| Literature DB >> 30154854 |
Irene N Ogali1,2, Lucy W Wamuyu2, Jacqueline K Lichoti3, Erick O Mungube1, Bernard Agwanda4, Sheila C Ommeh2.
Abstract
Newcastle disease (ND) is a serious disease of poultry that causes significant economic losses. Despite rampant ND outbreaks that occur annually in Kenya, the information about the NDV circulating in Kenya is still scarce. We report the first countrywide study of NDV in Kenya. Our study is aimed at evaluating the genetic characteristics of Newcastle disease viruses obtained from backyard poultry in farms and live bird markets in different regions of Kenya. We sequenced and analyzed fusion (F) protein gene, including the cleavage site, of the obtained viruses. We aligned and compared study sequences with representative NDV of different genotypes from GenBank. The fusion protein cleavage site of all the study sequences had the motif 112RRQKRFV118 indicating their velogenic nature. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the NDV from various sites in Kenya was highly similar genetically and that it clustered together with NDV of genotype V. The study samples were 96% similar to previous Ugandan and Kenyan viruses grouped in subgenotype Vd This study points to possible circulation of NDV of similar genetic characteristics between backyard poultry farms and live bird markets in Kenya. The study also suggests the possible spread of velogenic NDV between Kenya and Uganda possibly through cross-border live bird trade. Our study provides baseline information on the genetic characteristics of NDV circulating in the Kenyan poultry population. This highlights the need for the ND control programmes to place more stringent measures on cross-border trade of live bird markets and poultry products to prevent the introduction of new strains of NDV that would otherwise be more difficult to control.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30154854 PMCID: PMC6098844 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2368597
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Microbiol
Number of birds sampled in live bird markets (LBMs) and backyard poultry farms (BPFs) in different regions of Kenya between 2014 and 2016.
| Region | Number and species of poultry sampled in BPFs and in LBMs | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPFs | LBMs | |||||||
| Chickens | Ducks | Turkeys | Pigeons | Total | Chickens | Ducks | Total | |
| Lake Victoria Basin | 288 | 27 | 24 | 21 | 360 | 95 | 4 | 99 |
| Western Highlands | 324 | 52 | 30 | 27 | 433 | 122 | 15 | 137 |
| Coast | 310 | 57 | 20 | 44 | 431 | 71 | 9 | 80 |
| Eastern | — | — | — | — | — | 64 | 0 | 64 |
| Nairobi metropolitan | — | — | — | — | — | 102 | 0 | 102 |
| Total | 922 | 136 | 74 | 92 | 1224 | 454 | 28 | 482 |
Figure 1Geographical location of NDV-positive backyard poultry farms and live bird markets in Kenya, from November 2014 to March 2016: (a) a map of Kenya showing the location of sampled and NDV-positive live bird markets; (b) a map of the study region in Western Kenya showing the location of sampled and NDV-positive backyard poultry farms; (c) a map of Coastal region showing the location of sampled and NDV-positive backyard poultry farms.
Newcastle disease virus detection by the molecular assay in backyard poultry farms (BPFs) and live bird markets (LBMs) in different regions of Kenya.
| Factor/variable | Poultry farms | Markets | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of samples ( | Number of NDV-positive samples ( | Proportion of positive samples (%) |
| Number of samples ( | Number of NDV-positive samples ( | Proportion of positive samples (%) |
| |
|
| ||||||||
| L. Victoria Basin |
| 21 | 5.8 (2.0–10.4) | 0.01 | 99 | 6 | 6.1 (2.4–14.3) | 0.003 |
| Western Highlands |
| 8 | 1.9 (1.1–8.2) | 0.257 | 137 | 16 | 11.7 (6.1–19.1) | 0.04 |
| Coast |
| 4 | 0.9 (0.4–2.5) | Ref. | 80 | 4 | 5.0 (1.7–15.8) | 0.004 |
| Eastern | — | — | — | — | 64 | 4 | 6.3 (2.1–16.9) | 0.01 |
| Nairobi metropolitan | — | — | — | — | 102 | 22 | 21.6 (14.7–30.6) | Ref. |
| Total | 1224 | 33 | 2.7 (1.9–3.8) | 0.001 | 482 | 52 | 10.8 (8.2–13.9) | — |
Figure 2Phylogenetic tree of partial fusion (F) gene nucleotide sequences of the Newcastle disease virus- (NDV-) positive study samples () and GenBank references. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches (only >50% is shown). The evolutionary history was inferred by using the maximum likelihood method based on the Kimura 2-parameter model. The gamma correction for rate heterogeneity was 0.4292. The analysis involved 111 nucleotide sequences. The tree is rooted using the NDV sequence belonging to Class I. There were a total of 521 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA 6 [31].
Figure 3Phylogenetic tree of nucleotide sequence of the complete fusion (F) gene of Newcastle disease virus (NDV) obtained in this study (marked ) and reference sequences from GenBank. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches (only >50% is shown). The evolutionary history was inferred by using the maximum likelihood method based on the Tamura Nei model [31]. The gamma correction for rate heterogeneity was 0.4141. The analysis involved 109 nucleotide sequences. The tree is rooted using the NDV sequence belonging to Class I. There were a total of 1662 positions in the final dataset. The analyses were conducted in MEGA 6.
Mean evolutionary distance between the complete nucleotide sequences of the fusion gene of the study sample, NDVs of genotype V, and the LaSota strain.
| Evolutionary distance1 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype | SS | Vd | Vb | Vc | Va | II |
| SS | — | [0.005] | [0.010] | [0.010] | [0.012] | [0.018] |
| Vd2 | 0.031 | — | [0.009] | [0.008] | [0.011] | [0.017] |
| Vb | 0.126 | 0.112 | — | [0.005] | [0.007] | [0.015] |
| Vc | 0.105 | 0.093 | 0.070 | — | [0.007] | [0.014] |
| Va | 0.142 | 0.127 | 0.099 | 0.090 | — | [0.017] |
| II | 0.235 | 0.224 | 0.213 | 0.186 | 0.224 | — |
|
| ||||||
| Vd (with SS) | — | — | [0.009] | [0.008] | [0.10] | [0.017] |
| Vb | — | 0.115 | — | [0.005] | [0.007] | [0.015] |
| Vc | — | 0.097 | 0.069 | — | [0.006] | [0.014] |
| Va | — | 0.130 | 0.099 | 0.089 | — | [0.016] |
| II | — | 0.226 | 0.213 | 0.186 | 0.224 | — |
1The number of base substitutions per site obtained by averaging all sequence pairs between subgenotypes of genotypes V and II (which are the common vaccine strains). The first half shows the evolutionary distance estimates obtained when the study sample (KE1007/2016: MG988405) is not included in subgenotype Vd, and the second half shows evolutionary distances when the study sample is included in subgenotype Vd. In total, 59 sequences were used: subgenotype Vd (n = 5), Vb (n = 12), Vc (n = 9), Va (n = 15), genotype II (n = 11), and the study sample. Values in square brackets are standard errors calculated by the bootstrap method (1000 replicates). Analysis was conducted using maximum composite likelihood analysis in MEGA 6. A total of 1662 positions were in the final dataset. 2Previous NDVs from Uganda classified under a new subgenotype Vd [32].