Literature DB >> 30153922

How standards and user involvement can improve app quality: A lifecycle approach.

Michelle Helena van Velthoven1, Jeremy C Wyatt2, Edward Meinert3, David Brindley3, Glenn Wells4.   

Abstract

Health apps have great potential to improve the quality of care and reduce costs, but this has not yet been achieved. Unfortunately, there are many low-quality, unsafe health apps, resulting in different types of risks. This Perspective addresses the current failure to adopt standards for the development and implementation of health apps. For each theoretical stage of the app development lifecycle we discuss problems, examples, reasons, and solutions. We believe that adapted versions of existing professional and technical standards and tools developed for clinical information systems, medical devices and medicines could help mitigate risks throughout the health app lifecycle. Adapted standards should bring more effective user involvement and cooperation amongst stakeholders. We argue that these efforts will ultimately provide users with a wider choice of higher-quality health apps, give healthcare providers access to better quality data, and allow developers to innovate without unnecessary time-consuming restrictions.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Digital health; Health apps; Medical device legislation [MeSH]; Mobile applications [MeSH]; Standards

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30153922     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  6 in total

1.  Understanding the user: Patients' perception, needs, and concerns of health apps for chronic constipation.

Authors:  V Vien Lee; Smrithi Vijayakumar; Ni Yin Lau; Agata Blasiak; Kewin Tien Ho Siah; Dean Ho
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-05-29

2.  How can clinicians, specialty societies and others evaluate and improve the quality of apps for patient use?

Authors:  Jeremy C Wyatt
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  Publicly available apps for cancer survivors: a scoping review.

Authors:  Rosalind Adam; Drew McMichael; Daniel Powell; Peter Murchie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Use of Apps to Promote Childhood Vaccination: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Michelle Helena Van Velthoven; Madison Milne-Ives; Caroline de Cock; Mary Mooney; Edward Meinert
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2020-02-05

5.  Usability of a Mobile Phone App Aimed at Adolescents and Young Adults During and After Cancer Treatment: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Signe Hanghøj; Kirsten A Boisen; Maiken Hjerming; Abbey Elsbernd; Helle Pappot
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2020-01-02

6.  Future Mobile Device Usage, Requirements, and Expectations of Physicians in German University Hospitals: Web-Based Survey.

Authors:  Oliver Maassen; Sebastian Fritsch; Julia Gantner; Saskia Deffge; Julian Kunze; Gernot Marx; Johannes Bickenbach
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.