel Eisenberg; Sarah K Lipson; Kendrin R Sonneville Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 4.861