Literature DB >> 30148283

Remote Sensing of Droplet Number Concentration in Warm Clouds: A Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives.

Daniel P Grosvenor1, Odran Sourdeval2, Paquita Zuidema3, Andrew Ackerman4, Mikhail D Alexandrov4,5, Ralf Bennartz6,7, Reinout Boers8, Brian Cairns4, J Christine Chiu9, Matthew Christensen10,11, Hartwig Deneke12, Michael Diamond13, Graham Feingold14, Ann Fridlind4, Anja Hünerbein12, Christine Knist15, Pavlos Kollias16, Alexander Marshak17, Daniel McCoy1, Daniel Merk12, David Painemal18, John Rausch6, Daniel Rosenfeld19, Herman Russchenberg20, Patric Seifert12, Kenneth Sinclair4,21, Philip Stier11, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven4,22, Manfred Wendisch2, Frank Werner23, Robert Wood13, Zhibo Zhang24, Johannes Quaas2.   

Abstract

The cloud droplet number concentration (N d) is of central interest to improve the understanding of cloud physics and for quantifying the effective radiative forcing by aerosol-cloud interactions. Current standard satellite retrievals do not operationally provide N d, but it can be inferred from retrievals of cloud optical depth (τ c) cloud droplet effective radius (r e) and cloud top temperature. This review summarizes issues with this approach and quantifies uncertainties. A total relative uncertainty of 78% is inferred for pixel-level retrievals for relatively homogeneous, optically thick and unobscured stratiform clouds with favorable viewing geometry. The uncertainty is even greater if these conditions are not met. For averages over 1° ×1° regions the uncertainty is reduced to 54% assuming random errors for instrument uncertainties. In contrast, the few evaluation studies against reference in situ observations suggest much better accuracy with little variability in the bias. More such studies are required for a better error characterization. N d uncertainty is dominated by errors in r e, and therefore, improvements in r e retrievals would greatly improve the quality of the N d retrievals. Recommendations are made for how this might be achieved. Some existing N d data sets are compared and discussed, and best practices for the use of N d data from current passive instruments (e.g., filtering criteria) are recommended. Emerging alternative N d estimates are also considered. First, new ideas to use additional information from existing and upcoming spaceborne instruments are discussed, and second, approaches using high-quality ground-based observations are examined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cloud droplet concentrations; lidar; passive retrievals; radar; remote sensing; satellite

Year:  2018        PMID: 30148283      PMCID: PMC6099364          DOI: 10.1029/2017RG000593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Geophys        ISSN: 8755-1209            Impact factor:   22.000


  12 in total

1.  Anthropogenic aerosols. Indirect warming effect from dispersion forcing.

Authors:  Yangang Liu; Peter H Daum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Holographic measurements of inhomogeneous cloud mixing at the centimeter scale.

Authors:  Matthew J Beals; Jacob P Fugal; Raymond A Shaw; Jiang Lu; Scott M Spuler; Jeffrey L Stith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing.

Authors:  Andrew S Ackerman; Michael P Kirkpatrick; David E Stevens; Owen B Toon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing.

Authors:  K S Carslaw; L A Lee; C L Reddington; K J Pringle; A Rap; P M Forster; G W Mann; D V Spracklen; M T Woodhouse; L A Regayre; J R Pierce
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Constraining the instantaneous aerosol influence on cloud albedo.

Authors:  Edward Gryspeerdt; Johannes Quaas; Sylvaine Ferrachat; Andrew Gettelman; Steven Ghan; Ulrike Lohmann; Hugh Morrison; David Neubauer; Daniel G Partridge; Philip Stier; Toshihiko Takemura; Hailong Wang; Minghuai Wang; Kai Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Dual-field-of-view Raman lidar measurements for the retrieval of cloud microphysical properties.

Authors:  Jörg Schmidt; Ulla Wandinger; Aleksey Malinka
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 1.980

7.  Differences in liquid cloud droplet effective radius and number concentration estimates between MODIS Collections 5.1 and 6 over global oceans.

Authors:  John Rausch; Kerry Meyer; Ralf Bennartz; Steven Platnick
Journal:  Atmos Meas Tech       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The MODIS cloud optical and microphysical products: Collection 6 updates and examples from Terra and Aqua.

Authors:  Steven Platnick; Kerry G Meyer; Michael D King; Galina Wind; Nandana Amarasinghe; Benjamin Marchant; G Thomas Arnold; Zhibo Zhang; Paul A Hubanks; Robert E Holz; Ping Yang; William L Ridgway; Jérôme Riedi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.600

9.  View angle dependence of MODIS liquid water path retrievals in warm oceanic clouds.

Authors:  Ákos Horváth; Chellappan Seethala; Hartwig Deneke
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 4.261

10.  Frequency and causes of failed MODIS cloud property retrievals for liquid phase clouds over global oceans.

Authors:  Hyoun-Myoung Cho; Zhibo Zhang; Kerry Meyer; Matthew Lebsock; Steven Platnick; Andrew S Ackerman; Larry Di Girolamo; Laurent C-Labonnote; Céline Cornet; Jerome Riedi; Robert E Holz
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.261

View more
  16 in total

1.  Weak average liquid-cloud-water response to anthropogenic aerosols.

Authors:  Velle Toll; Matthew Christensen; Johannes Quaas; Nicolas Bellouin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Global estimates of changes in shortwave low-cloud albedo and fluxes due to variations in cloud droplet number concentration derived from CERES-MODIS satellite sensors.

Authors:  David Painemal
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.720

3.  Effects of Biomass Burning on Stratocumulus Droplet Characteristics, Drizzle Rate, and Composition.

Authors:  Ali Hossein Mardi; Hossein Dadashazar; Alexander B MacDonald; Ewan Crosbie; Matthew M Coggon; Mojtaba Azadi Aghdam; Roy K Woods; Haflidi H Jonsson; Richard C Flagan; John H Seinfeld; Armin Sorooshian
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.261

4.  An Aerosol Climatology and Implications for Clouds at a Remote Marine Site: Case Study Over Bermuda.

Authors:  Abdulmonam M Aldhaif; David H Lopez; Hossein Dadashazar; David Painemal; Andrew J Peters; Armin Sorooshian
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.261

5.  Understanding the Microphysical Control and Spatial-Temporal Variability of Warm Rain Probability Using CloudSat and MODIS Observations.

Authors:  Zhibo Zhang; Lazaros Oreopoulos; Matthew D Lebsock; David B Mechem; Justin Covert
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 5.576

Review 6.  Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change.

Authors:  N Bellouin; J Quaas; E Gryspeerdt; S Kinne; P Stier; D Watson-Parris; O Boucher; K S Carslaw; M Christensen; A-L Daniau; J-L Dufresne; G Feingold; S Fiedler; P Forster; A Gettelman; J M Haywood; U Lohmann; F Malavelle; T Mauritsen; D T McCoy; G Myhre; J Mülmenstädt; D Neubauer; A Possner; M Rugenstein; Y Sato; M Schulz; S E Schwartz; O Sourdeval; T Storelvmo; V Toll; D Winker; B Stevens
Journal:  Rev Geophys       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 22.000

7.  The diurnal cycle of the smoky marine boundary layer observed during August in the remote southeast Atlantic.

Authors:  Jianhao Zhang; Paquita Zuidema
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 6.133

8.  Strong Dependence of Atmospheric Feedbacks on Mixed-Phase Microphysics and Aerosol-Cloud Interactions in HadGEM3.

Authors:  A Bodas-Salcedo; J P Mulcahy; T Andrews; K D Williams; M A Ringer; P R Field; G S Elsaesser
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 6.660

9.  Regional Biases in MODIS Marine Liquid Water Cloud Drop Effective Radius Deduced Through Fusion With MISR.

Authors:  Dongwei Fu; Larry Di Girolamo; Lusheng Liang; Guangyu Zhao
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2019-12-08       Impact factor: 4.261

10.  Significant underestimation of radiative forcing by aerosol-cloud interactions derived from satellite-based methods.

Authors:  Hailing Jia; Xiaoyan Ma; Fangqun Yu; Johannes Quaas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.