Literature DB >> 30155789

MRI-based prediction of conversion from clinically isolated syndrome to clinically definite multiple sclerosis using SVM and lesion geometry.

Kerstin Bendfeldt1, Bernd Taschler2,3, Laura Gaetano4,5, Philip Madoerin4, Pascal Kuster4, Nicole Mueller-Lenke4, Michael Amann4,5, Hugo Vrenken6, Viktor Wottschel6, Frederik Barkhof6,7, Stefan Borgwardt4,8,9, Stefan Klöppel10, Eva-Maria Wicklein11, Ludwig Kappos5, Gilles Edan12, Mark S Freedman13, Xavier Montalbán14, Hans-Peter Hartung15, Christoph Pohl11,16, Rupert Sandbrink11,15, Till Sprenger4,5, Ernst-Wilhelm Radue4, Jens Wuerfel4,16, Thomas E Nichols3.   

Abstract

Neuroanatomical pattern classification using support vector machines (SVMs) has shown promising results in classifying Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients based on individual structural magnetic resonance images (MRI). To determine whether pattern classification using SVMs facilitates predicting conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS) from clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). We used baseline MRI data from 364 patients with CIS, randomised to interferon beta-1b or placebo. Non-linear SVMs and 10-fold cross-validation were applied to predict converters/non-converters (175/189) at two years follow-up based on clinical and demographic data, lesion-specific quantitative geometric features and grey-matter-to-whole-brain volume ratios. We applied linear SVM analysis and leave-one-out cross-validation to subgroups of converters (n = 25) and non-converters (n = 44) based on cortical grey matter segmentations. Highest prediction accuracies of 70.4% (p = 8e-5) were reached with a combination of lesion-specific geometric (image-based) and demographic/clinical features. Cortical grey matter was informative for the placebo group (acc.: 64.6%, p = 0.002) but not for the interferon group. Classification based on demographic/clinical covariates only resulted in an accuracy of 56% (p = 0.05). Overall, lesion geometry was more informative in the interferon group, EDSS and sex were more important for the placebo cohort. Alongside standard demographic and clinical measures, both lesion geometry and grey matter based information can aid prediction of conversion to CDMS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Clinically isolated syndrome; Lesion geometry; MRI; Multiple sclerosis; Support vector machine

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30155789      PMCID: PMC6733701          DOI: 10.1007/s11682-018-9942-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav        ISSN: 1931-7557            Impact factor:   3.978


  52 in total

1.  On the analysis of spatial binary images.

Authors:  C Lang; J Ohser; R Hilfer
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.758

2.  Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bates; Stephen M Wilson; Ayse Pinar Saygin; Frederic Dick; Martin I Sereno; Robert T Knight; Nina F Dronkers
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Euler-Poincaré characteristics of classes of disordered media.

Authors:  C H Arns; M A Knackstedt; W V Pinczewski; K R Mecke
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2001-02-27

4.  Isolated demyelinating syndromes: comparison of CSF oligoclonal bands and different MR imaging criteria to predict conversion to CDMS.

Authors:  M Tintoré; A Rovira; L Brieva; E Grivé; R Jardí; C Borrás; X Montalban
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  Has your patient's multiple sclerosis lesion burden or brain atrophy actually changed?

Authors:  Xingchang Wei; Charles R G Guttmann; Simon K Warfield; Michael Eliasziw; J Ross Mitchell
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  Three-dimensional analysis of the geometry of individual multiple sclerosis lesions: detection of shape changes over time using spherical harmonics.

Authors:  Daniel Goldberg-Zimring; Anat Achiron; Charles R G Guttmann; Haim Azhari
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Frontal parenchymal atrophy measures in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Laura Locatelli; Robert Zivadinov; Attilio Grop; Marino Zorzon
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  A longitudinal study of abnormalities on MRI and disability from multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Peter A Brex; Olga Ciccarelli; Jonathon I O'Riordan; Michael Sailer; Alan J Thompson; David H Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Early development of multiple sclerosis is associated with progressive grey matter atrophy in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes.

Authors:  Catherine M Dalton; Declan T Chard; Gerard R Davies; Katherine A Miszkiel; Dan R Altmann; Kryshani Fernando; Gordon T Plant; Alan J Thompson; David H Miller
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W I McDonald; A Compston; G Edan; D Goodkin; H P Hartung; F D Lublin; H F McFarland; D W Paty; C H Polman; S C Reingold; M Sandberg-Wollheim; W Sibley; A Thompson; S van den Noort; B Y Weinshenker; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  9 in total

1.  Prediction of high and low disease activity in early MS patients using multiple kernel learning identifies importance of lateral ventricle intensity.

Authors:  Claudia Chien; Moritz Seiler; Fabian Eitel; Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch; Friedemann Paul; Kerstin Ritter
Journal:  Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin       Date:  2022-07-03

Review 2.  Machine Learning Approaches in Study of Multiple Sclerosis Disease Through Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Faezeh Moazami; Alain Lefevre-Utile; Costas Papaloukas; Vassili Soumelis
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Uncovering convolutional neural network decisions for diagnosing multiple sclerosis on conventional MRI using layer-wise relevance propagation.

Authors:  Fabian Eitel; Emily Soehler; Judith Bellmann-Strobl; Alexander U Brandt; Klemens Ruprecht; René M Giess; Joseph Kuchling; Susanna Asseyer; Martin Weygandt; John-Dylan Haynes; Michael Scheel; Friedemann Paul; Kerstin Ritter
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 4.881

4.  SVM recursive feature elimination analyses of structural brain MRI predicts near-term relapses in patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Viktor Wottschel; Declan T Chard; Christian Enzinger; Massimo Filippi; Jette L Frederiksen; Claudio Gasperini; Antonio Giorgio; Maria A Rocca; Alex Rovira; Nicola De Stefano; Mar Tintoré; Daniel C Alexander; Frederik Barkhof; Olga Ciccarelli
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.881

5.  Machine learning in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: an improved predictive model for short-term disability progression.

Authors:  Marco Tk Law; Anthony L Traboulsee; David Kb Li; Robert L Carruthers; Mark S Freedman; Shanon H Kolind; Roger Tam
Journal:  Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin       Date:  2019-11-06

6.  Altered voxel-mirrored homotopic connectivity in right temporal lobe epilepsy as measured using resting-state fMRI and support vector machine analyses.

Authors:  Yongqiang Chu; Jun Wu; Du Wang; Junli Huang; Wei Li; Sheng Zhang; Hongwei Ren
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 5.435

7.  Modified connectivity of vulnerable brain nodes in multiple sclerosis, their impact on cognition and their discriminative value.

Authors:  Elisabeth Solana; Eloy Martinez-Heras; Jordi Casas-Roma; Laura Calvet; Elisabet Lopez-Soley; Maria Sepulveda; Nuria Sola-Valls; Carmen Montejo; Yolanda Blanco; Irene Pulido-Valdeolivas; Magi Andorra; Albert Saiz; Ferran Prados; Sara Llufriu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Opportunities for Understanding MS Mechanisms and Progression With MRI Using Large-Scale Data Sharing and Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Hugo Vrenken; Mark Jenkinson; Dzung L Pham; Charles R G Guttmann; Deborah Pareto; Michel Paardekooper; Alexandra de Sitter; Maria A Rocca; Viktor Wottschel; M Jorge Cardoso; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Evolution from a first clinical demyelinating event to multiple sclerosis in the REFLEX trial: Regional susceptibility in the conversion to multiple sclerosis at disease onset and its amenability to subcutaneous interferon beta-1a.

Authors:  Marco Battaglini; Hugo Vrenken; Riccardo Tappa Brocci; Giordano Gentile; Ludovico Luchetti; Adriaan Versteeg; Mark S Freedman; Bernard M J Uitdehaag; Ludwig Kappos; Giancarlo Comi; Andrea Seitzinger; Dominic Jack; Maria Pia Sormani; Frederik Barkhof; Nicola De Stefano
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 6.288

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.