| Literature DB >> 30149596 |
Mehrnoosh Abtahi1, Yadolah Fakhri2, Gea Oliveri Conti3, Margherita Ferrante4, Mahmoud Taghavi5, Javad Tavakoli6, Ali Heshmati7, Hassan Keramati8, Bigard Moradi9, Nazak Amanidaz10, Amin Mousavi Khaneghah11.
Abstract
In the current study, the concentration of some pollutants which are categorized as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including benzene (B), toluene (T), ethylbenzene (E), and o-xylenes (o-X), in the air of Tehran was evaluated by the aid of a systematic review and meta-analysis approach. Also, the health risk for the exposed population was estimated using the recommended methods by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The rank order based on their concentration in BTEX was benzene (149.18 µg/m³: 31%) > o-xylene (127.16 µg/m³: 27%) > ethylbenzene (110.15 µg/m³: 23%) > toluene (87.97 µg/m³: 19%). The ratio B/T in this study was calculated as 1.69, repressing that both stationary and mobile sources of emission can be considered as the main sources for benzene and toluene. Moreover, strong photochemical activity in Tehran was demonstrated by the high ratio of E/o-X. Meta-regression indicates that the concentration of BTEX has insignificantly (p-value > 0.05) increased over time. The BTEX compounds based on the target hazard quotient (THQ) were ordered as benzene > o-xylene > ethylbenzene > toluene. Percentile 95% of THQ due to benzene (4.973) and o-xylene (1.272) was higher than a value of 1. Percentile 95% excessive cancer risk (ECR) for benzene (1.25 × 10⁶) and ethylbenzene (1.11 × 10⁶) was higher than a value of 1.00 × 10⁶. The health risk assessment indicated that the population of Tehran are at considerable non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30149596 PMCID: PMC6163851 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15091837
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Main characteristics included in the study.
| Sampling Date | Type of Monitoring Station | Monitoring Station Number | Sample Size | Concentration | Method of Detection | Ref | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benzene | Toluene | Ethyl Benzene | O-Xylene | |||||||||||
| Start Time | End Time | Average | SD | Average | SD | Average | SD | Average | SD | |||||
| 23-November | 22-December-2007 | Urban | 1 | 70 | 16.57 | 5.86 | 9.11 | 1.16 | 5.08 | 1.67 | 5.96 | 1.89 | VOC71M-PID | [ |
| 10-December | 9-January-2008 | Urban | 1 | 70 | 63.24 | 11.19 | 7.6 | 1.78 | 38.26 | 9.08 | 14.13 | 3.29 | VOC71M-PID | [ |
| 1-December | 30-December-2015 | Urban | 1 | 20 | 66 | 98 | 46 | 47 | 11 | 19 | 16 | 24 | GC/FID | [ |
| July | September-2010 | Urban | 14 | 948 | 5.52 | NM 1 | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | [ |
| 5-April-2010 | 25-March-2011 | Traffic | 16 | 80 | 14.51 | 3.17 | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | VOC71M-PID | [ |
| February | July-2015 | Urban | 46 | 360 | 238 | NM | 130 | 62.04 | 69 | NM | 118 | NM | GC/FID | [ |
| November-2014 | March-2015 | Traffic | 1 | 100 | 28.96 | 9.12 | 29.55 | 9.73 | 28.61 | 12.2 | 28.4 | 12.01 | GC/FID | [ |
| March-2012 | March-2013 | Urban | 7 | 30 | 1.056 | NM | 4.291 | NM | 0.837 | NM | 1.044 | NM | GC/FID | [ |
1 Not Mentioned.
Parameters included in the health risk assessment due to the exposure inhalation pathway.
| Parameter | Define | Unit | Value | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC | Chronic and sub-chronic exposure concentration | µg m−3 | ─ | [ |
| C | Concentration | mg m−3 | ─ | |
| THQ | Target Hazard Quotient | Unitless | ─ | [ |
| TTHQ | Total target Hazard Quotient | Unitless | ─ | |
| IURBap | Inhalation unit risk | ((mg m−3)−1) | Benzene: 7.8 × 106 | [ |
| ECR | Excessive cancer risk | Unitless | Benzene: 0.030 | [ |
| RfCi | Inhalation reference concentrations | mg m−3 | Toluene: 5.000 | [ |
| EF | Exposure frequency | day year−1 | 180 | [ |
| ED | Exposure duration | year | Adults: 24 | [ |
| ET | Exposure time | hour day−1 | 24 | [ |
| ATn | Averaging time | days | ATn = Non-carcinogens: ED × EF days | [ |
| IUR | Inhalation unit risk | (µg m−3)−1 | Benzene = 7.80 × 106 | [ |
| 1000 | Convert factor mg to µg | ─ | ─ |
Figure 1The selection process of articles and inclusion.
Figure 2Forest plot of concentration (ppb) of benzene (a), toluene (b), ethylbenzene (c), and o-xylene (d) in the ambient air of Tehran. ES: effect size, CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 3The percentage of BTEX in the ambient air of Tehran.
A comparison of the concentration of BTEX in ambient air of Tehran with other regions in the world (µg/m3).
| City/Country | Sample Size | Monitoring Periods | Benzene | Toluene | Ethylbenzene | O-Xylene | Method | Type of Source | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bari/Italy | NM 1 | April, September and October 2008 | 2.29 ± 1.59 | 4.76 ± 3.41 | 0.92 ± 0.66 | 1.3 ± 0.94 | GC/MS | Urban | [ |
| 18 areas/Canada | NM | September 2009 and December 2011 | 0.58 | 1.55 | 0.24 | 0.24 | GC/MS | Urban | [ |
| Aliaga/Western Turkey | 13 | 2005 and 2007 | 0.68 ± 0.68 | 1.6 ± 1.1 | 0.25 ± 0.17 | 0.16 ± 0.13 | GC/FID | Urban | [ |
| Kocaeli/Turkey | 49 | July 2006 | 2.26 ± 3.20 | 35.51 ± 39.55 | 9.72 ± 9.20 | 12.46 ± 12.46 | GC/FID | Urban | [ |
| Beijing/China | 41 | 26 February and 7 March 2013 | 1.73 ± 1.68 | 2.21 ± 2.10 | 0.38 ± 0.38 | 0.19 ± 0.17 | GC/FID | Urban | [ |
| Orleans/France | 56 | Winter 2011 | 0.95 | 0.27 | 0.95 | 0.14 | (TD–GC–MSD) | Semi-urban | [ |
| Navarra/Spain | 932 | June 2006 to June 2007 | 2.84 | 13.26 | 2.15 | 2.63 | GC/MS | Urban | [ |
| Sarnia/Canada | 37 | 2004–2005 | 0.93 | 2.54 | 0.46 | 0.49 | GC/MS | Urban | [ |
| Windsor/Canada | 42 | 2004–2005 | 0.76 | 2.88 | 0.44 | 0.45 | GC/MS | Urban | [ |
| Kuala Lumpur/Malaysia | 28 | December 2013 and January 2014 | 58.374 | 113.805 | 661.3 | NM | GC/MS | Urban | [ |
| Seoul/South Korea | 8003 | 2004 | 2.829 | 32.76 | 80.75 | NM | GC/FID | Urban | [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Not Mentioned.
Comparison of benzene/toluene (B/T) and ethylbenzene/o-xylene (E/o-X) concentration ratio in Tehran and other areas.
| Area Study | B/T | E/O-X | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangzhou/China | 0.35 | [ | |
| Hong Kong/China | 0.13 | [ | |
| Helsinki/Finland | 0.36 | [ | |
| Munich/Germany | 0.53 | [ | |
| Louis/India | 0.93 | [ | |
| Paris/France | 0.15 | [ | |
| London/English | 0.65 | [ | |
| Seoul/South Korea | 0.13 | [ | |
| Beijing/China | 0.71 | [ | |
| Beijing/China | 0.87 | [ | |
| Bari/Italy | 0.48 | 0.71 | [ |
| 18 areas/Canada | 0.37 | 1.00 | [ |
| Aliaga/Western Turkey | 0.43 | 1.56 | [ |
| Kocaeli/Turkey | 0.06 | 0.78 | [ |
| Beijing/China | 0.78 | 2.00 | [ |
| Orleans/France | 3.49 | 6.50 | [ |
| Navarra/Spain | 0.21 | 0.82 | [ |
| Sarnia/Canada | 0.37 | 0.94 | [ |
| Windsor/Canada | 0.26 | 0.98 | [ |
| Kuala Lumpur/Malaysia | 0.51 | [ | |
| Tehran/Iran | 1.69 | 0.86 | Present study |
Non-carcinogenic risk due to the inhalation of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and o-xylene.
| VOCs Compounds | C (Mean) | C (P95%) | EC (Mean) | EC (P95%) | RfCi | THQ (Mean) | THQ (P95%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| µg/m−3 | µg/m−3 | mg/m3 | |||||
| Benzene | 149.178 | 160.27 | 0.149 | 0.160 | 0.03 | 4.973 | 5.342 |
| Toluene | 87.970 | 107 | 0.088 | 0.107 | 5.00 | 0.018 | 0.021 |
| Ethylbenzene | 110.150 | 142 | 0.110 | 0.142 | 1.00 | 0.110 | 0.142 |
| O-Xylene | 127.160 | 152.2 | 0.127 | 0.152 | 0.10 | 1.272 | 1.522 |
Figure 4TTHQ of BTEX in ambient air due to inhalation exposed population.
Carcinogenic risk due to the inhalation of benzene and ethylbenzene.
| VOCs Compounds | EC (Mean) | EC (P95%) | IUR | ECR (Mean) | ECR (P95%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benzene | 0.149 | 0.160 | 7.80 × 106 | 1.16 × 106 | 1.25 × 106 |
| Ethylbenzene | 0.110 | 0.142 | 2.50 × 106 | 8.59 × 107 | 1.11 × 106 |