Literature DB >> 30148228

Clinical trends and effects on quality metrics for surgical gastroesophageal cancer care.

Roderich E Schwarz1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical therapy of mid-stage gastric cancer (GC) and other neoplastic conditions requiring gastric resection remains at the center of curative outcomes, while epidemiologic changes and multimodality treatment options have evolved rapidly. Putative quality metrics for gastrectomy such as R0 rate, total lymph node (LN) count or postoperative morbidity may depend partly on changing disease and treatment patterns, and deserve evaluation under various practice conditions.
METHODS: Data within a U.S.-based single surgical oncologist's practice over 15 years were prospectively recorded and retrospectively analyzed for clinicopathologic factors, operative treatment aspects and outcomes. Trends and spectrum changes over three time intervals were analyzed with contingency analysis and continuous data comparative statistics.
RESULTS: Of 179 patients undergoing gastric resection, 119 were male and 60 female, with a median age of 63 years (range, 24-98 years). Resections included 56 total, 56 subtotal/distal, 30 proximal and 37 segmental gastrectomies. Diagnoses included 96 GCs, 31 gastroesophageal (GE) junction (GEJ) cancers, 21 GI stromal tumors (GISTs), and 31 other conditions. Significant trends from first towards last time interval were observed for resection type (16% to 32% proximal, 9% to 30% segmental, P=0.0003), curative intent (76% to 98%, P=0.002), diagnosis (5% to 42% GEJ cancer, P<0.0001) and preoperative therapy use (0% to 58%, P<0.0001), among others. Intraoperative aspects showed significantly reduced blood loss (median: 500 to 150 mL) and transfusion requirements (39% to 4%), and an increased use of minimally invasive techniques over time (all at P<0.001). Among patients undergoing curative intent GC resection with LN dissection, total LN counts remained steady (mean: 26), while the number of involved LNs decreased (9.0 to 3.7, P=0.0003) and the R0 resection rate increased from 74% to 85% (P=0.05). The number of specimens with >15 LNs examined increased from 69.0% to 92.5% (P=0.022). At the same time, spleen preservation rate (91% overall) and major morbidity (16%) remained unchanged throughout. Postoperative length of stay decreased from a median of 12 to 8 days (P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This experience represents some variable practice patterns within a clinicopathologic spectrum of GE diseases. Postoperative or oncologic quality metrics have been sustained or did improve, which would support their utility for various practice settings; they compare favorably to other published U.S. experiences during the same time period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer (GC); gastrectomy; postoperative outcomes; quality metrics

Year:  2018        PMID: 30148228      PMCID: PMC6087800          DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2018.06.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 2415-1289


  39 in total

1.  Spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy at the time of gastrectomy for cancer: technical feasibility and early results.

Authors:  Roderich E Schwarz
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Volume and process of care in high-risk cancer surgery.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Yating Sun; Aaron Goldfaden; Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Therese A Stukel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable gastric cancer of advanced stage.

Authors:  Roderich E Schwarz; David D Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: a national hospital report card.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Andrew K Stewart; Mark S Talamonti; David P Winchester; Thomas R Russell; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Measurement and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes in surgery: an opportunity for improvement.

Authors:  Paul J Karanicolas; Kai Bickenbach; Shiva Jayaraman; Andrea L Pusic; Daniel G Coit; Gordon H Guyatt; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Preservation versus non-preservation of the duodenal passage following total gastrectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yu-Shang Yang; Long-Qi Chen; Xian-Xia Yan; Ya-Li Liu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Extensive Lymph Node Dissection Improves Survival among American Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma Treated Surgically: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Samer A Naffouje; George I Salti
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.720

Review 9.  Enhanced recovery protocols for major upper gastrointestinal, liver and pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Giles Bond-Smith; Ajay P Belgaumkar; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-01

10.  Trends and Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Colorectal Cancer between 2004 and 2012- an Analysis using National Inpatient Database.

Authors:  Meng-Tse Gabriel Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu; Chia-Chun Wang; Chia-Na Chang; Shih-Hao Lee; Matthew Lee; Tzu-Chun Hsu; Chien-Chang Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Margin Positivity in Resectable Esophageal Cancer: Are there Modifiable Risk Factors?

Authors:  Cary Jo R Schlick; Rhami Khorfan; David D Odell; Ryan P Merkow; David J Bentrem
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 5.344

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.