Literature DB >> 30150158

Personalized management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: Expert recommendations of the European Society of Surgical Oncology, European Society of Coloproctology, International Society of Geriatric Oncology, and American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer.

Isacco Montroni1, Giampaolo Ugolini2, Nicole M Saur3, Antonino Spinelli4, Siri Rostoft5, Monica Millan6, Albert Wolthuis7, Ian R Daniels8, Roel Hompes9, Marta Penna10, Alois Fürst11, Demetris Papamichael12, Avni M Desai13, Stefano Cascinu14, Jean-Pierre Gèrard15, Arthur Sun Myint16, Valery E P P Lemmens17, Mariana Berho18, Mark Lawler19, Nicola De Liguori Carino20, Fabio Potenti21, Oriana Nanni22, Mattia Altini23, Geerard Beets24, Harm Rutten25, David Winchester26, Steven D Wexner21, Riccardo A Audisio27.   

Abstract

With an expanding elderly population and median rectal cancer detection age of 70 years, the prevalence of rectal cancer in elderly patients is increasing. Management is based on evidence from younger patients, resulting in substandard treatments and poor outcomes. Modern management of rectal cancer in the elderly demands patient-centered treatment, assessing frailty rather than chronological age. The heterogeneity of this group, combined with the limited available data, impedes drafting evidence-based guidelines. Therefore, a multidisciplinary task force convened experts from the European Society of Surgical Oncology, European Society of Coloproctology, International Society of Geriatric Oncology and the American College Surgeons Commission on Cancer, with the goal of identifying the best practice to promote personalized rectal cancer care in older patients. A crucial element for personalized care was recognized as the routine screening for frailty and geriatrician involvement and personalized care for frail patients. Careful patient selection and improved surgical and perioperative techniques are responsible for a substantial improvement in rectal cancer outcomes. Therefore, properly selected patients should be considered for surgical resection. Local excision can be utilized when balancing oncologic outcomes, frailty and life expectancy. Watch and wait protocols, in expert hands, are valuable for selected patients and adjuncts can be added to improve complete response rates. Functional recovery and patient-reported outcomes are as important as oncologic-specific outcomes in this age group. The above recommendations and others were made based on the best-available evidence to guide the personalized treatment of elderly patients with rectal cancer.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly patients; Frailty; Functional recovery; Multidisciplinary; Recommendations; Rectal cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30150158     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  24 in total

1.  Baseline anaemia increases locally advanced rectal cancer mortality in older patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation.

Authors:  Darlene Rodrigues; Joana Simões; Laetitia Teixeira; Fátima Aires; Catarina Fernandes; Cármen Rey; Cristina Sarmento; Margarida Marques
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Risk factors of short-term survival in the aged in elective colon cancer surgery: a population-based study.

Authors:  Susanna Niemeläinen; Heini Huhtala; Anu Ehrlich; Jyrki Kössi; Esa Jämsen; Marja Hyöty
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Inflammation-based prognostic scores in geriatric patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  B Manoglu; S Sokmen; T Bisgin; H S Semiz; I B Görken; H Ellidokuz
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.699

Review 4.  Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies), and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) International Consensus Project.

Authors:  Mauro Podda; Patricia Sylla; Gianluca Baiocchi; Michel Adamina; Vanni Agnoletti; Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Alberto Arezzo; Nicola Avenia; Walter Biffl; Antonio Biondi; Simona Bui; Fabio C Campanile; Paolo Carcoforo; Claudia Commisso; Antonio Crucitti; Nicola De'Angelis; Gian Luigi De'Angelis; Massimo De Filippo; Belinda De Simone; Salomone Di Saverio; Giorgio Ercolani; Gustavo P Fraga; Francesco Gabrielli; Federica Gaiani; Mario Guerrieri; Angelo Guttadauro; Yoram Kluger; Ari K Leppaniemi; Andrea Loffredo; Tiziana Meschi; Ernest E Moore; Monica Ortenzi; Francesco Pata; Dario Parini; Adolfo Pisanu; Gilberto Poggioli; Andrea Polistena; Alessandro Puzziello; Fabio Rondelli; Massimo Sartelli; Neil Smart; Michael E Sugrue; Patricia Tejedor; Marco Vacante; Federico Coccolini; Justin Davies; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Rectal Cancer Surgery in Patients Older Than 80 Years: Is Hartmann's Procedure Safe?

Authors:  Kenta Iguchi; Hiroyuki Mushiake; Seiji Hasegawa; Daisuke Inagaki; Tadao Fukushima; Masakatsu Numata; Hiroshi Tamagawa; Norio Yukawa; Yasushi Rino; Munetaka Masuda
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Quality of Life in Older Adults After Major Cancer Surgery: The GOSAFE International Study.

Authors:  Isacco Montroni; Giampaolo Ugolini; Nicole M Saur; Siri Rostoft; Antonino Spinelli; Barbara L Van Leeuwen; Nicola De Liguori Carino; Federico Ghignone; Michael T Jaklitsch; Ponnandai Somasundar; Anna Garutti; Chiara Zingaretti; Flavia Foca; Bernadette Vertogen; Oriana Nanni; Steven D Wexner; Riccardo A Audisio
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 11.816

7.  Improving quality of care and clinical outcomes for rectal cancer through clinical audits in a multicentre cancer care organisation.

Authors:  M G Torras; E Canals; C Muñoz-Montplet; A Vidal; D Jurado; A Eraso; S Villà; M Caro; J Molero; M Macià; M Puigdemont; E González-Muñoz; A López; F Guedea; J M Borras
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 8.  Considerations in Surgical Management of Gastrointestinal Cancer in Older Patients.

Authors:  Nicole M Saur; Isacco Montroni; Riccardo A Audisio
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Surgical and functional outcomes and survival following Colon Cancer surgery in the aged: a study protocol for a prospective, observational multicentre study.

Authors:  Susanna Niemeläinen; Heini Huhtala; Anu Ehrlich; Jyrki Kössi; Esa Jämsen; Marja Hyöty
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  What Should We Recommend for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Adults Aged 75 and Older?

Authors:  Anuj Arora; Sami A Chadi; Tyler Chesney
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.