Literature DB >> 32283273

Improved fibre dispersion estimation using b-tensor encoding.

Michiel Cottaar1, Filip Szczepankiewicz2, Matteo Bastiani3, Moises Hernandez-Fernandez4, Stamatios N Sotiropoulos3, Markus Nilsson5, Saad Jbabdi6.   

Abstract

Measuring fibre dispersion in white matter with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is limited by an inherent degeneracy between fibre dispersion and microscopic diffusion anisotropy (i.e., the diffusion anisotropy expected for a single fibre orientation). This means that estimates of fibre dispersion rely on strong assumptions, such as constant microscopic anisotropy throughout the white matter or specific biophysical models. Here we present a simple approach for resolving this degeneracy using measurements that combine linear (conventional) and spherical tensor diffusion encoding. To test the accuracy of the fibre dispersion when our microstructural model is only an approximation of the true tissue structure, we simulate multi-compartment data and fit this with a single-compartment model. For such overly simplistic tissue assumptions, we show that the bias in fibre dispersion is greatly reduced (~5x) for single-shell linear and spherical tensor encoding data compared with single-shell or multi-shell conventional data. In in-vivo data we find a consistent estimate of fibre dispersion as we reduce the b-value from 3 to 1.5 ms/μm2, increase the repetition time, increase the echo time, or increase the diffusion time. We conclude that the addition of spherical tensor encoded data to conventional linear tensor encoding data greatly reduces the sensitivity of the estimated fibre dispersion to the model assumptions of the tissue microstructure.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32283273      PMCID: PMC7255889          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  51 in total

1.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images.

Authors:  M Jenkinson; S Smith
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Diffusion time dependence of the apparent diffusion tensor in healthy human brain and white matter disease.

Authors:  C A Clark; M Hedehus; M E Moseley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Torben Schneider; Claudia A Wheeler-Kingshott; Daniel C Alexander
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution.

Authors:  J-Donald Tournier; Fernando Calamante; David G Gadian; Alan Connelly
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Effects of nongaussian diffusion on "isotropic diffusion" measurements: An ex-vivo microimaging and simulation study.

Authors:  Sune Nørhøj Jespersen; Jonas Lynge Olesen; Andrada Ianuş; Noam Shemesh
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging.

Authors:  P J Basser; J Mattiello; D LeBihan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  The link between diffusion MRI and tumor heterogeneity: Mapping cell eccentricity and density by diffusional variance decomposition (DIVIDE).

Authors:  Filip Szczepankiewicz; Danielle van Westen; Elisabet Englund; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Freddy Ståhlberg; Jimmy Lätt; Pia C Sundgren; Markus Nilsson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Quantification of anisotropy and orientation in 3D electron microscopy and diffusion tensor imaging in injured rat brain.

Authors:  Raimo A Salo; Ilya Belevich; Eppu Manninen; Eija Jokitalo; Olli Gröhn; Alejandra Sierra
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Searching for the neurite density with diffusion MRI: Challenges for biophysical modeling.

Authors:  Björn Lampinen; Filip Szczepankiewicz; Mikael Novén; Danielle van Westen; Oskar Hansson; Elisabet Englund; Johan Mårtensson; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Markus Nilsson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Multi-compartment microscopic diffusion imaging.

Authors:  Enrico Kaden; Nathaniel D Kelm; Robert P Carson; Mark D Does; Daniel C Alexander
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  What's new and what's next in diffusion MRI preprocessing.

Authors:  Chantal M W Tax; Matteo Bastiani; Jelle Veraart; Eleftherios Garyfallidis; M Okan Irfanoglu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 7.400

Review 2.  Estimating Brain Connectivity With Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Promise and Peril.

Authors:  Mark D Grier; Jan Zimmermann; Sarah R Heilbronner
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-04-27

3.  Toward nonparametric diffusion- T 1 characterization of crossing fibers in the human brain.

Authors:  Alexis Reymbaut; Jeffrey Critchley; Giuliana Durighel; Tim Sprenger; Michael Sughrue; Karin Bryskhe; Daniel Topgaard
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Separating Glioma Hyperintensities From White Matter by Diffusion-Weighted Imaging With Spherical Tensor Encoding.

Authors:  Jan Brabec; Faris Durmo; Filip Szczepankiewicz; Patrik Brynolfsson; Björn Lampinen; Anna Rydelius; Linda Knutsson; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Pia C Sundgren; Markus Nilsson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 5.152

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.