OBJECTIVES: To provide mechanistic evidence for the epidemiological link between long-term use of alcohol-containing mouthwashes and oral cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Human epithelial keratinocytes were exposed for 30 s to concentrations of ethanol commonly present in mouthwashes. After a recovery period, cell viability was assessed with the MTT assay. RESULTS: A marked cytotoxic effect was observed for ethanol concentrations of 20% and above. CONCLUSIONS: The cytotoxicity of ethanol may explain the epidemiological association between mouthwash use and oral cancer. Evidence suggests that the risk of developing cancer in a tissue is strongly determined by the number of stem cell divisions accumulated by the tissue during a person's lifetime; cell division is a major source of mutations and other cancer-promoting errors. Since cell death activates the division of stem cells, the possible cytotoxicity of ethanol on the cells lining the oral mucosa will promote the division of the stem cells located in deeper layers to produce new cells to regenerate the damaged epithelium. If we regularly use mouthwashes containing cytotoxic concentrations of ethanol, the stem cells of the oral cavity may need to divide more often than usual and our risk of developing oral cancer may increase. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Many mouthwashes contain percentages of ethanol above 20%. Because ethanol is not crucial to prevent and reduce gingivitis and plaque, members of the dental team should consider the potential risk of oral cancer associated with frequent use of alcohol-containing mouthwashes when advising their patients.
OBJECTIVES: To provide mechanistic evidence for the epidemiological link between long-term use of alcohol-containing mouthwashes and oral cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Human epithelial keratinocytes were exposed for 30 s to concentrations of ethanol commonly present in mouthwashes. After a recovery period, cell viability was assessed with the MTT assay. RESULTS: A marked cytotoxic effect was observed for ethanol concentrations of 20% and above. CONCLUSIONS: The cytotoxicity of ethanol may explain the epidemiological association between mouthwash use and oral cancer. Evidence suggests that the risk of developing cancer in a tissue is strongly determined by the number of stem cell divisions accumulated by the tissue during a person's lifetime; cell division is a major source of mutations and other cancer-promoting errors. Since cell death activates the division of stem cells, the possible cytotoxicity of ethanol on the cells lining the oral mucosa will promote the division of the stem cells located in deeper layers to produce new cells to regenerate the damaged epithelium. If we regularly use mouthwashes containing cytotoxic concentrations of ethanol, the stem cells of the oral cavity may need to divide more often than usual and our risk of developing oral cancer may increase. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Many mouthwashes contain percentages of ethanol above 20%. Because ethanol is not crucial to prevent and reduce gingivitis and plaque, members of the dental team should consider the potential risk of oral cancer associated with frequent use of alcohol-containing mouthwashes when advising their patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer prevention; Carcinogenesis; Ethanol; Mouthrinses; Oral cavity; Oropharynx
Authors: D M Winn; W J Blot; J K McLaughlin; D F Austin; R S Greenberg; S Preston-Martin; J B Schoenberg; J F Fraumeni Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1991-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Paolo Boffetta; Richard B Hayes; Samantha Sartori; Yuan-Chin A Lee; Joshua Muscat; Andrew Olshan; Deborah M Winn; Xavier Castellsagué; Zuo-Feng Zhang; Hal Morgenstern; Chu Chen; Stephen M Schwartz; Thomas L Vaughan; Victor Wunsch-Filho; Mark Purdue; Sergio Koifman; Maria P Curado; Marta Vilensky; Maura Gillison; Leticia Fernandez; Ana Menezes; Alexander W Daudt; Stimson Schantz; Guopei Yu; Gypsyamber D'Souza; Robert I Haddad; Carlo La Vecchia; Mia Hashibe Journal: Eur J Cancer Prev Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Rebecca Moazzez; Hayley Thompson; Richard M Palmer; Ron F Wilson; Gordon B Proctor; William G Wade Journal: Eur J Oral Sci Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.612
Authors: V Bagnardi; M Rota; E Botteri; I Tramacere; F Islami; V Fedirko; L Scotti; M Jenab; F Turati; E Pasquali; C Pelucchi; C Galeone; R Bellocco; E Negri; G Corrao; P Boffetta; C La Vecchia Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Azeezat A Awoyemi; Christina Borchers; Langni Liu; Yanfang Chen; Christine M Rapp; Chad A Brewer; Ramzi Elased; Jeffrey B Travers Journal: Toxicol Lett Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 4.372
Authors: Hanaa Zbakh; Eva Zubía; Carolina de Los Reyes; José M Calderón-Montaño; Miguel López-Lázaro; Virginia Motilva Journal: Mar Drugs Date: 2020-04-11 Impact factor: 5.118