AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate and compare the capacity of oligoclonal bands (OB) and three sets of MR imaging criteria to predict the conversion of clinically isolated syndromes (CIS) to clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients with CIS were prospectively studied with MR imaging and determination of OB. Based on the clinical follow-up (conversion or not conversion to CDMS), we calculated the sensitivity, specificity accuracy, positive and negative predictive value of the OB, and MR imaging criteria proposed by Paty et al, Fazekas et al and Barkhof et al. RESULTS: CDMS developed in 26 (23.2%) patients after a mean follow-up of 31 months (range 12-62). OB were positive in 70 (62.5%) patients and were associated with a higher risk of developing CDMS. OB showed a sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 43%, accuracy of 52%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 30% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 88%. Paty and Fazekas criteria showed the same results with a sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 51%, accuracy of 57%, positive predictive value of 32% and negative predictive value of 88%. Barkhof criteria showed a sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 70%, accuracy of 69%, PPV of 40% and NPV of 87%. The greatest accuracy was achieved when patients with positive OB and three or four Barkhof's criteria were selected. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a high prevalence of OB in CIS. OB and MR imaging (Paty's and Fazekas' criteria) have high sensitivity. Barkhof's criteria have a higher specificity. Both OB and MR imaging criteria have a high negative predictive value.
AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate and compare the capacity of oligoclonal bands (OB) and three sets of MR imaging criteria to predict the conversion of clinically isolated syndromes (CIS) to clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients with CIS were prospectively studied with MR imaging and determination of OB. Based on the clinical follow-up (conversion or not conversion to CDMS), we calculated the sensitivity, specificity accuracy, positive and negative predictive value of the OB, and MR imaging criteria proposed by Paty et al, Fazekas et al and Barkhof et al. RESULTS:CDMS developed in 26 (23.2%) patients after a mean follow-up of 31 months (range 12-62). OB were positive in 70 (62.5%) patients and were associated with a higher risk of developing CDMS. OB showed a sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 43%, accuracy of 52%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 30% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 88%. Paty and Fazekas criteria showed the same results with a sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 51%, accuracy of 57%, positive predictive value of 32% and negative predictive value of 88%. Barkhof criteria showed a sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 70%, accuracy of 69%, PPV of 40% and NPV of 87%. The greatest accuracy was achieved when patients with positive OB and three or four Barkhof's criteria were selected. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a high prevalence of OB in CIS. OB and MR imaging (Paty's and Fazekas' criteria) have high sensitivity. Barkhof's criteria have a higher specificity. Both OB and MR imaging criteria have a high negative predictive value.
Authors: Jean-Christophe Corvol; Daniel Pelletier; Roland G Henry; Stacy J Caillier; Joanne Wang; Derek Pappas; Simona Casazza; Darin T Okuda; Stephen L Hauser; Jorge R Oksenberg; Sergio E Baranzini Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-08-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kerstin Bendfeldt; Bernd Taschler; Laura Gaetano; Philip Madoerin; Pascal Kuster; Nicole Mueller-Lenke; Michael Amann; Hugo Vrenken; Viktor Wottschel; Frederik Barkhof; Stefan Borgwardt; Stefan Klöppel; Eva-Maria Wicklein; Ludwig Kappos; Gilles Edan; Mark S Freedman; Xavier Montalbán; Hans-Peter Hartung; Christoph Pohl; Rupert Sandbrink; Till Sprenger; Ernst-Wilhelm Radue; Jens Wuerfel; Thomas E Nichols Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Chris Polman; Ludwig Kappos; Mark S Freedman; Gilles Edan; Hans-Peter Hartung; David H Miller; Xavier Montalbán; Frederick Barkhof; Krzysztof Selmaj; Bernard M J Uitdehaag; Susanne Dahms; Lars Bauer; Christoph Pohl; Rupert Sandbrink Journal: J Neurol Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Johannes Brettschneider; Hayrettin Tumani; Ulrike Kiechle; Rainer Muche; Gayle Richards; Vera Lehmensiek; Albert C Ludolph; Markus Otto Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-11-05 Impact factor: 3.240