Literature DB >> 34379279

Characteristics Associated with Low-Value Cancer Screening Among Office-Based Physician Visits by Older Adults in the USA.

Mary A Gerend1, Russell Bradbury2, Jeffrey S Harman2, George Rust2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After a certain age, cancer screening may expose older adults to unnecessary harms with limited benefits and represent inefficient use of health care resources.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the frequency of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening among adults older than US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) age thresholds at which screening is no longer considered routine and to identify physician and patient factors associated with low-value cancer screening.
DESIGN: Observational study using pooled cross-sectional data (2011-2016) from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a nationally representative probability sample of US office-based physician visits. PARTICIPANTS: Analyses for cervical and breast cancer screening were limited to visits by women over age 65 (N=37,818) and ages 75 and over (N=19,451), respectively. Analyses for colorectal cancer screening were limited to visits by patients over age 75 (N=31,543). MAIN MEASURES: Cancer screening procedures were coded as low value using USPSTF age thresholds. KEY
RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2016, an estimated 509, 507, and 273 thousand potentially low-value Pap smears, mammograms, and colonoscopies/sigmoidoscopies, respectively, were ordered annually. Low-valuecervical cancer screening was less likely to occur for visits with older (vs. younger) patients. Compared to visits by non-HispanicWhite women, low-valuecervical and breast cancer screening was less likely to occur for visits by women whose race/ethnicitywas something other than non-HispanicWhite, non-HispanicBlack, or Hispanic. Obstetrician/gynecologistswere more likely to order low-valuePap smears and mammograms compared to family/generalpractice physicians.
CONCLUSIONS: Thousands of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screenings at ages beyond routine guideline thresholds occur each year in the USA. Further research is needed to understand whether this pattern represents clinical inertia and resistance to de-adoption of previous screening practices, or whether physicians and/or patients perceive a higher value in these tests than that endorsed by experts writing evidence-based guidelines.
© 2021. Society of General Internal Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer screening; low-value care; older adults

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34379279      PMCID: PMC9360208          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07072-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   6.473


  34 in total

Review 1.  Overuse of health care services in the United States: an understudied problem.

Authors:  Deborah Korenstein; Raphael Falk; Elizabeth A Howell; Tara Bishop; Salomeh Keyhani
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-01-23

2.  U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations and cancer screening among female Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Ramzi G Salloum; Racquel E Kohler; Gail A Jensen; Stacey L Sheridan; William R Carpenter; Andrea K Biddle
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Targeting of mammography screening according to life expectancy in women aged 75 and older.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Erica S Breslau; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C Grossman; Susan J Curry; Karina W Davidson; John W Epling; Francisco A R García; Matthew W Gillman; Diane M Harper; Alex R Kemper; Alex H Krist; Ann E Kurth; C Seth Landefeld; Carol M Mangione; Douglas K Owens; William R Phillips; Maureen G Phipps; Michael P Pignone; Albert L Siu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Cancer screening rates in individuals with different life expectancies.

Authors:  Trevor J Royce; Laura H Hendrix; William A Stokes; Ian M Allen; Ronald C Chen
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Plans to stop cancer screening tests among adults who recently considered screening.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Mick P Couper; Carrie A Levin; Michael P Pignone; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Does patient health and hysterectomy status influence cervical cancer screening in older women?

Authors:  Helen I Meissner; Jasmin A Tiro; David Haggstrom; Grace Lu-Yao; Nancy Breen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: variation by physician and geographic region.

Authors:  Kristin M Sheffield; Yimei Han; Yong-Fang Kuo; Taylor S Riall; James S Goodwin
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Older adults and forgoing cancer screening: "I think it would be strange".

Authors:  Alexia M Torke; Peter H Schwartz; Laura R Holtz; Kianna Montz; Greg A Sachs
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Role of quality measurement in inappropriate use of screening for colorectal cancer: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sameer D Saini; Sandeep Vijan; Philip Schoenfeld; Adam A Powell; Stephanie Moser; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.