Samantha L Hahn1, Niko Kaciroti2, Daniel Eisenberg3, Heidi M Weeks4, Katherine W Bauer4, Kendrin R Sonneville4. 1. (1)Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis and Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences at the University of Minnesota Medical School. Minneapolis. At the time of the study, she was a doctoral candidate, Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor. Electronic address: hahn0203@umn.edu. 2. (3)Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor. 3. (4)Department of Health Policy and Management, University of California Los Angeles School of Public Health, Los Angeles. 4. (5)Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Strong positive relationships between dietary self-monitoring and eating disorder risk are seen in population-based, observational studies. However, current evidence cannot establish causality. Furthermore, little is known about other mental and behavioral health consequences of dietary self-monitoring among college women, a population vulnerable to eating disorders. OBJECTIVE: To determine if introducing dietary self-monitoring via a popular smartphone app to undergraduate women impacts eating disorder risk, other aspects of mental health, or health behaviors including dietary intake and physical activity. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS/ SETTING: Undergraduate women who had not engaged in dietary self-monitoring in the past year and who were at low-risk for an eating disorder participated between May and October 2019 (n = 200). INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to engage in dietary self-monitoring via MyFitnessPal for approximately 1 month or to receive no intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-report data on eating disorder risk, other mental health outcomes, and health behaviors were collected at baseline and post-intervention. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Linear and logistic regressions were utilized to test hypotheses. RESULTS: Adherence to the intervention was high, with participants recording their dietary intake via MyFitnessPal on average 89.1% of days between baseline and post-intervention. Assignment to the intervention was not associated with changes in eating disorder risk, anxiety, depressive symptoms, body satisfaction, quality of life, nutritional intake, physical activity, screen time, or other forms of weight-related self-monitoring (all P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Among dietary self-monitoring naive undergraduate women with low-risk of an eating disorder, dietary self-monitoring via MyFitnessPal for 1 month did not increase eating disorder risk, impact other aspects of mental health, or alter health behaviors including dietary intake. The null results in our study may be due to the selection of a low-risk sample; future research should explore whether there are populations for whom dietary self-monitoring is contraindicated.
BACKGROUND: Strong positive relationships between dietary self-monitoring and eating disorder risk are seen in population-based, observational studies. However, current evidence cannot establish causality. Furthermore, little is known about other mental and behavioral health consequences of dietary self-monitoring among college women, a population vulnerable to eating disorders. OBJECTIVE: To determine if introducing dietary self-monitoring via a popular smartphone app to undergraduate women impacts eating disorder risk, other aspects of mental health, or health behaviors including dietary intake and physical activity. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS/ SETTING: Undergraduate women who had not engaged in dietary self-monitoring in the past year and who were at low-risk for an eating disorder participated between May and October 2019 (n = 200). INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to engage in dietary self-monitoring via MyFitnessPal for approximately 1 month or to receive no intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-report data on eating disorder risk, other mental health outcomes, and health behaviors were collected at baseline and post-intervention. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Linear and logistic regressions were utilized to test hypotheses. RESULTS: Adherence to the intervention was high, with participants recording their dietary intake via MyFitnessPal on average 89.1% of days between baseline and post-intervention. Assignment to the intervention was not associated with changes in eating disorder risk, anxiety, depressive symptoms, body satisfaction, quality of life, nutritional intake, physical activity, screen time, or other forms of weight-related self-monitoring (all P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Among dietary self-monitoring naive undergraduate women with low-risk of an eating disorder, dietary self-monitoring via MyFitnessPal for 1 month did not increase eating disorder risk, impact other aspects of mental health, or alter health behaviors including dietary intake. The null results in our study may be due to the selection of a low-risk sample; future research should explore whether there are populations for whom dietary self-monitoring is contraindicated.
Authors: Michael D Jensen; Donna H Ryan; Caroline M Apovian; Jamy D Ard; Anthony G Comuzzie; Karen A Donato; Frank B Hu; Van S Hubbard; John M Jakicic; Robert F Kushner; Catherine M Loria; Barbara E Millen; Cathy A Nonas; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; June Stevens; Victor J Stevens; Thomas A Wadden; Bruce M Wolfe; Susan Z Yanovski; Harmon S Jordan; Karima A Kendall; Linda J Lux; Roycelynn Mentor-Marcel; Laura C Morgan; Michael G Trisolini; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Virginia Quick; Katie Loth; Richard MacLehose; Jennifer A Linde; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Hiba Jebeile; Megan L Gow; Louise A Baur; Sarah P Garnett; Susan J Paxton; Natalie B Lister Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2019-05-26 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Nicole Gideon; Nick Hawkes; Jonathan Mond; Rob Saunders; Kate Tchanturia; Lucy Serpell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Elizabeth Victoria Eikey; Madhu C Reddy; Kayla M Booth; Lynette Kvasny; Johnna L Blair; Victor Li; Erika S Poole Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 4.773