Literature DB >> 30149037

Reducing overuse of cervical cancer screening: A systematic review.

Julia M Alber1, Noel T Brewer2, Cathy Melvin3, Alyssa Yackle1, Jennifer S Smith2, Linda K Ko4, Anatasha Crawford5, Karen Glanz6.   

Abstract

Overuse of clinical preventive services increases healthcare costs and may deprive underserved patients of necessary care. Up to 45% of cervical cancer screening is overuse. We conducted a systematic review of correlates of overuse of cervical cancer screening and interventions to reduce overuse. The search identified 25 studies (20 observational; 5 intervention). Correlates varied by the type of overuse measured (i.e., too frequent, before/after recommended age to start or stop screening, after hysterectomy), the most common correlates of overuse related to patient age (n = 7), OBGYN practice or provider (n = 5), location (n = 4), and marital status (n = 4). Six observational studies reported a decrease in overuse over time. Screening overuse decreased in all intervention studies, which used before-after designs with no control or comparison groups. Observational studies suggest potential targets for de-escalating overuse. Randomized clinical trials are needed to establish best practices for reducing overuse.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appropriate use; Cancer screening; Overuse; Pap tests; Quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30149037     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  5 in total

1.  Characteristics Associated with Low-Value Cancer Screening Among Office-Based Physician Visits by Older Adults in the USA.

Authors:  Mary A Gerend; Russell Bradbury; Jeffrey S Harman; George Rust
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 6.473

2.  Trends and Determinants in Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening in Spain: An Analysis of National Surveys from 2017 and 2020.

Authors:  Silvia Portero de la Cruz; Jesús Cebrino
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  The Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN): Advancing public health and implementation science.

Authors:  Arica White; Susan A Sabatino; Cynthia Vinson; David Chambers; Mary C White
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Overuse of Cervical Cancer Screening Tests Among Women With Average Risk in the United States From 2013 to 2014.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Ling Chen; Ana I Tergas; Alexander Melamed; Caryn M St Clair; June Y Hou; Fady Khoury-Collado; Allison Gockley; Melissa Accordino; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-04-01

5.  A pilot study of acupuncture at pain acupoints for cervical cancer pain.

Authors:  Fan-Feng Meng; Yan-Hong Feng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.