| Literature DB >> 30150158 |
Isacco Montroni1, Giampaolo Ugolini2, Nicole M Saur3, Antonino Spinelli4, Siri Rostoft5, Monica Millan6, Albert Wolthuis7, Ian R Daniels8, Roel Hompes9, Marta Penna10, Alois Fürst11, Demetris Papamichael12, Avni M Desai13, Stefano Cascinu14, Jean-Pierre Gèrard15, Arthur Sun Myint16, Valery E P P Lemmens17, Mariana Berho18, Mark Lawler19, Nicola De Liguori Carino20, Fabio Potenti21, Oriana Nanni22, Mattia Altini23, Geerard Beets24, Harm Rutten25, David Winchester26, Steven D Wexner21, Riccardo A Audisio27.
Abstract
With an expanding elderly population and median rectal cancer detection age of 70 years, the prevalence of rectal cancer in elderly patients is increasing. Management is based on evidence from younger patients, resulting in substandard treatments and poor outcomes. Modern management of rectal cancer in the elderly demands patient-centered treatment, assessing frailty rather than chronological age. The heterogeneity of this group, combined with the limited available data, impedes drafting evidence-based guidelines. Therefore, a multidisciplinary task force convened experts from the European Society of Surgical Oncology, European Society of Coloproctology, International Society of Geriatric Oncology and the American College Surgeons Commission on Cancer, with the goal of identifying the best practice to promote personalized rectal cancer care in older patients. A crucial element for personalized care was recognized as the routine screening for frailty and geriatrician involvement and personalized care for frail patients. Careful patient selection and improved surgical and perioperative techniques are responsible for a substantial improvement in rectal cancer outcomes. Therefore, properly selected patients should be considered for surgical resection. Local excision can be utilized when balancing oncologic outcomes, frailty and life expectancy. Watch and wait protocols, in expert hands, are valuable for selected patients and adjuncts can be added to improve complete response rates. Functional recovery and patient-reported outcomes are as important as oncologic-specific outcomes in this age group. The above recommendations and others were made based on the best-available evidence to guide the personalized treatment of elderly patients with rectal cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Elderly patients; Frailty; Functional recovery; Multidisciplinary; Recommendations; Rectal cancer
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30150158 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.08.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol ISSN: 0748-7983 Impact factor: 4.424