Darya Tsvirkun1, Yael Ben-Nun1, Emmanuelle Merquiol1, Ivan Zlotver1, Karen Meir2, Tommy Weiss-Sadan1, Ilan Matok1, Rachela Popovtzer3, Galia Blum1. 1. The Institute for Drug Research, The School of Pharmacy, The Faculty of Medicine, Campus Ein Karem , The Hebrew University , Jerusalem 9112001 , Israel. 2. Department of Pathology , Hadassah Medical Center , Jerusalem 9112001 , Israel. 3. Faculty of Engineering & The Institute of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials , Bar-Ilan University , Ramat Gan 52900 , Israel.
Abstract
X-ray CT instruments are among the most available, efficient, and cost-effective imaging modalities in hospitals. The field of CT molecular imaging is emerging which relies mainly on the detection of gold nanoparticles and iodine-containing compounds directed to tagging a variety of abundant biomolecules. Here for the first time we attempted to detect enzymatic activity, while the low sensitivity of CT scanners to contrast reagents made this a challenging task. Therefore, we developed a new class of nanosized cathepsin-targeted activity-based probes (ABPs) for functional CT imaging of cancer. ABPs are small molecules designed to covalently modify enzyme targets in an activity-dependent manner. Using a CT instrument, these novel probes enable detection of the elevated cathepsin activity within cancerous tissue, thus creating a direct link between biological processes and imaging signals. We present the generation and biochemical evaluation of a library of ABPs tagged with different sized gold nanoparticles (GNPs), with various ratios of cathepsin-targeting moiety and a combination of different polyethylene glycol (PEG) protective layers. The most potent and stable GNP-ABPs were applied for noninvasive cancer imaging in mice. Surprisingly, detection of CT contrast from the tumor had reverse correlation to GNP size and the amount of targeting moiety. Interestingly, TEM images of tumor sections show intercellular lysosomal subcellular localization of the GNP-ABPs. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the covalent linkage is key for detection using low sensitive imaging modalities and the utility of GNP-ABPs as a promising tool for enzymatic-based CT imaging.
X-ray CT instruments are among the most available, efficient, and cost-effective imaging modalities in hospitals. The field of CT molecular imaging is emerging which relies mainly on the detection of gold nanoparticles and iodine-containing compounds directed to tagging a variety of abundant biomolecules. Here for the first time we attempted to detect enzymatic activity, while the low sensitivity of CT scanners to contrast reagents made this a challenging task. Therefore, we developed a new class of nanosized cathepsin-targeted activity-based probes (ABPs) for functional CT imaging of cancer. ABPs are small molecules designed to covalently modify enzyme targets in an activity-dependent manner. Using a CT instrument, these novel probes enable detection of the elevated cathepsin activity within cancerous tissue, thus creating a direct link between biological processes and imaging signals. We present the generation and biochemical evaluation of a library of ABPs tagged with different sized gold nanoparticles (GNPs), with various ratios of cathepsin-targeting moiety and a combination of different polyethylene glycol (PEG) protective layers. The most potent and stable GNP-ABPs were applied for noninvasive cancer imaging in mice. Surprisingly, detection of CT contrast from the tumor had reverse correlation to GNP size and the amount of targeting moiety. Interestingly, TEM images of tumor sections show intercellular lysosomal subcellular localization of the GNP-ABPs. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the covalent linkage is key for detection using low sensitive imaging modalities and the utility of GNP-ABPs as a promising tool for enzymatic-based CT imaging.
One of the leading
causes of death in the Western world is still
cancer. Regardless of tremendous progress in the pharmaceutical and
nanomaterial chemistry, early and accurate detection of the disease
remains a major challenge.[1] The ability
to visualize, characterize, and quantify specific proteins and genes
and evaluate molecular pathways within the living organism will certainly
improve the diagnosis and prognosis of various conditions. Traditional
pathological evaluation is often done by microscopy, in which excised
tissues are typically examined to characterize histological changes
within the disease process. Molecular imaging, in contrast, targets
distinct molecular pathways in vivo, providing noninvasive visual
and quantitative information for diverse applications.[2]Computed tomography (CT) is an imaging method that
uses X-rays
to create cross-sectional images of the body. CT visualizes the internal
structures of the body providing three-dimensional (3D) anatomic details
and is routinely used for diagnosis of diseases, prediction of therapy,
and treatment assessment. Currently, it is one of the most commonly
used noninvasive clinical imaging modalities owing to its wide availability,
high efficiency, and cost effectiveness.[3,4] Although it
has high spatial resolution, the main drawback of this modality for
molecular imaging remains the low sensitivity and difficulty to distinguish
subtle changes in soft tissue, particularly tumors which have similar
X-ray absorption as their surroundings. We strongly believe that exogenous
CT detectable agents that enhance tumor contrast will lead to better
characterization and detection of cancer.[5]A wide variety of CT contrast agents have been developed in
the
past decade which focus mainly on iodine-containing probes and gold
nanoparticles (GNPs).[6] Although iodine-based
molecules are clinically used, they have some limitations, such as
fast renal clearance and renal toxicity, making them incompatible
for image-guided surgery (in humans) or preclinical studies by micro-CT.
Additionally, blood pool agents, such as iodine-based probes, exhibit
fast body dissipation, leading to uniform enhancement of the entire
body. In the case of CT imaging contrast enhancement, GNPs attenuate
X-rays more efficiently than iodine by many orders of magnitude. This
is due not only to the much stronger attenuation per atom (gold vs
iodine) but also to the large number of atoms per gold nanoparticle.
In addition, a previous study showed a very high LD50 for
gold nanoparticles of 3.2 g Au/kg,[7] which
is a great advantage for CT imaging where high dosages of a contrast
agent are required. Most of the nanoparticle-based contrast agents
accumulate in the tumor via passive targeting due to enhanced permeability
and retention (EPR) effect over the course of hours to days.[8] Nevertheless, no optimal particle size or surface
charge was identified for maximizing this effect due to the significant
variability between tumors. Nanoparticles in the range of 10 to 100
nm showed the highest passive tumor penetration in animal models with
minimal sublethal toxicity effect.[9,10] However, to
achieve functional imaging using CT instruments, active targeting
of nanoparticles is obligatory.[11] Targeting
probes to specific pathologies can significantly reduce the injection
dose and thus minimize side effects and toxicity. As recently revealed,
many techniques are used for GNP surface modification for multiple
tumor markers such as antibodies, peptides, or small molecules.[12] In general, the targeting efficacy of functionalized
nanoparticles depends on the nature of the ligand, the selected coupling
reaction, and the ligand surface density.In this study, we
evaluate three different sizes of GNPs stabilized
by polyethylene glycol (PEG) coating conjugated via an Au–S
bond, providing a stable CT tag. The tag was easily and reproducibly
conjugated to a targeting moiety, an active site inhibitor specifically
targeted to cathepsin proteases, thus generating an activity-based
probe (ABP). ABPs are tagged molecules that are designed to covalently
modify enzyme targets in an activity-dependent manner thus reporting
their activity. To this end, ABPs have been developed for a number
of enzyme families, including proteases, kinases, phosphatases, glycosidases
ect.[13] Proteases recognize their substrate
target by the amino acid sequence around their cleavage site; in most
cases the recognition is up to four amino acids on each side of the
scissile bond (the target site for cleavage). The covalent nature
of ABPs is generated by an electrophile termed “warhead”
which is placed close to the recognition element. Several cysteine
protease ABPs include an acyloxymethyl ketone (AOMK) chemical group
as their warhead, because it is highly selective for cysteine proteases.[14]Cysteine cathepsins are highly upregulated
in a wide range of cancer
processes by mechanisms ranging from gene amplification to post transcriptional
modification. Within the tumor microenvironment, a large variety of
cell types highly express cathepsins including fibroblasts, T cells,
endothelial cells, osteoclasts, neutrophils, and predominantly macrophages.[15] We have previously reported on cathepsin fluorescent
ABPs that allow for visualization of active cathepsins B, L, and S
in tumor-bearing mice.[16,17] These ABPs were based on the
covalent and specific cathepsin inhibitor GB111-NH2 as
their targeting moiety.[18] Cathepsins B,
L, and S are highly abundant within intracellular endolysosomal vesicles
and are constitutively expressed, while cathepsin B can reach a concentration
as high as 1 mM.[19] Cathepsin activity is
highly elevated in metastatic tumors, where they increase motility
and invasion of cancer cells and mediate degradation of the extracellular
matrix as well as angiogenesis.[20] Furthermore,
many studies link the high cathepsin activity with prognostic and
predictive factors in humancancers, prominently breast, colorectal,
pancreatic, ovarian, and lung cancers. Cathepsin expression is commonly
elevated in tumors compared to normal tissue; thus, recently cysteine
cathepsins were targeted for anticancer strategies within the tumor
microenvironment.[15] On the basis of this
evidence, we hypothesized that cathepsin activity will be sufficiently
elevated in tumors, allowing for its detection by GNP-labeled ABPs,
overcoming the low sensitivity of CT scanners.Here we explore
the newly generated cathepsin-targeted GNP-ABPs
for their potency, overall permeability, and imaging capabilities.
We based the GNP probes on our published potent and selective GB111-NH2 cathepsin inhibitor. Our novel probes are beneficial because
they retain the contrast element at the desired site, increasing the
imaging sensitivity. Moreover, reporting on the levels of activated
cathepsins may reveal critical information regarding disease progression,
enabling more accurate diagnoses and better targeted treatments using
highly abundant CT scanners.
Experimental Section
Synthesis
of GB111-NH2
The synthesis was
performed as previously reported[16] and
is described in detail in Figure S1.
Synthesis of Ac-DWK-amide
Ac-DWK-amide was prepared
on Rink resin (Advanced Chemtech) using the standard solid-phase peptide
synthesis method (detailed description in Figure S2).GNPs stabilized in citrate buffer were purchased
from Cytodiagnostic Inc., at three different sizes: 10, 30, 100 nm.
A protective layer of PEG was absorbed on the surface of the GNPs
at different molar ratios and different lengths consisting of a mixture
of thiol-polyethylene-glycol (mPEG-SH) and a heterofunctional thiol-
polyethylene-acid (SH-PEG-COOH) (Creative PEGWorks, Winston Salem,
NC). In a typical process, 11 μL of PEG mixture solution was
added to 1.0 mL of GNP solution (OD 1) at different concentrations
to obtain the following final molar concentrations of PEG: 0.01, 0.1,
1, 10 mM. The reaction mixture was vortexed immediately and then incubated
at room temperature for 2 h. After PEGylation, each solution was centrifuged
at 14000, 9400, 8600 rpm (10, 30, 100 nm, respectively) for 20 min
and redispersed with Milli-Q water by gentle shaking. This process
was repeated three times. From the resulting solution, a small part
was analyzed by measuring absorption spectra, hydrodynamic size, and
zeta potential. The mixture was stored at 4 °C. PEGylation at
0.01 mM final concentration was found to be most efficient and stable.
Conjugation of GB111-NH2 to PEGylated Gold Nanoparticles
PEG-GNPs were washed in 1 mL of DMF:DDW (1:10) several times. EDC
(1.3 μmol, 0.21 mg) and NHS (1.3 μmol, 0.13 mg, 10 equiv
relative to the PEG-COOH moiety) were dissolved together and added
to the PEG-GNP solution for 30 min at room temperature, providing
active sites on GNPs that underwent an amidation reaction with GB111-NH2. The amount of peptide added was 0.38 mg (75 nmol) per 2.5
mg of molecular gold (1:10 ratio to activated moiety). The mixture
was incubated overnight at room temperature followed by centrifugation
and DMF washes to remove unbound peptides in the solution.
Conjugation
of Ac-DWK-amide to PEGylated Gold Nanoparticles
The conjugation
was performed in a similar fashion to that of GB111-NH2 described above.
Chemical Evaluation
Dynamic light
scattering (DLS)
and ζ potential measurements were conducted in DDW using a Zetasizer
nano-ZSP (Malvern). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis
was performed using JEOL JEM-1400Plus by applying ∼10 μL
of samples resuspended in DDW to a 200- or 400-mesh copper grid covered
by carbon-stabilized Formvar film (SPI, West Chester, PA). The samples
were dried overnight before scans were performed at different kV levels.Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), to establish the mass ratio between
organic moiety (PEG) and gold atoms, was performed using a Mettler
Toledo instrument. Temperature program: heat from 30 °C to 450
°C at a rate of 10 °C/min in nitrogen atmosphere with a
purge rate of 20 mL/min.
Recombinant Cathepsin Labeling
Recombinant
human cathepsin
B, 0.7 μg in reaction buffer (50 mM acetate, 2 mM DTT, and 5
mM MgCl2 at pH 5.5), was treated at room temperature (RT)
with GNP-PEG-GB111 baring 0.1–20 μM inhibitor moiety
(GB111), or vehicle for 1 h. GB123 (1 μM),[17] a fluorescent labeled cathepsin ABP, was added to samples
for 30 min at RT. The reaction was stopped by addition of sample buffer
4× (40% glycerol, 0.2 M Tris/HCl 6.8, 20% β-mercaptoethanol,
12% SDS, and 0.4 mg/mL bromophenol blue), samples were then boiled,
separated on a 12.5% SDS gel, and scanned for fluorescence with a
Typhoon scanner FLA 9500, excitation/emission 635/670 nm.
Evaluation
of Probes Permeability to Intact Cells. Competition
Assay
NIH-3T3 cells (1 × 105 cells/well)
were seeded in a 12-well plate 1 day before treatment. Cells were
treated with vehicle or probe containing indicated concentrations
of GB111 moiety that were predissolved in 0.1% DMF, 0.9% DDW. After
4 or 24 h of probe incubation, residual cathepsin activity was labeled
with GB123 (1 μM). Cells were washed with PBS and lysed by addition
of sample buffer. Lysates were boiled for 10 min and centrifuged.
Protein content was determined and equal amounts were separated by
12.5% SDS gel. Residual labeled proteases in cells were visualized
by scanning the gel with a Typhoon scanner FLA 9500, excitation/emission
wavelengths of 635/670 nm.
Cell Viability Assay
NIH-3T3mouse
fibroblast cells
(5 × 103, 24 h; 3 × 103, 48 h) and
4T1murine mammary carcinoma cells (6 × 103, 24 h;
4 × 103, 48 h) were seeded in a 96-well plate and
incubated for 24 h for cell attachment. GNP-ABPs or control GNPs,
dispersed in fresh culture media, were added at equivalent concentrations
to each well (200 μL) and incubated for 24 or 48 h at 37 °C.
The medium was discarded to remove free particles in the solution,
and cell survival was determined by standard methylene blue assay.
Animal Care
All animals were maintained on a 12:12
h light/dark cycle under fixed conditions of temperature (23 °C)
and humidity (50%), with free access to food and water. All experimental
procedures were approved by the Animal Care Committee of Hebrew University
of Jerusalem and in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and
Use of Laboratory Animals.
In Vivo Imaging
4T1 cells were grown
to subconfluency,
followed by detachment with trypsin, spin down, and resuspension in
0.5% BSA in sterile PBS and 25% matrigel. Cells (1 × 106 per spot in a total volume of 20 μL) were injected subcutaneously
into the back of 3–4 week-old male BALB/c mice under isoflurane
anesthesia. Tumors were typically established 9–11 days after
cells injections, and compounds were injected intravenously via the
tail vein as follows: in a total volume of 200 μL from stock
solution of 25 mg/mL (5 mg of GNP per mouse). Mice anesthetized with
isoflurane were imaged prior to injection and at 24, 48, and 72 h
postinjection. The number of mice used is indicated in the figures.
A micro-CT scanner (Skyscan High Resolution Model 1176) equipped with
64 detectors with a nominal resolution of 35 μm was used (0.2
mm aluminum filter, a tube voltage of 40 kV and 500 mA). Reconstruction
was performed using SkyScanNRecon software. Ring artifact reduction,
Gaussian smoothing (3%), and beam hardening correction (25%) were
applied. Volume-rendered three-dimensional (3D) images were generated
using SkyScan CT-Volume (“CTVol”) software. To quantify
the exact amount of GNPs that reached the tumor tissue at each time
point, we analyzed the tissue absorbance and GNP absorbance for the
same ROI apart. The number of voxels for soft tissue absorbance was
characterized by low energies and hence was defined by us as 25–255
in gray scale, while gold (and bone) was 53–255 for higher
energies. The minimum threshold for gold detection was derived from
a prescan of the mouse, showing no contrast in voxels in the tumor
at that grayscale index. After the total voxel number was derived
from the image for each range, the labeling percentage of voxels per
tumor was calculated (% labeling = num. of vox (53–255)/num.
of vox (25–255)).In vivo imaging with inhibitor pretreatment:
tumor-bearing mice were injected intraperitoneally (IP) with 40 mg/kg
cathepsin inhibitor GB111-NH2 (10% DMSO, 15% Tween 80 and
75% PBS) 5 h before T-GNPs injection and an additional dose of 20
mg/kg 48 h postinjection of T-GNP. Mice in all other GNP treatment
groups (Targeted (T), Non-Targeted (NT) and Non-Specific (NS)) received
saline solution injections (IP) at the same time points (5 and 48
h).
Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
Flame atomic absorption
spectroscopy (FAAS, SpectrAA 140, Agilent Technologies) was used to
determine amounts of gold in the investigated organs. The tissues
obtained from the experimental animals were melted with aqua regia
(a mixture of nitric acid and hydrochloric acid in a volume ratio
of 1:3). The acidic liquids were then evaporated, DDW was added to
a final volume of 7 mL and then solution was filtered. An Au wavelength
lamp was used to determine the gold concentration in the samples in
comparison to a calibration curve with known gold concentrations (commonly:
1, 2, 5, and 10 mg/L). Each sample was analyzed in triplicate, averages
and standard deviations were calculated. The measured amount of gold
was divided by the organs’ weight.
Preparation of Tissues
for Transmission Electron Microscopy
Tissue was dissected
from animals into PBS (phosphate-buffered
saline, pH 7.4) and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde, 2.5% glutaraldeyde
in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for several hours at RT. The tissues
were then rinsed four times, 10 min each, in cacodylate buffer, postfixed
and stained with 1% osmium tetroxide, 1.5% potassium ferricyanide
in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer for 1 h. Tissues were then washed four
times in cacodylate buffer followed by dehydration in increasing concentrations
of ethanol consisting of 30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, for 10 min
each step followed by 100% anhydrous ethanol three times, 20 min each,
and propylene oxide twice, for 10 min each. Following dehydration,
the tissues were infiltrated with increasing concentrations of agar
100 resin in propylene oxide, consisting of 25, 50, 75, and 100% resin
for 16 h each step. The tissues were then embedded in fresh resin
and allowed to polymerize in an oven at 60 °C for 48 h. Embedded
tissues in blocks were sectioned with a diamond knife on an LKB 3
microtome, and ultrathin sections (80 nm) were collected onto 200
mesh, thin-bar copper grids. The sections on grids were sequentially
stained with uranyl acetatefor 5 min and lead citrate for 2 min and
viewed with a Tecnai 12 TEM at 100 kV (Phillips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands)
equipped with a MegaView II CCD camera and Analysis version 3.0 software
(SoftImaging System GmbH, Münstar, Germany).
Preparation
of Tumor Tissue for Pathological Evaluation
To evaluate the
tumor model, 65% of the resected tumors obtained
from an in vivo experiment were arbitrarily collected and fixed with
4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C, transferred to 10% formalin neutral
buffer solution, and embedded in paraffin. Sections (10 μM thick)
were obtained, stained by using hematoxylin and eosin, and examined
under a light microscope.
Statistics
Statistical analyses
for in vitro experiments were performed using Excel
Software, and error bars
represent standard deviation. A two-tailed t test
was performed to determine significance when comparing the means of
two groups. Alternatively, one-way ANOVA with Dunett’s correction
for multiple comparisons was performed using GraphPad Prism software
to compare the means of gold accumulation measured by FAAS as indicated
in the figure legend. Independent experiments were conducted with
a minimum of two biological replicates per condition to allow for
statistical comparison. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)
was performed in SPSS and applied to examine effects of T-GNP-ABP
uptake in vivo and tumor volume containing gold due to time (in four
levels), size (three levels), and targeting (targeted vs nontargeted).
In addition, in the cases of significant differences between more
than two categories, posthoc pairwise comparisons (with Bonferroni
correction) were conducted. The alpha level was set at p < 0.0083.
Results
Micro-CT Sensitivity Evaluation
To choose the optimal
contrasting agent as an ABP tag, we first evaluated the detection
level of the various elements using dual energy micro-CT. Scanning
each contrast agent separately demonstrated linearity of the contrast
with concentrations, thus enabling us to determine both the lowest
concentrations detected in DDW as well as the attenuation efficiency
(derived from the attenuation slope). While the minimal concentration
of iodine and gadolinium detected was lower, the GNPs showed X-ray
attenuation three times more efficiently, making gold an excellent
tag for our probes. This is due not only to the much stronger attenuation
per atom but also to the large number of atoms per GNP, Figure S3.
GNP-ABP Synthesis and Characterization
In our attempt
to generate efficient GNP-ABPs we first designed a library of cathepsin-targeted
nanoparticles with different particle sizes and coatings that were
evaluated for various characteristics such as potency, cell permeability,
and in vivo properties. We selected three different
sizes of GNPs to be linked to the targeting moiety: 10, 30, and 100
nm which eventually enabled us to validate the influence of particle
size on the uptake profile. As the targeting moiety of the ABP, we
selected GB111-NH2, a potent and selective cathepsin B,
L, and S inhibitor successfully used in our previous reports.[18] GB111-NH2 was synthesized using a
combination of solution and solid-phase chemistry as we previously
published,[16]Figure A. To generate the GNP-ABP first, a protective
layer of PEG with different lengths and different molar ratios of
capped mPEG-SH and a heterofunctional COOH-PEG-SH were absorbed on
the surface of the GNPs, Figure B. The monofunctional PEG (mPEG-), capped with a methoxy
group, was used for stability and biocompatibility of the particles[21] while the COOH-PEG moiety provided a chemical
handle for further binding of GB111-NH2. The most stable
coating was achieved with 0.01 mM final molar concentration of PEG
mixture. Overall, we generated a library of GNP-ABPs containing combinations
of different percentages of targeting moiety: 10%, 50%, and 100% on
the particle surface with different PEG lengths (Figure C, i–vi). A control
probe was synthesized for each size of GNP, lacking the targeting
moiety (Figure C,
vii). After synthesis, spectroscopy measurements were taken to characterize
the GNP-ABPs, including transmission electron microscopy (TEM), light
absorption, size, and zeta potential, with the TEM images revealing
that the gold core remained intact. The absorbance peak changed within
2–4 nm from the parent GNP core indicating aggregation did
not occur. The hydrodynamic diameter (HD) measured by dynamic light
scattering (DLS) revealed 10–30 nm increase in the HD after
PEGylation and targeting moiety coupling. In addition, each step of
the chemical modification and stability was confirmed by zeta potential
measurements showing a decrease in the negative charge. Correlation
between all methods provided reliable analysis of our probes, confirming
GNP-ABP formation and gold core stability, Figure D–F. We measured the stability of
a selected GNP-ABP, DTS-iv, and found it exhibited good stability
in 10% DMF:DDW over 10 weeks, Figure S4. Furthermore, particles could be easily resuspended without notable
aggregation, with no change in surface potential and size detected.
To proceed with biochemical evaluation of the GNP-ABPs, a quantitative
analysis to determine the amount of targeting moiety on each particle
was performed. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was used to establish
the mass ratio between organic moiety (PEG) and gold atoms. Because
PEG has a simple linear-chain-bond structure, thermal dissociation
occurs in a narrow temperature range, providing a reliable feature
to measure its quantity. We thus measured the weight differences between
GNP-PEGs before and after thermal dissociation. Calculations enabled
assessment of the average PEG density being 0.21 PEG/nm2 on the GNP which corresponds to the low PEG density particle group
(density lower than 1 PEG/nm2) having a “mushroom”
configuration. This result is consistent with the low concentration
of PEG mixture taken for the process.[22,23]
Figure 1
Chemical synthesis
and evaluation of gold nanoparticle activity-based
probes. (A) Synthesis of GB111-NH2 as published in ref (16). Lysine bromomethyl ketone
was reacted with dimethylbenzoic acid (DMBA) with KF, the Boc protecting
group was removed, and the compound was loaded on resin to give 2. The Fmoc protecting group was removed with DEA and phenylalanine
capped with Cbz was coupled, generating GB111-NH2 (3). (B) Three different sizes of GNPs were coupled to combinations
of different lengths of PEG protective layers, by PEG absorption on
the surface of the GNPs. Different percentages of PEG-COOH moiety
were used, providing reactive sites on GNPs that were bound to GB111-NH2 (3), to generate T-GNP-ABP. Nonfunctional PEG
capped with a methoxy group (OMe) was used for stability. (C) Schematic
diagram representing various derivatives of GNP-ABPs that were generated.
Characterization of selected GNP-ABPs: (D) TEM images of 10 nm, 30
nm, 100 nm GNP-ABPs. (E) Visible spectra absorbance of GNP-ABPs exhibit
a unique wavelength: before (bare GNP), red; after chemical modifications,
blue. (F) Size (DLS) and zeta-potential measurements of T-GNP-ABPs
represent the hydrodynamic diameter and surface charge. Correlation
was found between all methods.
Chemical synthesis
and evaluation of gold nanoparticle activity-based
probes. (A) Synthesis of GB111-NH2 as published in ref (16). Lysine bromomethyl ketone
was reacted with dimethylbenzoic acid (DMBA) with KF, the Boc protecting
group was removed, and the compound was loaded on resin to give 2. The Fmoc protecting group was removed with DEA and phenylalanine
capped with Cbz was coupled, generating GB111-NH2 (3). (B) Three different sizes of GNPs were coupled to combinations
of different lengths of PEG protective layers, by PEG absorption on
the surface of the GNPs. Different percentages of PEG-COOH moiety
were used, providing reactive sites on GNPs that were bound to GB111-NH2 (3), to generate T-GNP-ABP. Nonfunctional PEG
capped with a methoxy group (OMe) was used for stability. (C) Schematic
diagram representing various derivatives of GNP-ABPs that were generated.
Characterization of selected GNP-ABPs: (D) TEM images of 10 nm, 30
nm, 100 nm GNP-ABPs. (E) Visible spectra absorbance of GNP-ABPs exhibit
a unique wavelength: before (bare GNP), red; after chemical modifications,
blue. (F) Size (DLS) and zeta-potential measurements of T-GNP-ABPs
represent the hydrodynamic diameter and surface charge. Correlation
was found between all methods.
Biochemical Evaluation of GNP-ABPs
To determine the
potency of various derivatives, we performed competitive inhibition
of recombinant human cathepsins B. Indicated concentrations of the
various 30 nm GNP-ABPs were added to cathepsin B followed by labeling
of the residual activity with GB123, a Cy5 fluorescent cathepsin ABP.[17] The detection of the residual cathepsin B activity
was visualized by fluorescent scanning of the samples run on SDS PAGE,
demonstrating reactivity of the 10% and 100% targeting probes (DTS-i,
-iii, -iv) each to different extents, Figure A. Surprisingly, derivatives containing 50%
of targeting moiety on the surface (DTS-ii, -v) showed no potency
at all. We then focused on derivative DTS-iv and investigated the
inhibition of recombinant cathepsin B using different sized GNPs;
we found an interesting correlation of potency with size, the potency
being reduced with an increase in GNP particle size, Figure B. Evaluation of the probes’
cell permeability and capability of labeling cellular cathepsin enzymes
were performed using competitive inhibition assay by incubating selected
compounds with NIH-3T3 or 4T1 cells for 4 and 24 h. Next, residual
cathepsin activity was labeled by GB123. To ensure that the binding
is dependent on protease activity, a nontargeted control (NT-GNP)
was applied as well (DTS-vii). Cell lysates were separated by SDS
PAGE and scanned for fluorescence, Figure C. Results for NIH-3T3 cells after 24 h incubation
and 4T1 cells after 4 and 24 h incubation are presented in Figure S5. Encouragingly, all 10 nm T-GNP-ABPs
derivatives (carrying targeting moiety) tested showed high cell permeability
and inhibition of cathepsin activity; DTS-iii however was less potent
than DTS-iv. Within the 30 nm probes, DTS-i and DTS-iv (consisting
of 10% GB111) showed a clear preference for shorter PEG (3 kDa) as
a targeting moiety linker. Both 10 and 30 nm T-GNP-ABP were more potent
than the 100 nm probes. Similar data were observed for 24 h probe
incubation, Figure S5. Dose–response
inhibition of cathepsin activity was detected with targeted GNPs,
revealing a size-dependent pattern. Again, derivative DTS-iv exhibited
the highest potency and therefore was selected to continue to in vivo evaluation. Importantly, because no inhibition was
detected by the control DTS-vii, we concluded that the binding of
the probes occurred in an activity-dependent manner. Prior to examining
the GNP-ABPs in non-invasive imaging experiments, their cytotoxicity
was evaluated on NIH-3T3 and 4T1 cells, selected as models for normal
and cancer cells, respectively. We defined the targeted derivative
DTS-iv, T-GNP-ABP, and the non-targeted control DTS-vii, NT-GNP. Viability
was determined by methylene blue assay after treating the cells with
increasing concentrations of T-GNP-ABP or NT-GNP for 24 and 48 h.
Only minor cytotoxicity was detected with 10 nm T-GNP-ABP at the highest
concentration tested for 48 h while, surprisingly, notable cytotoxicity
was detected with 10 nm NT-GNP at 0.3 mg/mL at both 24 and 48 h, Figure D. We thus concluded
that working concentrations of ∼0.15 mg/mL Au should be safe
for animal use.
Figure 2
Biochemical evaluations of GNP-ABPs. (A) Competitive inhibition
of recombinant cathepsin B by the 30 nm GNP-ABP derivatives (Figure ). Indicated probe
concentrations were incubated with recombinant cathepsin B for 1 h
followed by 30 min labeling of the residual activity with GB123, a
fluorescent ABP.[17] Samples were separated
on SDS gel and scanned for fluorescence at ex/em 635/670 nm. (B) Competitive
inhibition of recombinant cathepsin B by DTS-iv derivatives of different
particle sizes, size dependent inhibition was observed. (C) Inhibition
of endogenous cathepsin activity in intact NIH-3T3 cells treated with
probes in growth media for 4 h followed by labeling of residual enzyme
activity by GB123. Control DTS-vii (NT-GNP) was applied. Whole cells
lysates were separated on SDS gel and scanned for fluorescence. Highly
potent inhibition of cathepsin activity was detected with DTS-i and
DTS-iv probes. A size-dependent pattern was observed: the smallest
compounds showed the highest potency. (D) NIH-3T3 and 4T1 cell viability
was determined by methylene blue assay after incubation with various
concentrations of DTS-iv (T) or DTS-vii (NT) for 24 or 48 h. Only
minor cytotoxicity was observed with 10 nm T-GNP at the highest concentration
tested. T, targeted; NT, non-targeted. Data are presented as mean
± SD (n = 6).
Biochemical evaluations of GNP-ABPs. (A) Competitive inhibition
of recombinant cathepsin B by the 30 nm GNP-ABP derivatives (Figure ). Indicated probe
concentrations were incubated with recombinant cathepsin B for 1 h
followed by 30 min labeling of the residual activity with GB123, a
fluorescent ABP.[17] Samples were separated
on SDS gel and scanned for fluorescence at ex/em 635/670 nm. (B) Competitive
inhibition of recombinant cathepsin B by DTS-iv derivatives of different
particle sizes, size dependent inhibition was observed. (C) Inhibition
of endogenous cathepsin activity in intact NIH-3T3 cells treated with
probes in growth media for 4 h followed by labeling of residual enzyme
activity by GB123. Control DTS-vii (NT-GNP) was applied. Whole cells
lysates were separated on SDS gel and scanned for fluorescence. Highly
potent inhibition of cathepsin activity was detected with DTS-i and
DTS-iv probes. A size-dependent pattern was observed: the smallest
compounds showed the highest potency. (D) NIH-3T3 and 4T1 cell viability
was determined by methylene blue assay after incubation with various
concentrations of DTS-iv (T) or DTS-vii (NT) for 24 or 48 h. Only
minor cytotoxicity was observed with 10 nm T-GNP at the highest concentration
tested. T, targeted; NT, non-targeted. Data are presented as mean
± SD (n = 6).
Non-invasive Imaging of Cancer in a Tumor Mouse Module
We
continue with in vivo experiments to evaluate
the efficacy of the ABP targeting methodology compared to passive
accumulation of GNP alone. For this reason, we took a syngeneic mouse
model in which 4T1 cells were injected subcutaneously to the back
of male BALB/c mice. After tumors were established, each mouse received
an intravenous (iv) injection (to the tail) of 5 mg of T-GNP-ABP (DTS-iv)
or NT-GNP (DTS-vii) compounds of various sizes. Mice were scanned
at 24, 48, and 72 h post-injection by a micro-CT scanner.To
overcome the diversity in tumor size over the experiment duration,
we first measured the voxels specific to gold attenuation within the
tumor (out of the full attenuation range) and then measured the total
range of attenuations of the tissue (including gold) for the same
ROI. We divided the gold voxels by the total voxels giving the percentage
of gold-containing voxels within each tumor; see Experimental Section for details. Similar to the in
vitro data, a marked size-dependent accumulation of both
targeted and nontargeted GNPs was observed at 72 h post-injection
as presented in volume-rendered 3D images. In general, accumulation
of NT-GNPs in tumor tissues is thought to occur because of the EPR
effect, slightly enhancing the CT signal.[24] Nevertheless, a pronounced enhancement of the CT signal was observed
in tumors from T-GNP-ABP injected mice (10 and 30 nm) as compared
to NT-GNP controls, Figure A. The 2D axial cross-section images revealed a similar pattern
with a uniform accumulation of T-GNP-ABPs in the peripheral region
of the tumor, presumably due to high interstitial pressure of the
solid tumors,[25] or higher cathepsin activity
in that tumor region,[20]Figure B. Furthermore, a distinct
signal was already detected 24 h post-injection and became highly
elevated at 72 h post-probe injection, excluding all 100 nm GNPs.
The 100 nm GNPs exhibited poor active and passive accumulation in
the tumor through all time points, Figure C. While pronounced signals were detected
in the tumors of mice injected with 10 and 30 nm GNP-ABPs, we also
observed signals from the digestive system at all time points. This
signal most likely results from the high mineral content of the chow
as it was detected in the prescan images, Figure D. Overall, a clear size-dependent accumulation
was seen with the highest signal enhancement detected with 10 nm T-GNP-ABP
and lowest tumor uptake with 100 nm.
Figure 3
Non-invasive micro-CT imaging of tumor
bearing mice. (A) CT scans
of mice 72 h postinjection of 10, 30, and 100 nm T or NT GNPs (5 mg
of gold per mouse). Representative CT images of volume-rendered 3D
images represent X-ray absorption of bones and gold, circles indicate
tumor location. (B) 2D axial cross-section images of the same mice
as in A. Accumulation of T-GNP-ABPs at the tumor led to significant
signal enhancement (shown in red circles). The highest enhancement
was obtained with 10 nm T-GNP-ABPs. (C) Time course of all T-GNP-ABP
and NT-GNP compounds. Images were acquired prior to probe injection
(0 h) and 24, 48, and 72 h postprobe injection. (D) Prescan image
indicates that contrast from the digestive system is attributed to
the high mineral content of the chow.
Non-invasive micro-CT imaging of tumor
bearing mice. (A) CT scans
of mice 72 h postinjection of 10, 30, and 100 nm T or NT GNPs (5 mg
of gold per mouse). Representative CT images of volume-rendered 3D
images represent X-ray absorption of bones and gold, circles indicate
tumor location. (B) 2D axial cross-section images of the same mice
as in A. Accumulation of T-GNP-ABPs at the tumor led to significant
signal enhancement (shown in red circles). The highest enhancement
was obtained with 10 nm T-GNP-ABPs. (C) Time course of all T-GNP-ABP
and NT-GNP compounds. Images were acquired prior to probe injection
(0 h) and 24, 48, and 72 h postprobe injection. (D) Prescan image
indicates that contrast from the digestive system is attributed to
the high mineral content of the chow.
Biodistribution of GNP-ABPs
GNP biodistribution was
monitored to follow pharmacokinetics throughout the body and its accumulation
in the tumors. After the last time point, the mice were sacrificed
and then tumors and other selected organs were analyzed by flame atomic
absorption spectroscopy (FAAS), determining the gold content in each
tissue, Figure A.
The T-GNP-ABPs and the control NT-GNPs showed uptake in the spleen,
kidney, and liver, indicating both passive and active uptake. As previously
published, contrast agents larger than 6 nm avoid renal clearance
and hence are excreted from the blood pool by phagocytic cells in
the reticuloendothelial system, occurring primarily in the liver and
spleen and thus leading to accumulation of contrast agents in those
organs.[11] Based on FAAS analysis, GNP-ABP
excretion was detected over a 96 h period. The GNP-ABPs all showed
fecal excretion, with the 10 nm showing the highest clearance with
a total 3.3% injected dose (ID), 30 nm 2.3% ID, and 100 nm only 1.5%
ID, Figure S6. Despite the targeting of
our GNPs, the maximal tumor uptake was lower than in the liver or
the spleen. Tumor uptake was prevalently stronger for T-GNP-ABPs than
the NT-GNPs; this finding was consistent both in the FAAS analysis
and average tumor uptake extracted from CT images, Figure A. A strong size-dependent
uptake in favor of small GNPs was found in tumor tissue both in the
T-GNP-ABPs and NT-GNPs. In repeated measures ANOVA, comparing the
changes in CT attenuation derived by time after administration, particle
size and targeting, a clear significant statistical difference between
the targeted group and the non-targeted group in all sizes together
was found (Wilk’s lambda P value = 0.034).
However, when analyzing the 100 nm particles alone, there was no statistical
difference; therefore, we conclude that this effect is driven by the
10 and 30 nm size particles and not from the 100 nm particles. In
a repeated measures ANOVA, a statistical significant difference was
also found between the following parameters: time and size, Wilk’s
lambda P value = 0.001; time and targeting, Wilk’s
lambda P value = 0.034, and a trend when comparing
time, size, and targeting, Wilk’s lambda P value = 0.08. Furthermore, over 6% of the total tumor volume contained
detectable gold content both at 48 and 72 h postinjection of either
10 or 30 nm T-GNP-ABP while the maximal detectable gold content impressively
reached over 10% at 72 h post 10 nm T-GNP-ABPs injection, Figure B.
Figure 4
T-GNP-ABPs uptake in vivo is size dependent. Quantification
of gold attenuation in CT scans vs gold concentration in main organs.
(A) Top: Percentage of tumor voxels containing gold out of the total
voxel in the tumors extracted from CT images of indicated times after
iv injection of T-GNP-ABP or NT-GNP. Repeated measures ANOVA showed
a significant (Wilk’s lambda P value = 0.034)
difference between targeted and non-targeted groups across all measured
sizes. Bottom: Average distribution of gold in the main organs 72
h post-injection of T-GNP-ABP or NT-GNP detected by FAAS. T-Test analysis
revealed that both 10 and 30 nm T-GNP show higher accumulation in
tumors compared to NT-GNP; P values are indicated.
(B) Top: Comparison of different sized T-GNP-ABP. The percentage of
tumor volume containing gold was analyzed from CT scans post-injection
as in A; the highest signal was detected with the 10 nm T-GNP-ABP.
The gold signal in the tumor increased over time and became highly
elevated at 72 h post-injection. Repeated measures ANOVA showed a
significant difference between time and size (Wilk’s lambda P value = 0.001). Bottom: Gold accumulation in major organs
detected by FAAS as in A. Similar size-dependent accumulation was
observed both by CT and FAAS. One-way ANOVA showed a statistical significant
difference as indicated. The number in brackets represent the number
of mice used. Bars represent standard error.
T-GNP-ABPs uptake in vivo is size dependent. Quantification
of gold attenuation in CT scans vs gold concentration in main organs.
(A) Top: Percentage of tumor voxels containing gold out of the total
voxel in the tumors extracted from CT images of indicated times after
iv injection of T-GNP-ABP or NT-GNP. Repeated measures ANOVA showed
a significant (Wilk’s lambda P value = 0.034)
difference between targeted and non-targeted groups across all measured
sizes. Bottom: Average distribution of gold in the main organs 72
h post-injection of T-GNP-ABP or NT-GNP detected by FAAS. T-Test analysis
revealed that both 10 and 30 nm T-GNP show higher accumulation in
tumors compared to NT-GNP; P values are indicated.
(B) Top: Comparison of different sized T-GNP-ABP. The percentage of
tumor volume containing gold was analyzed from CT scans post-injection
as in A; the highest signal was detected with the 10 nm T-GNP-ABP.
The gold signal in the tumor increased over time and became highly
elevated at 72 h post-injection. Repeated measures ANOVA showed a
significant difference between time and size (Wilk’s lambda P value = 0.001). Bottom: Gold accumulation in major organs
detected by FAAS as in A. Similar size-dependent accumulation was
observed both by CT and FAAS. One-way ANOVA showed a statistical significant
difference as indicated. The number in brackets represent the number
of mice used. Bars represent standard error.Since we detected high gold content in the tumors we attempted
to visualize the cellular localization of GNP within the cells. Tumors
were resected 72 h post iv injection of each gold-containing compound
and then subjected to TEM analysis. GNPs were clearly visualized in
the lysosomes of tumor cells from 10 and 30 nm T-GNP-ABP injected
mice, which is supported by the known cathepsin lysosomal cellular
location.[26,27] Small amounts of 10 and 30 nm NT-GNPs were
also observed in the cells, most likely due to passive uptake. The
100 nm compounds, however, showed low tumor cell presence with no
difference observed between passive and active uptake, possibly due
to low permeability and extensive spleen accumulation leading to short
blood circulation, hence a low availability of GNPs, Figure . The TEM results further support
the CT attenuation increase derived from T-GNP-ABPs that were detected
by the CT scans localized within the tumor cells.
Figure 5
TEM imaging of tumor
tissue. TEM images of a section of tumor tissue
taken from a tumor-bearing mouse 72 h post iv injection of 10 or 30
or 100 nm T-GNP-ABP or NT controls. Gold particles are marked with
red arrows (T) and blue arrows (NT). Tumor uptake of T-GNP-ABP was
clearly visualized for 10, 30, and 100 nm. Lower amounts of NT-GNPs
were observed in 10 and 30 nm; for the 100 nm, very few GNPs were
detected with minor differences between T and NT compounds. Images
depict localization of 10 and 30 nm T-GNP-ABP within the endosome/lysosome
of tumor cells. Scale bars are marked.
TEM imaging of tumor
tissue. TEM images of a section of tumor tissue
taken from a tumor-bearing mouse 72 h post iv injection of 10 or 30
or 100 nm T-GNP-ABP or NT controls. Gold particles are marked with
red arrows (T) and blue arrows (NT). Tumor uptake of T-GNP-ABP was
clearly visualized for 10, 30, and 100 nm. Lower amounts of NT-GNPs
were observed in 10 and 30 nm; for the 100 nm, very few GNPs were
detected with minor differences between T and NT compounds. Images
depict localization of 10 and 30 nm T-GNP-ABP within the endosome/lysosome
of tumor cells. Scale bars are marked.
Evaluation of T-GNP-ABP Uptake Efficiency
To further
confirm that the signal detected and measured in the tumors was due
to targeting moiety contribution and its covalent ability to target
protease activity, we designed an additional control probe (in addition
to the NT-GNP; DTS-vii). A non-specific GNP (NS-GNP; DTS-viii) bearing
a short peptide, Ac-DWK-amide (that lacks the ability to target cathepsin
B, L, or S), was conjugated to 3 kDa PEG of a 30 nm GNP via an amide
bond. This control was generated to mimic the surface potential of
our leading compound T-GNP (DTS-iv); see schematic presentation in Figure A.
Figure 6
Covalent targeting increases
tumor uptake. (A) Schematic diagram
representing GNP-ABPs DTS-iv (T-GNP-ABP) and control NT-GNP DTS-vii
as in Figure C along
with DTS-viii, a non-specific (NS-GNP) control bearing off-target
short peptide Ac-DWK-amide. (B) Cathepsin activity within intact 4T1
cells was examined after GNP treatment in growth media for 24 h, followed
by labeling of residual enzyme activity by GB123. In addition to T-GNP,
NT-GNP, and NS-GNP, cells treated with the cathepsin inhibitor GB111-NH2 (1 μM) 2 h prior to T-GNP-ABP addition (T+GB111) were
examined. Whole cells lysates were separated on SDS gel and scanned
for fluorescence as in Figure . Highly potent inhibition of cathepsin activity was detected
after treatment with T-GNP-ABP and T+GB111 whereas NT and NS showed
no cathepsin B or L inhibition. (C) Representative micro-CT scans
(volume-rendered 3D images) of tumor-bearing mice 72 h postinjection
of indicated GNPs (30 nm) is shown, circles indicate tumor location).
Accumulation of T-GNP-ABPs at the tumor led to significant signal
enhancement (shown in red circles) in all time points, indicating
the efficacy of covalent targeting of our probe. (D) Percentage of
tumor voxels containing gold out of the total voxel in the tumors
extracted from CT images of indicated times after iv injections of
indicated GNPs. Statistical analyses were performed by repeated measures
ANOVA of the targeting group relative to all negative controls combined
(NS, NT, and T + inhibitor), followed by Bonferroni posthoc tests.
A significant difference was found with a Wilk’s lambda P value <0.001. A graph depicting the statistical differences
between the marginal means relative to the time is shown in Figure S8. (E) Average accumulation of gold in
tumors 72 h postinjection of indicated GNPs detected by FAAS, one-way
ANOVA P* < 0.05. The number in brackets represent
the number of mice used. Data are represented as mean ± SE.
Covalent targeting increases
tumor uptake. (A) Schematic diagram
representing GNP-ABPs DTS-iv (T-GNP-ABP) and control NT-GNP DTS-vii
as in Figure C along
with DTS-viii, a non-specific (NS-GNP) control bearing off-target
short peptide Ac-DWK-amide. (B) Cathepsin activity within intact 4T1
cells was examined after GNP treatment in growth media for 24 h, followed
by labeling of residual enzyme activity by GB123. In addition to T-GNP,
NT-GNP, and NS-GNP, cells treated with the cathepsin inhibitor GB111-NH2 (1 μM) 2 h prior to T-GNP-ABP addition (T+GB111) were
examined. Whole cells lysates were separated on SDS gel and scanned
for fluorescence as in Figure . Highly potent inhibition of cathepsin activity was detected
after treatment with T-GNP-ABP and T+GB111 whereas NT and NS showed
no cathepsin B or L inhibition. (C) Representative micro-CT scans
(volume-rendered 3D images) of tumor-bearing mice 72 h postinjection
of indicated GNPs (30 nm) is shown, circles indicate tumor location).
Accumulation of T-GNP-ABPs at the tumor led to significant signal
enhancement (shown in red circles) in all time points, indicating
the efficacy of covalent targeting of our probe. (D) Percentage of
tumor voxels containing gold out of the total voxel in the tumors
extracted from CT images of indicated times after iv injections of
indicated GNPs. Statistical analyses were performed by repeated measures
ANOVA of the targeting group relative to all negative controls combined
(NS, NT, and T + inhibitor), followed by Bonferroni posthoc tests.
A significant difference was found with a Wilk’s lambda P value <0.001. A graph depicting the statistical differences
between the marginal means relative to the time is shown in Figure S8. (E) Average accumulation of gold in
tumors 72 h postinjection of indicated GNPs detected by FAAS, one-way
ANOVA P* < 0.05. The number in brackets represent
the number of mice used. Data are represented as mean ± SE.Moreover, we applied an additional
control group that included
pretreating mice with the inhibitor, GB111-NH2, to block
the cathepsin activity prior to T-GNP-ABP (30 nm) administration (T-GNP+GB111).
To confirm our approach, we first evaluated endogenous cathepsin inhibition
by the T-GNP compared to the new controls in 4T1 cells by competitive
inhibition with fluorescent GB123, Figure B. Encouragingly, 30 nm NT-GNPs and NS-GNP
derivatives showed no inhibition of cathepsin B as well as the Ac-DWK-amide
peptide alone. The T-GNPs and the pretreated (T+GB111) group showed
similar inhibition efficiency as expected. Importantly, non-invasive
CT imaging was studied in 4T1tumor-bearing mice to evaluate the efficacy
of the ABPs’ covalent targeting methodology compared to all
three control groups (NT, NS, and T+GB111) in a fashion similar to
that in Figure . The
inhibitor pretreated group received the GB111-NH2 inhibitor
by intraperitoneal injections 5 h before T-GNPs and an additional
dose 48 h post-injection of T-GNP. This inhibitor treatment regimen
was chosen because of the expected difference in pharmacokinetics,
between the small molecule inhibitor (GB111-NH2) and the
nanosize probe. Mice were scanned at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h post T-GNP
injection by a Micro-CT scanner. In correlation with our in vitro
experiment, a significant CT signal was detected in the tumor of mice
injected with T-GNP-ABPs while all three control groups showed lower
X-ray absorption, Figure C. We excluded that the differences in gold uptake was a result
of tumor heterogeneity by pathological evaluation of the extracted
tumors. All tumors demonstrated similar histological features without
necrotic tissue except for one tumor (from the non-targeted group), Figure S7. Quantification of the gold attenuation
in the CT scans as well as the FAAS analysis confirmed significant
reduction in signal in the mice treated with the control systems, Figure D,E. These results
ensure that the signal in T-GNP-injected mice was a result of the
covalent modification of cathepsin activity. Overall, our data supports
our hypothesis that cathepsin activity sufficiently elevated in tumors
allows for its detection by T-GNP-ABPs.
Discussion
The
cysteine cathepsins are a family of proteases that, besides
their main function of degrading proteases, play a critical role in
several types of cancer such as melanoma, colorectal, glioma, breast,
and lung.[28] Some members of the cathepsin
family have redundant functions and some members, such as cathepsin
B and L, have unique functions that play different roles in tumorigenic
processes such as angiogenesis, metastasis, and invasion. The involvement
of active proteases in various diseases led to the development of
several protease-targeting clinical drugs, laying the basis for proteases
as valid targets in pathological conditions. Here we exploited the
highly overexpressed cysteine cathepsins to develop activity-dependent
probes for molecular imaging of cancer. We described the development
of a series of cysteine cathepsin-targeted ABPs linked to different
sized GNPs coated with various combinations of PEG protecting layers.
We showed the covalent binding of the T-GNP-ABPs to recombinant cathepsin
and their ability to label and inhibit endogenous cathepsins within
intact cells. After validating that T-GNP-ABPs have minimal cytotoxicity,
we showed a size-dependent uptake in subcutaneous tumors where the
smallest particles showed significantly high accumulation, up to 12%,
of the tumor volume (Figure ), thus enabling micro-CT detection and overcoming its low
sensitivity. The pronounced tumor accumulation was corroborated by
FAAS studies and TEM images that clearly showed lysosomal localization
within the cells. The significantly high amounts of T-GNP-ABP found
in cancerous tissue are a combination of both the EPR effect and the
covalent nature of the probes bound to the locally, highly expressed
cathepsins. Covalent suicide inhibitors, however, often raise a potential
problem, lacking signal amplification because the target protease
is inhibited upon binding. Nevertheless, the T-GNP-ABPs elegantly
showed the potential use of the ABP methodology for functional CT
imaging of cancer. Furthermore, by remaining bound to the target enzyme,
a direct link between imaging signals and the biological process is
made. One might suggest that smaller particles cannot produce efficient
contrast enhancement due to lower amounts of gold atoms per voxel;
however, our data suggest a higher accumulation of the smaller particles
thus generating significant CT signals. This might be explained by
the fact that smaller particles are engulfed more intensively to the
lysosome compartment, leading to higher local concentrations of our
probe and hence higher contrast.[29,30] Active targeting
of GNPs has grown extensively in the past few years, due to the ease
of surface activation, with many pathological conditions being examined
and evaluated by non-invasive CT imaging including multiple tumor
receptors, lymph nodes, inflammation, and atherosclerosis.[12] Furthermore, inherent targeting of high-density
lipoprotein particles[31] and cell labeling
by GNPs were also successfully accomplished.[32] However, to the best of our knowledge there have been no reports
on enzyme activity monitoring by the CT technique, most likely due
to low sensitivity concerns. The goals of this work were to evaluate
whether enzymatic activity can be detected by micro-CT, to assess
the additional effect of protease targeting strategy compared to passive
accumulation, and to select the optimal GNP size for visualization
in vivo. We showed that cathepsin activity is sufficiently elevated
in cancer to allow for its detection by T-GNP-ABPs, generating additional
contrast above the signal generated by passive uptake of similar sized
GNPs. To generate functional compounds, various protective layers
were used in our chemical scaffolds designed from two lengths of PEG,
3 and 5 kDa, in various ratios of reactive vs capped PEG. The derivatives
were studied in terms of their potency toward recombinant and endogenous
cathepsins, and our results show that probes with 10% targeting moiety
(GB111) linked to the shorter PEG (DTS-iv) possess high potency in
all GNP sizes. The suggestive “mushroom” configuration
may explain this enhanced potency of DTS-iv when GB111 is linked to
the shorter PEG, enabling its exposure, rather than to the longer
PEG that may be folded. As suspected, the similarity in size between
GB111 and its PEG linker is advantageous.[33] The biodistribution studies of targeted GNP-ABPs reveal a size-dependent
tumor uptake. Apart from the tumor, the spleen, liver, and kidneys
exhibited considerable amounts of GNP-ABPs yet with different biodistributions
for each GNP size. Additionally, to take into account tumor variability
and potential clinical applications, evaluation of the 10 and 30 nm
T-GNP-ABPs should be considered in other tumor models. As previously
suggested by S. Hirn et al., negatively charged monosulfonated triphenylphosphine
GNPs (TPPMS-GNPs) exhibited a hepatobiliary fecal clearance pathway
from rat liver into the small intestine, showing an inverse linear
relationship to their diameter.[9] The excretion
kinetics assessment of our probes follows a similar tendency. Furthermore,
the excretion of GNP-ABPs was slow but steady, thus partially reducing
the concern of long-term toxicity in the liver. Nevertheless, the
10 nm GNP-ABPs showed the highest liver uptake, as well as some toxicity
in intact cells (Figure D), raising the necessity to better understand long-term effects.
Conclusion
We found our covalent GNP-ABPs as promising new tools for functional
imaging of specific protease activity in vivo using
the CT instrument. The covalent linkage is key for detection using
the low sensitive imaging modalities. CT provides 3D anatomic details
of the body; thus, it is widely used in clinical and preclinical practice
for diagnosis of disease, prediction of therapy, and treatment assessment.
We screened and evaluated several types of GNP tags for most efficient
and selective targeting of cysteine cathepsins. Tumor accumulation
of the targeted GNP-ABPs is determined by the delicate balance between
the targeting moieties’ features and particle size. We show
that the chemical structure of the particle strongly influences their
biological behavior. We found our lead compounds DTS-iv 10 and 30
nm to be highly effective for tumor imaging, its small size enabling
excretion mainly through the hepatobiliary system, which appears to
be a sufficient way to remove metal nanoparticles from the body. Still,
the main limitation of our technology is the enhanced absorption in
organs such as the liver, kidney, and spleen where there is high cathepsin
activity, making imaging of tumors in these organs challenging at
this point. However, further developments in CT technology could improve
the sensitivity and specificity limitations, expanding the potential
utility of our reagents. Additionally, Bindin et al. analyzed different
stages of breast, lung, and cervical tumors using multiplex zymography
of elevated activities of cathepsins K, L, and S.[34] Thus, real-time measurements of tumor growth, metastasis
formation, and cancer staging could potentially be performed in large
living organisms using our method of cathepsin activity measurements.Moreover, after calibration of our system, we suggest our platform
could be adopted to target additional types of pathologies with high
cathepsin activity such as atherosclerosis[35] and arthritis.[36] The strategy described
here overcomes a major limitation of signal detection in deep tissue
that still exists with fluorescent protease substrates and fluorescent
activity-based probes that have been extensively reported during the
past decade. Thus, the ABPs reported here have the potential to be
developed for clinical use.
Authors: Galia Blum; Georges von Degenfeld; Milton J Merchant; Helen M Blau; Matthew Bogyo Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2007-09-09 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Sander M J van Duijnhoven; Marc S Robillard; Sander Langereis; Holger Grüll Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Eunkeu Oh; James B Delehanty; Kim E Sapsford; Kimihiro Susumu; Ramasis Goswami; Juan B Blanco-Canosa; Philip E Dawson; Jessica Granek; Megan Shoff; Qin Zhang; Peter L Goering; Alan Huston; Igor L Medintz Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Mehdi Azizi; Hassan Dianat-Moghadam; Roya Salehi; Masoud Farshbaf; Disha Iyengar; Samaresh Sau; Arun K Iyer; Hadi Valizadeh; Mohammad Mehrmohammadi; Michael R Hamblin Journal: Adv Funct Mater Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 18.808