Literature DB >> 30149596

The Concentration of BTEX in the Air of Tehran: A Systematic Review-Meta Analysis and Risk Assessment.

Mehrnoosh Abtahi1, Yadolah Fakhri2, Gea Oliveri Conti3, Margherita Ferrante4, Mahmoud Taghavi5, Javad Tavakoli6, Ali Heshmati7, Hassan Keramati8, Bigard Moradi9, Nazak Amanidaz10, Amin Mousavi Khaneghah11.   

Abstract

In the current study, the concentration of some pollutants which are categorized as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including benzene (B), toluene (T), ethylbenzene (E), and o-xylenes (o-X), in the air of Tehran was evaluated by the aid of a systematic review and meta-analysis approach. Also, the health risk for the exposed population was estimated using the recommended methods by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The rank order based on their concentration in BTEX was benzene (149.18 µg/m³: 31%) > o-xylene (127.16 µg/m³: 27%) > ethylbenzene (110.15 µg/m³: 23%) > toluene (87.97 µg/m³: 19%). The ratio B/T in this study was calculated as 1.69, repressing that both stationary and mobile sources of emission can be considered as the main sources for benzene and toluene. Moreover, strong photochemical activity in Tehran was demonstrated by the high ratio of E/o-X. Meta-regression indicates that the concentration of BTEX has insignificantly (p-value > 0.05) increased over time. The BTEX compounds based on the target hazard quotient (THQ) were ordered as benzene > o-xylene > ethylbenzene > toluene. Percentile 95% of THQ due to benzene (4.973) and o-xylene (1.272) was higher than a value of 1. Percentile 95% excessive cancer risk (ECR) for benzene (1.25 × 10⁶) and ethylbenzene (1.11 × 10⁶) was higher than a value of 1.00 × 10⁶. The health risk assessment indicated that the population of Tehran are at considerable non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30149596      PMCID: PMC6163851          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15091837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


1. Introduction

The air quality in urban areas depends on different factors such as atmospheric dispersion conditions, solar radiation, meteorological factors, geographical factors, deposition, and pollutant emissions [1]. In the last few decades, with increases in urbanization and developments in human life, the issue of air pollution has attracted considerable attention [2,3]. The primary sources of air pollution in urban regions can be summarized as natural and anthropogenic sources [4,5]. In this context, air pollutants such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), sulfur oxides (SOx), ozone (O3), carbon oxides (COs), particulate matter (PM), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and radioactive pollutants are released from these sources [5,6]. The main sources of VOCs are anthropogenic and biogenic sources [7], including incomplete combustion in motor vehicles (fossil fuels), the petrochemical process, the fabrication of rubber and resin, solvents, and paint industries [8,9]. The presence of VOCs in a variety of forms such as toluene, benzene, ethylbenzene, and meta (m), para (p), and ortho(o) xylene in the indoor or outdoor air is important issue due to the consequence of non-carcinogenic risks (e.g., neurological impairment, allergy, nose and eye irritation, kidney and liver dysfunction, and heart disease) [10,11,12] and carcinogenic risks (e.g., lung cancer and leukemia) [13,14,15,16]. Among VOCs, benzene, as a hazardous compound with a relatively long lifetime, belongs to group 1; carcinogenic to humans [17,18]. Whilst the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes have not been proven [19,20], they are precursors of toxic radical in the atmosphere [21]. In this regard, in addition to direct adverse health effects of BTEX, they can be classified as the main precursors of the production of secondary pollutants by photochemical reactions such as proxy acetyl nitrate (PAN) and O3, which can endanger human health [4,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Several investigations have been performed regarding measuring the concentration of ambient BTEX around the world and also to assess the quality and quantity of air pollutants and their effects on human health [24,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. In this regard, useful information considering ratios used for determining photochemical activity in the atmosphere, as well as the sources of substances such as benzene/toluene (B/T) and ethylbenzene/m, p-xylene (E/X), were provided [8]. Although Tehran, with more than nine million permanent people and three million floating people, was designed for more than 750,000 motor vehicles, more than four million motor vehicles are moving in this metropolitan [35]. Besides, several factories are located in southern Tehran, with the emission of various pollutants into the ambient air [36]. Despite a high number of conducted studies regarding the concentration and numerous emission sources for BTEX in Tehran ambient air [37,38,39,40,41,42,43], no systematic review and meta-analysis study has been conducted to assess the related health risks. Therefore, for the first time, in the current study, the carcinogenesis and non-carcinogenesis risks of BTEX pollutants in Tehran will be assessed by using a systematic review and meta-analysis approach.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Strategy of Search

The search strategy was performed to obtain all citations regarding the concentration of BTEX in the air of Tehran between 2005 to 2018. The systematic review was conducted based on the Cochrane method [44] using international databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, and national databases including the Scientific Information Database (SID). The following keywords were used: (a) PubMed (Medline): ((((((((((benzene[Tit/Abs]) OR toluene[Tit/Abs]) OR ethylbenzene[Tit/Abs]) OR xylene[Tit/Abs]) OR BTEX[Tit/Abs]) OR volatile organic compound[Tit/Abs])) AND (((air pollution[Tit/Abs]) OR ambient air[Tit/Abs]) OR outdoor air[Tit/Abs])) OR air pollution[MeSH Terms]) AND Iran[Tit/Abs]) OR Iran[MeSH Terms]; (b) Scopus: ((keyword (benzene) or keyword (toluene) or keyword (ethylbenzene) or keyword (xylene) or keyword (BTEX) or keyword (volatile and organic and compound))) and ((keyword (air and pollution) or keyword (ambient and air) or keyword (outdoor and air))) and (keyword (Iran)); Embase: ‘benzene’:ab,ti OR ‘toluene’:ab,ti OR ‘ethylbenzene’:ab,ti OR ‘xylene’:ab,ti OR ‘btex’:ab,ti OR ‘volatile organic compound’:ab,ti AND ‘air pollution’/exp OR ‘air pollution’ OR ‘ambient air’:ab,ti OR ‘outdoor air’/exp OR ‘outdoor air’ AND ‘IRAN’:ab,ti. Thirteen years (1 January 2005 and 11 June 2018) was selected as the period of investigation.

2.2. Screening of Articles

The evaluation of initially retrieved articles was performed independently according to (1) title, (2) abstract, and (3) full-text of the articles [45,46]. According to the title and abstract, some articles that did not perform investigations on the concentration of BTEX in the air of Tehran were excluded. The full text of the obtained papers was downloaded, after the abstract screening. Criteria for including articles were: (1) descriptive study on the contamination of BTEX; (2) full text available; (3) original studies; and (4) reporting of the concentration of BTEX in ambient air in Tehran. Disagreement among two of the authors was resolved by discussion; otherwise, a third author decided. A reference list of retrieved articles was also checked to obtain more articles. The required management of obtained references was carried out using EndNote X7® (Thomson Reuters, Toronto, Canada) software [46].

2.3. Data Extraction and Definitions

The collected data from each article can be summarized as sampling date, type of monitoring station, number of monitoring stations, sample size, the concentration of BTEX, the method of detection, the limit of detection, and the limit of quantitation (Table 1). BTEX represents volatile chemicals including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene that are emitted from crude oil, natural gas, and petroleum deposits [47]. In this regard, because of the majority of studies performed on O-xylene, it was extracted from obtained articles.
Table 1

Main characteristics included in the study.

Sampling DateType of Monitoring StationMonitoring Station NumberSample SizeConcentrationMethod of DetectionRef
BenzeneTolueneEthyl BenzeneO-Xylene
Start TimeEnd TimeAverageSDAverageSDAverageSDAverageSD
23-November22-December-2007Urban17016.575.869.111.165.081.675.961.89VOC71M-PID[37]
10-December9-January-2008Urban17063.2411.197.61.7838.269.0814.133.29VOC71M-PID[37]
1-December30-December-2015Urban1206698464711191624GC/FID[38]
JulySeptember-2010Urban149485.52NM 1NMNMNMNMNMNMNM[39]
5-April-201025-March-2011Traffic168014.513.17NMNMNMNMNMNMVOC71M-PID[40]
FebruaryJuly-2015Urban46360238NM13062.0469NM118NMGC/FID[41]
November-2014March-2015Traffic110028.969.1229.559.7328.6112.228.412.01GC/FID[42]
March-2012March-2013Urban7301.056NM4.291NM0.837NM1.044NMGC/FID[43]

1 Not Mentioned.

2.4. Meta-Analysis

While the heterogeneity was higher than 50%, the random effect model (REM) was used to estimate the pooled concentration of BTEX in ambient air [45,48]. The standard error (SE) of the concentration of BTEX was calculated using standard deviation and sample size (SE = SD/√n) [45]. According to the mean and standard error, the pooled concentration of BTEX was estimated [49,50]. All data were analyzed using STATA 14.0 statistical software (College Station, TX, USA). p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

2.5. Health Risk Assessment

2.5.1. Non-Carcinogenic Risk

In the current study, according to part A and B of the risk assessment manual of EPA, the exposure dose to BTEX in ambient air was estimated [51]. Dose exposure via the inhalation [exposure concentration (EC)] pathway was calculated by Equation (1) [52,53]. All parameters used in this equation are presented in Table 2.
Table 2

Parameters included in the health risk assessment due to the exposure inhalation pathway.

ParameterDefineUnitValueReference
ECChronic and sub-chronic exposure concentrationµg m−3[54]
CConcentrationmg m3
THQTarget Hazard QuotientUnitless[54]
TTHQTotal target Hazard QuotientUnitless
IURBapInhalation unit risk((mg m3)−1)Benzene: 7.8 × 106Ethylbenzene: 2.5 × 106[55]
ECRExcessive cancer riskUnitlessBenzene: 0.030[55]
RfCiInhalation reference concentrationsmg m−3Toluene: 5.000 Ethylbenzene: 1.000 O-Xylene: 0.100[55]
EFExposure frequencyday year−1180[56]
EDExposure durationyearAdults: 24[57]
ETExposure timehour day−124[52]
ATnAveraging timedaysATn = Non-carcinogens: ED × EF days[58]
IURInhalation unit risk(µg m3)1Benzene = 7.80 × 106Ethylbenzene = 2.50 × 106[55]
1000Convert factor mg to µg
The conversion of the concentration from ppb to µg/m3 for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and o-xylene was performed using 3.243, 0.843, 19.45, and 4.33 convert coefficients, respectively [59]. To estimate the non-carcinogenic risk of BTEX in the ambient air, the target hazard quotient (THQ) was calculated using Equation (2) [51]: The total target hazard quotient (TTHQ) is equal to the sum of individual THQ [60,61,62,63,64,65,66]. The TTHQ of BTEX was calculated by Equation (3):TTHQ = THQ When THQ and/or TTHQ is lower than or equal to a value of 1, the population are not at a significant non-carcinogenic risk [17].

2.5.2. Carcinogenic Risk

The carcinogenic risk of benzene and ethylbenzene in adults and children was estimated using Equation (4): The related parameters of Equations (1)–(4) are shown in Table 2. When the ECR value of benzene and ethylbenzene is lower than 1.00 × 106, between 1.00 × 106 to 1.00 × 104, and higher than 1.00 × 104, the exposed population are at no considerable, threshold, and considerable cancer risk, respectively [54]. In the current study, the cut off point for endangering the population was a percentile of 95% (worse scenario) of THQ and ECR [65].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Process of Select Papers

Among the 230 papers obtained published from 2005 to 2018 from all databases including PubMed (n = 83), Scopus (n = 66), Embased (n = 53), and SID (n = 28) in the identification step, 121 papers were excluded due to duplication. After the assessment of titles, 48 papers were regarded as unsuitable. The abstracts of 61 papers were checked, and 23 papers were excluded. Then, the full texts of the 38 papers were reviewed and finally, seven papers with 1678 samples were included in the current study (Figure 1).
Figure 1

The selection process of articles and inclusion.

3.2. Concentration of BTEX

The pooled concentration (ppb) of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and o-xylenes, is demonstrated in Figure 2a–d. The pooled concentration of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and o-xylenes was 46.54 ppb (95% CI: 41.87–51.30 ppb), 23.65 ppb (95% CI: 19.62–27.68 ppb), 25.70 ppb (95% CI: 17.80–33.63 ppb), and 29.43 ppb (95% CI: 22.57–36.29 ppb), respectively. Also, the total BTEX concentration was measured as 125.13 ppb or 474.45 ± 29.93 µg/m3. The rank order based on their contribution in BTEX was benzene (46.54 ppb or 149.18 µg/m3: 31%) > o-xylene (29.43 ppb or 127.16 µg/m3: 27%) > ethylbenzene (25.70 ppb or 110.15 µg/m3: 23%) > toluene (23.65 ppb or 87.97 µg/m3: 19%) (Figure 3).
Figure 2

Forest plot of concentration (ppb) of benzene (a), toluene (b), ethylbenzene (c), and o-xylene (d) in the ambient air of Tehran. ES: effect size, CI: Confidence interval.

Figure 3

The percentage of BTEX in the ambient air of Tehran.

A comparison of the concentration of BTEX in Tehran with other urban areas in the world is presented in Table 3. According to our findings, the pooled concentrations of benzene (149.18 µg/m3) and o-xylene (125.57 µg/m3) in Tehran were higher than those in other cities around the world (Table 3) [6,33,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74] (Table 3).
Table 3

A comparison of the concentration of BTEX in ambient air of Tehran with other regions in the world (µg/m3).

City/CountrySample SizeMonitoring PeriodsBenzeneTolueneEthylbenzeneO-Xylene MethodType of SourceReferences
Bari/ItalyNM 1April, September and October 20082.29 ± 1.594.76 ± 3.410.92 ± 0.661.3 ± 0.94GC/MSUrban[67]
18 areas/CanadaNMSeptember 2009 and December 20110.581.550.240.24GC/MSUrban[68]
Aliaga/Western Turkey132005 and 20070.68 ± 0.681.6 ± 1.10.25 ± 0.170.16 ± 0.13GC/FIDUrban[69]
Kocaeli/Turkey49July 20062.26 ± 3.2035.51 ± 39.559.72 ± 9.2012.46 ± 12.46GC/FIDUrban[6]
Beijing/China4126 February and 7 March 20131.73 ± 1.682.21 ± 2.100.38 ± 0.380.19 ± 0.17GC/FIDUrban[70]
Orleans/France56Winter 20110.950.270.950.14(TD–GC–MSD)Semi-urban[33]
Navarra/Spain932June 2006 to June 20072.8413.262.152.63GC/MSUrban[71]
Sarnia/Canada372004–20050.932.540.460.49GC/MSUrban[72]
Windsor/Canada422004–20050.762.880.440.45GC/MSUrban[72]
Kuala Lumpur/Malaysia28December 2013 and January 201458.374113.805661.3NMGC/MSUrban[73]
Seoul/South Korea800320042.82932.7680.75NMGC/FIDUrban[74]
Present study 1678 2007–2015 149.18 87.97 110.12 127.14

1 Not Mentioned.

The concentration of toluene in Tehran (87.97 µg/m3) was lower than that in Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur) (113.805 µg/m3) [73], but higher than other cities [6,33,67,68,69,70,71,72,74]. However, the concentration of ethylbenzene (110.12 µg/m3) in Tehran was lower than the reported value for Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur) (661.3 µg/m3) [73], but was lower than other cities (Table 3) [6,33,67,68,69,70,71,72,74]. The toluene levels in Italy (Bari) (4.76 ± 3.41 µg/m3), Canada (Sarnia) (2.88 µg/m3), Turkey (Kocaeli) (35.51 ± 39.55 µg/m3), China (Beijing) (2.21 ± 2.10 µg/m3), and Spain (Navarra) (13.26 µg/m3) were higher than other VOC compounds (Table 3) [6,67,68,69,70,71,72]; however, the concentrations of ethylbenzene in South Korea (Seoul) (80.75 µg/m3) and Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur) (661.3 µg/m3) were higher than other VOC compounds [33,73,74] (Table 3). The concentration of BTEX in ambient air of Tehran was higher than many urban regions in the world (Table 3). The inversion phenomenon was mentioned as one of the leading causes of the high concentration of BTEX in Tehran [37,38,40,42]. It occurs in the cold seasons that cause ambient air pollutants such as VOCs to become trapped in the surface layer of the Earth, which can result in intensifying air pollution levels [37]. In addition to the inversion phenomenon, fossil fuel consumption of old vehicles, low-quality fuel, population congestion, non-standard streets, and highways, besides several factories in the south of Tehran such as iron and steel industries, are other reasons for the high level of BTEX in Tehran city [37,38,40,42]. The higher concentration of toluene and ethylbenzene in Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur) compared with Tehran is due to the higher evaporation of petrol vapors (gasoline evaporation) and emission of higher concentrations of toluene and ethylbenzene by motor vehicles [73].

3.3. The Ratio between BTEX Compounds

The ratios of benzene/toluene (B/T) and ethylbenzene/m, p-xylene (E/X) can be used to assess the photochemical activity in the atmosphere and sources [8,75]. The ratio between BTEX compounds is the main parameter for discovering the emission sources of BTEX in the outdoor air [76,77]. The calculated B/T ratio in the range of 0.23–0.66 shows that vehicles and traffic are the main emission sources of toluene and benzene in the ambient air of Tehran [8,75,78,79]. The B/T ratio lower than this range indicates that toluene and benzene mainly originated from stationary sources. Likewise, if the B/T ratio is higher than this range, stationary (factory) and mobile (Motorcycle and car) sources are the main sources of emission [8,75]. Ratios of benzene/toluene (B/T) and ethylbenzene/o-xylene (E/o-X) in Tehran and other areas are presented in Table 4.
Table 4

Comparison of benzene/toluene (B/T) and ethylbenzene/o-xylene (E/o-X) concentration ratio in Tehran and other areas.

Area StudyB/TE/O-XReferences
Guangzhou/China0.35 [28]
Hong Kong/China0.13 [80]
Helsinki/Finland0.36 [81]
Munich/Germany0.53 [82]
Louis/India0.93 [83]
Paris/France0.15 [32]
London/English0.65 [84]
Seoul/South Korea0.13 [25]
Beijing/China0.71 [85]
Beijing/China0.87 [24]
Bari/Italy0.480.71[67]
18 areas/Canada0.371.00[68]
Aliaga/Western Turkey0.431.56[69]
Kocaeli/Turkey0.060.78[6]
Beijing/China0.782.00[70]
Orleans/France3.496.50[33]
Navarra/Spain0.210.82[71]
Sarnia/Canada0.370.94[72]
Windsor/Canada0.260.98[72]
Kuala Lumpur/Malaysia0.51 [73]
Tehran/Iran1.690.86Present study
The B/T ratio in this study was 1.69, which was higher than 0.23–0.66, representing that the primary sources of benzene and toluene could be both stationary and mobile sources of emission. Similar to our study, the B/T ratio in ambient air in France (Orleans) and China (Beijing) was higher than the B/T ratio in this study (0.66) [24,33,70,85]. The B/T ratio in ambient air of China (Hong Kong), France (Paris), South Korea (Seoul), Turkey (Kocaeli), and Spain (Navarra) [25,32,70,71,80] was lower than 0.23, indicating that toluene and benzene mainly originated from stationary sources [8,75]. The ratio of E/X is a good indicator that indicates the degree of photochemical reactions [86,87]. A higher ratio of E/X than Spain (Navarra: 0.82), Turkey (Kocaeli: 0.78), and Italy (Bari: 0.71) shows that photochemical activity in the ambient air of Tehran is stronger than in Spain, Turkey, and Italy (Table 4) [88].

3.4. Health Risk Assessment

3.4.1. Non-Carcinogenic Risk Assessment

Non-Carcinogenic Risk BTEX compounds are presented in Table 5. Percentile 95% of THQ of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and o-xylene was determined as 5.342, 0.021, 0.142, and 1.522, respectively (Table 5). The rank order of BTEX compounds based on THQ was benzene > o-xylene > ethylbenzene > toluene. THQ of benzene was higher than other VOC compounds because the concentration of benzene was the highest (Table 5), and also its RfCi was the lowest [55].
Table 5

Non-carcinogenic risk due to the inhalation of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and o-xylene.

VOCs CompoundsC (Mean)C (P95%)EC (Mean)EC (P95%)RfCiTHQ (Mean)THQ (P95%)
µg/m−3µg/m−3mg/m3
Benzene149.178160.270.1490.1600.034.9735.342
Toluene87.9701070.0880.1075.000.0180.021
Ethylbenzene110.1501420.1100.1421.000.1100.142
O-Xylene127.160152.20.1270.1520.101.2721.522
Percentile 95% of THQ of benzene and o-xylene was higher than the value of 1. Also, TTHQ values based on mean and percentile 95% was 6.37 and 7.07, respectively, which were higher than a value of 1 (Figure 4). The health risk assessment shows that the residents of Tehran are at a considerable non-carcinogenic risk (THQ and TTHQ > 1 value). THQ values of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and o-xylene in the China (Beijing) city were 3.2 × 102, 3.37 × 104, 3.19 × 104, and 1.5 × 103, respectively [70], which were lower than Tehran city. The lower concentration of BTEX in ambient air of China (Beijing) city (Table 3) was the main source of the lower non-carcinogenic risk when compared to Tehran city.
Figure 4

TTHQ of BTEX in ambient air due to inhalation exposed population.

3.4.2. Carcinogenic Risk Assessment

The result of the carcinogenic risk assessment of benzene and ethylbenzene is presented in Table 6. Percentile 95% ECR of benzene and ethylbenzene was 1.25 × 106 and 1.11 × 106, respectively (Table 6). Also, percentile 95% ECR of benzene and ethylbenzene was higher than the value of 1.00 × 106. In this context, the population of Tehran is at considerable carcinogenic risk. These outcomes of the health risk assessment show that strict monitoring needs to be performed to control the concentration of BTEX in ambient air in Tehran city and BTEX standards should be revised as soon as possible.
Table 6

Carcinogenic risk due to the inhalation of benzene and ethylbenzene.

VOCs CompoundsEC (Mean)EC (P95%)IURECR (Mean)ECR (P95%)
Benzene0.1490.1607.80 × 1061.16 × 1061.25 × 106
Ethylbenzene0.1100.1422.50 × 1068.59 × 1071.11 × 106

4. Conclusions

In the current study, the concentration of BTEX in Tehran ambient air was estimated based on a systematic review and meta-analysis approach and the non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks in the exposed population were estimated. The rank order of BTEX based on their concentration was benzene > o-xylene > ethylbenzene > toluene. The primary sources of benzene and toluene in ambient air of Tehran include both mobile and stationary sources of emission. Also, strong photochemical activities in the ambient air of Tehran were assumed. A health risk assessment based on the worse scenario (Percentile 95% THQ and ECR) indicated that the population of Tehran are at considerable non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks. Therefore, to reduce the health risks of BTEX, emission reduction plans should be implemented.
  39 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and health risk assessment of arsenic and lead in the fished shrimps from the Persian gulf.

Authors:  Yadolah Fakhri; Anoushiravan Mohseni-Bandpei; Gea Oliveri Conti; Margherita Ferrante; Antonio Cristaldi; Ali Khani Jeihooni; Maryam Karimi Dehkordi; Abdolazim Alinejad; Hassan Rasoulzadeh; Seyed Mohsen Mohseni; Maryam Sarkhosh; Hassan Keramati; Bigard Moradi; Nazak Amanidaz; Zahra Baninameh
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.023

2.  Serious BTEX pollution in rural area of the North China Plain during winter season.

Authors:  Kankan Liu; Chenglong Zhang; Ye Cheng; Chengtang Liu; Hongxing Zhang; Gen Zhang; Xu Sun; Yujing Mu
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 5.565

3.  Number and size distribution of airborne nanoparticles during summertime in Kuwait: first observations from the Middle East.

Authors:  Abdullah N Al-Dabbous; Prashant Kumar
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Impact of unit operations during processing of cereal-based products on the levels of deoxynivalenol, total aflatoxin, ochratoxin A, and zearalenone: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amin Mousavi Khaneghah; Yadolah Fakhri; Anderson S Sant'Ana
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 7.514

5.  Levels, sources and health risks of carbonyls and BTEX in the ambient air of Beijing, China.

Authors:  Yujie Zhang; Yujing Mu; Junfeng Liu; Abdelwahid Mellouki
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 5.565

6.  Seasonal and diurnal variations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere of Hong Kong.

Authors:  K F Ho; S C Lee; H Guo; W Y Tsai
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Meta-analysis of skewed data: combining results reported on log-transformed or raw scales.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Ian R White; Judith Anzures-Cabrera
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Seasonal and diurnal variations of BTEX compounds in the semi-urban environment of Orleans, France.

Authors:  Zhaohui Jiang; Benoît Grosselin; Véronique Daële; Abdelwahid Mellouki; Yujing Mu
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Spatial and temporal variation of BTEX in the urban atmosphere of Delhi, India.

Authors:  Raza Rafiqul Hoque; P S Khillare; Tripti Agarwal; Vijay Shridhar; S Balachandran
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Air quality nearby road traffic tunnel portals: BTEX monitoring.

Authors:  Fabio Murena
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.565

View more
  7 in total

1.  The influence of processing and clarifier agents on the concentrations of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in pekmez (a grape molasses-like syrup).

Authors:  Ali Heshmati; Sabah Ghadimi; Akram Ranjbar; Amin Mousavi Khaneghah
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The concentration of heavy metals in noodle samples from Iran's market: probabilistic health risk assessment.

Authors:  Behrouz Tajdar-Oranj; Nabi Shariatifar; Mahmood Alimohammadi; Leila Peivasteh-Roudsari; Gholamreza Jahed Khaniki; Yadolah Fakhri; Amin Mousavi Khaneghah
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Nitrate in groundwater and agricultural products: intake and risk assessment in northeastern Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Zendehbad; Majid Mostaghelchi; Mohsen Mojganfar; Peter Cepuder; Willibald Loiskandl
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 5.190

4.  Diurnal variation of BTEX at road traffic intersection points in Delhi, India: source, ozone formation potential, and health risk assessment.

Authors:  Dudun Mehta; Naba Hazarika; Arun Srivastava
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-18       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  In Plasma Catalytic Oxidation of Toluene Using Monolith CuO Foam as a Catalyst in a Wedged High Voltage Electrode Dielectric Barrier Discharge Reactor: Influence of Reaction Parameters and Byproduct Control.

Authors:  Juexiu Li; Hongbo Zhang; Diwen Ying; Yalin Wang; Tonghua Sun; Jinping Jia
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Study of nitrate levels in fruits and vegetables to assess the potential health risks in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Rayhan Uddin; Mostak Uddin Thakur; Mohammad Zia Uddin; G M Rabiul Islam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Seasonality Impact of the BTEX Pollution on the Atmosphere of Arad City, Romania.

Authors:  Corina Popitanu; Gabriela Cioca; Lucian Copolovici; Dennis Iosif; Florentina-Daniela Munteanu; Dana Copolovici
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.