Literature DB >> 30148229

Experience with a simplified feeding jejunostomy technique for enteral nutrition following major visceral operations.

Michael J Minarich1, Roderich E Schwarz1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Background: Perioperative nutrition support has been shown to impact on outcomes for patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Postoperative benefits of feeding tubes must be weighed against morbidity related to placement and use. A simplified jejunostomy tube technique was evaluated for outcomes.
METHODS: A 16-Fr rubber tube is secured at the jejunal entry site without Witzel tunnel, followed by a continuous, circumferential and alternating suture between jejunal wall and parietal peritoneum. Prospectively collected data were analyzed.
RESULTS: The technique was performed in 343 of 803 major hepatopancreatobiliary and upper gastrointestinal (GI) resections (43%). Of these patients (male =57%, median age: 65.8 years, range, 24.0-98.0 years), 89% had a cancer diagnosis. The procedures included pancreatectomy (n=189, 55%), gastrectomy (n=109, 32%), esophagectomy (n=19, 6%) and others (n=26, 7%). The operative intent was curative in 78%, palliative in 10%, or combined in 12% of patients. Postoperative morbidity rate was 40%, with 19 lethal events (5.5%), and a median length of stay of 10 days (range, 4-111 days). Tube feeds were administered in 139 patients (41%), and in 17% continued beyond discharge. Use of the feeding tube was linked to treatment interval, length of stay, major complication grade (all at P<0.0001), metastatic stage (P=0.0007) and noncurative intent (P=0.001). Tube feeds beyond discharge were associated with time interval (P<0.0001), length of stay (P=0.0006) and noncurative intent (P=0.014). Tube-specific events in 38 patients (11%) were all minor, without any intraabdominal leak, infection or obstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: The technique described is safe and expedient, and the overall tube-related morbidity is low. This procedure can be recommended in cases at risk for major morbidity and nutrition support needs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Jejunostomy feeding tube; device-related morbidity; gastrointestinal cancer; postoperative nutrition support; postoperative outcomes

Year:  2018        PMID: 30148229      PMCID: PMC6088135          DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2018.06.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 2415-1289


  36 in total

1.  Feeding the gut early after digestive surgery: results of a nine-year experience.

Authors:  M Braga; L Gianotti; O Gentilini; S Liotta; V Di Carlo
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.324

2.  Outcome and cost-effectiveness of perioperative enteral immunonutrition in patients undergoing elective upper gastrointestinal tract surgery: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  M Senkal; V Zumtobel; K H Bauer; B Marpe; G Wolfram; A Frei; U Eickhoff; M Kemen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-12

Review 3.  Patient optimization for gastrointestinal cancer surgery.

Authors:  K C Fearon; J T Jenkins; F Carli; K Lassen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Nutritional approach in malnourished surgical patients: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Luca Gianotti; Luca Nespoli; Giovanni Radaelli; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-02

5.  A prospective, randomized trial of early enteral feeding after resection of upper gastrointestinal malignancy.

Authors:  M J Heslin; L Latkany; D Leung; A D Brooks; S N Hochwald; P W Pisters; M Shike; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Benefits versus risks: a prospective audit. Feeding jejunostomy during esophagectomy.

Authors:  Vikas Gupta
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Transverse Witzel-T-tube feeding jejunostomy.

Authors:  S D Schwaitzberg; D B Sable
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Tube jejunostomy as an adjunct to esophagectomy.

Authors:  S J Gerndt; M B Orringer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  A comparative analysis of safety and efficacy of different methods of tube placement for enteral feeding following major pancreatic resection. A non-randomized study.

Authors:  Mohammad Abu-Hilal; Anil K Hemandas; Mark McPhail; Gaurav Jain; Ioanna Panagiotopoulou; Tina Scibelli; Colin D Johnson; Neil W Pearce
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2010-01-08

10.  Comparison of needle catheter versus standard tube jejunostomy.

Authors:  J L Haun; J S Thompson
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative pain and rapid recovery of patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery: a randomized, double-blind trial.

Authors:  Yue'e Dai; Rong Jiang; Wenjie Su; Man Wang; Yue Liu; Yunxia Zuo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-12

Review 2.  Nutritional Support of Cancer Patients without Oral Feeding: How to Select the Most Effective Technique?

Authors:  Gonçalo Nunes; Jorge Fonseca; Ana Teresa Barata; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro; Pedro Pimentel-Nunes
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-10-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.