Literature DB >> 30145206

Accurate estimation of microscopic diffusion anisotropy and its time dependence in the mouse brain.

Andrada Ianuş1, Sune N Jespersen2, Teresa Serradas Duarte3, Daniel C Alexander4, Ivana Drobnjak4, Noam Shemesh5.   

Abstract

Microscopic diffusion anisotropy (μA) has been recently gaining increasing attention for its ability to decouple the average compartment anisotropy from orientation dispersion. Advanced diffusion MRI sequences, such as double diffusion encoding (DDE) and double oscillating diffusion encoding (DODE) have been used for mapping μA, usually using measurements from a single b shell. However, the accuracy of μA estimation vis-à-vis different b-values was not assessed. Moreover, the time-dependence of this metric, which could offer additional insights into tissue microstructure, has not been studied so far. Here, we investigate both these concepts using theory, simulation, and experiments performed at 16.4T in the mouse brain, ex-vivo. In the first part, simulations and experimental results show that the conventional estimation of microscopic anisotropy from the difference of D(O)DE sequences with parallel and orthogonal gradient directions yields values that highly depend on the choice of b-value. To mitigate this undesirable bias, we propose a multi-shell approach that harnesses a polynomial fit of the signal difference up to third order terms in b-value. In simulations, this approach yields more accurate μA metrics, which are similar to the ground-truth values. The second part of this work uses the proposed multi-shell method to estimate the time/frequency dependence of μA. The data shows either an increase or no change in μA with frequency depending on the region of interest, both in white and gray matter. When comparing the experimental results with simulations, it emerges that simple geometric models such as infinite cylinders with either negligible or finite radii cannot replicate the measured trend, and more complex models, which, for example, incorporate structure along the fibre direction are required. Thus, measuring the time dependence of microscopic anisotropy can provide valuable information for characterizing tissue microstructure.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusion MRI; Double diffusion encoding; Microscopic anisotropy; Microstructure imaging; Oscillating gradients

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30145206     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of white matter microstructure in patients with Parkinson's disease using microscopic fractional anisotropy.

Authors:  Yutaka Ikenouchi; Koji Kamagata; Christina Andica; Taku Hatano; Takashi Ogawa; Haruka Takeshige-Amano; Kouhei Kamiya; Akihiko Wada; Michimasa Suzuki; Shohei Fujita; Akifumi Hagiwara; Ryusuke Irie; Masaaki Hori; Genko Oyama; Yashushi Shimo; Atsushi Umemura; Nobutaka Hattori; Shigeki Aoki
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Nonparametric 5D D-R2 distribution imaging with single-shot EPI at 21.1 T: Initial results for in vivo rat brain.

Authors:  Jens T Rosenberg; Samuel C Grant; Daniel Topgaard
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.734

Review 3.  Connectome 2.0: Developing the next-generation ultra-high gradient strength human MRI scanner for bridging studies of the micro-, meso- and macro-connectome.

Authors:  Susie Y Huang; Thomas Witzel; Boris Keil; Alina Scholz; Mathias Davids; Peter Dietz; Elmar Rummert; Rebecca Ramb; John E Kirsch; Anastasia Yendiki; Qiuyun Fan; Qiyuan Tian; Gabriel Ramos-Llordén; Hong-Hsi Lee; Aapo Nummenmaa; Berkin Bilgic; Kawin Setsompop; Fuyixue Wang; Alexandru V Avram; Michal Komlosh; Dan Benjamini; Kulam Najmudeen Magdoom; Sudhir Pathak; Walter Schneider; Dmitry S Novikov; Els Fieremans; Slimane Tounekti; Choukri Mekkaoui; Jean Augustinack; Daniel Berger; Alexander Shapson-Coe; Jeff Lichtman; Peter J Basser; Lawrence L Wald; Bruce R Rosen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 7.400

4.  Revisiting double diffusion encoding MRS in the mouse brain at 11.7T: Which microstructural features are we sensitive to?

Authors:  Mélissa Vincent; Marco Palombo; Julien Valette
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Tensor-valued diffusion MRI in under 3 minutes: an initial survey of microscopic anisotropy and tissue heterogeneity in intracranial tumors.

Authors:  Markus Nilsson; Filip Szczepankiewicz; Jan Brabec; Marie Taylor; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Alexandra Golby; Danielle van Westen; Pia C Sundgren
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Brain White-Matter Degeneration Due to Aging and Parkinson Disease as Revealed by Double Diffusion Encoding.

Authors:  Kouhei Kamiya; Koji Kamagata; Kotaro Ogaki; Taku Hatano; Takashi Ogawa; Haruka Takeshige-Amano; Syo Murata; Christina Andica; Katsutoshi Murata; Thorsten Feiweier; Masaaki Hori; Nobutaka Hattori; Shigeki Aoki
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Test-retest reproducibility of in vivo oscillating gradient and microscopic anisotropy diffusion MRI in mice at 9.4 Tesla.

Authors:  Naila Rahman; Kathy Xu; Mohammad Omer; Matthew D Budde; Arthur Brown; Corey A Baron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Improved fibre dispersion estimation using b-tensor encoding.

Authors:  Michiel Cottaar; Filip Szczepankiewicz; Matteo Bastiani; Moises Hernandez-Fernandez; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; Markus Nilsson; Saad Jbabdi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Microscopic anisotropy misestimation in spherical-mean single diffusion encoding MRI.

Authors:  Rafael Neto Henriques; Sune N Jespersen; Noam Shemesh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  The sensitivity of diffusion MRI to microstructural properties and experimental factors.

Authors:  Maryam Afzali; Tomasz Pieciak; Sharlene Newman; Eleftherios Garyfallidis; Evren Özarslan; Hu Cheng; Derek K Jones
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.