Literature DB >> 30144794

Inhospital outcome of elderly patients in an intensive care unit in a Sub-Saharan hospital.

M Lankoandé1, P Bonkoungou2, A Simporé2, G Somda3, R A F Kabore4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Burkina Faso, demographics are changing and we are seeing a growing prevalence of older patients in intensive care units. Elderly people have increased health care needs but there is a lack of geriatric specialists. This study aimed to analyze in-hospital outcome of patients aged over 65 years, admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at Yalgado Hospital.
METHODS: We carried out a 5-year retrospective study in the ICU of Yalgado Ouédraogo Hospital. Elderly patients with completed records were included. Baseline characteristics, clinical and outcome were analyzed.
RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred sixteen patients were admitted to ICU, 237 (11.2%) of whom were included. There were 70 females and 167 males. The median age was 71.7 ± 6.1 years. The overall mortality rate in ICU was 73%, of whom 90% died within 7 days after admission. In multivariate analysis, shock (Odds Ratio: OR = 2.2, p = 0.002), severe brain trauma (OR; 9.6, p = 0.002), coma (OR 5.8 p < 0.003), surgical condition (OR = 4.2, p = 0.003), ASAPS Score ≥ 8 (OR = 4.3, p = 0.001), complication occurring (OR = 5.2, p = 0.001) and stroke (OR = 3.7, p = 0.001) were independent factors.
CONCLUSION: Elderly patients were frequent in ICU and their mortality rate was high. Stroke, severe brain trauma, surgery, complications occurring during hospitalization were independent risk factors of death.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly; Intensive care unit; Mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30144794      PMCID: PMC6109456          DOI: 10.1186/s12871-018-0581-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol        ISSN: 1471-2253            Impact factor:   2.217


Background

Elderly is defined as a chronological age equal to or above 65 years worldwide or above 60 years in Africa [1]. Worldwide, the elderly population continues to grow due to increased life expectancy [2]. In 2015, the world elderly population rose by 55 million and the proportion reached 8.5% [3]. In Africa, the proportion of elderly accounted for 6.6% in 2015 and will reach 9.6% in 2050. This increase is also seen in Burkina Faso. In 1985, the census in Burkina Faso reported 319,496 elderly people accounting for 4% of the general population. [4] This rose to 475,812 (2.4%) in 2016 [5]. Despite the increase of the number of elderly people in Burkina Faso, their proportion is reduced by the explosion of births and the youth of the population. One of the consequences of the growth in the number of elderly patients is the increased requirement for admission to ICU. They require appropriate healthcare facilities, and special skills and human resources. They have higher morbidity and mortality because of associated co-morbidities. In developing countries, intensive care is limited by poverty, lack of equipment, inadequate skills and insufficient human resources. This study aims to assess outcomes for elderly patients admitted to ICU in the first referral teaching hospital Yalgado Ouédraogo in Burkina Faso.

Methods

We carried out a retrospective study of elderly patients admitted to the ICU of the tertiary Hospital Yalgado Ouédraogo over a five-year period (1st January, 2011 to 31st December, 2015). Yalgado Hospital is a tertiary care, governmental hospital, with an overall capacity of 800 beds and an 8 bed ICU where patients are managed by anesthesiologists. The average number of admissions to ICU was about 200 patients per year with a mortality of 51.6% [6]. The ICU is poorly equipped (one transport ventilator, one defibrillator and monitors). Patients receive fluid and electrolyte management, transfusions, oxygen, vasoactive drugs, and nutrition (parenteral and oral nutrition). Non-invasive ventilation and CPAP were not used. Relevant data recorded includes socio-demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, diagnosis, indications for ICU admission, Glasgow Coma Score at admission, the Ambulatory Simplified Acute Physiologic Score (ASAPS) [7], Charlson co-morbidity score, need for mechanical ventilation, blood transfusion and or hemodialysis, sepsis, shock on admission, length of stay and outcome. The Ambulatory Simplified Acute Physiologic Score is a scale used for patients admitted to ICU to evaluate the severity of their condition. Ethical and National Scientific Research and Technology Center (ENSRTC) approved the study. The Epidemiologic Information package version 7.1.5.0 was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics included frequency for nominal variables and mean ± standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges for continuous variables according to their distribution. Independent t-test (continuous variables) and Chi-square test (categorical variables) were used in univariate analysis when comparing age groups, survivors to non-survival patients. A p value 0.05 was considered as significant. The total sample was divided into three groups according to age (65–74 years or « young old », 75–84 years or old old, and > 85 years or oldest old).

Results

In total, 2116 patients were admitted to ICU of whom 237 (11.2%) were included in our study. The mean age was 71.7 ± 6.1 years, with male: female ratio of 2.3. The demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of patients (n = 237)

CharacteristicMeanNumberPercentages
Age (years)71.7 ± 6.1
 65–74 years16770.5
 75–84 years5824.5
 Over 84 years125
Gender
 Male16770.5
 Female7029.5
Residency
 Urban15967.1
 Rural area7832.9
Profession
 Retired4832.6
 Housewife3725.2
 Farmer3121.1
 Public/Private service3121.1
Referral facilities
 District hospital10745.1
 Regional hospital3916.4
 Dispensary31.3
 Teaching hospital198
 Private Hospital6929.1

Teaching Hospital (YO: 8 cases; Blaise Compaore Hospital: 6 cases; Sourou Sanou Hospital = 5 cases);

Demographic characteristics of patients (n = 237) Teaching Hospital (YO: 8 cases; Blaise Compaore Hospital: 6 cases; Sourou Sanou Hospital = 5 cases); Comorbidity was identified in 191 cases (80.6%) of which 49.4% (n = 117) had more than 2 comorbidities and 19.4% (n = 46) had none. The Charlson median score was 4.8. A score ≥ 4 was recorded in 89.4% at admission in ICU. Past histories of hypertension (50.6%), diabetes (23.6%) and peptic ulcers (6.3%) were common. The clinical features are summarized in Table 2. 42.1% of patients were comatose, with Glasgow coma score < 8. 100 (49.02%) patients had ASAPS score ≥ 8.
Table 2

Clinical characteristics of patients (n = 237)

Clinical characteristicsMeanNumberPercentage
Reasons of admission (n = 237)
 ACSa13356.1
 Shock7832.9
 Thermal burns114.6
 ARDSb93.8
 Poor condition62.5
Glasgow coma score (n = 214)9.6 ± 4.0
 < 89042.1
 8–147836.4
 154621.5
Blood Pressure (n = 237)
 Systolic Pressure132.5 ± 36.6
 Diastolic pressure78.1 ± 23.5
 Hypertension12452.3
 Hypotension3514.7
Temperature (n = 237)11146.8
 Hyperthermia
 Hypothermia93.8
ASAPS (n = 204)7.9 ± 3.5

ASAPS Ambulatory simplified acute physiologic score

aACS Alteration of consciousness

bARD Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical characteristics of patients (n = 237) ASAPS Ambulatory simplified acute physiologic score aACS Alteration of consciousness bARD Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Medical conditions (60%), particularly of the Central Nervous System (CNS) (37.97%), were the most common. Among all diseases, stroke was most frequent (27.4%) followed by peritonitis. Care was based on fluid and electrolyte management, pain relief, and supply of oxygen. Only 2 patients were mechanically ventilated. During hospitalization, complications occurred in 89 patients (37.55%) of which acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was the main one (10.55%). In total 173 (73%) patients died in ICU. Table 3 summarizes the diagnoses and in-hospital outcome of patients.
Table 3

Diagnosis and outcome of patients (n = 237)

Clinical dataNumberPercentage
Admission condition
 Medical condition18377.2
 Surgical condition5422.8
Diseases
 Stroke6527.4
 Prostate tumor2711.4
 Sepsis2610.9
 Trauma/Burn2510.5
 Bowel obstruction135.5
 Heart disease182.5
 Diabetes Acute metabolic complications208.4
 Kidney failure166.7
 Othera2711.4
 Total237100
Complications
 Sepsis2510.5
 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome3842.7
 Shock156.3
 Coma1921.3
 Bed sores83.4
 Acute pulmonary edema52.1
 Pulmonary aspiration52.1
 Pulmonary embolism10.4
 Otherb52.1
Outcomes
 Death in ICU17373
 Transfer to other ward4820.2
 Hospital discharge with physician authorization104.2
 Discharge without physician authorization62.5
 Total237100

aOther: anemia (n = 3), dehydratation (n = 2)

bHernia, blood disorder, ulcer, hydronephrosis, asthma, skin disease, leukemia

Diagnosis and outcome of patients (n = 237) aOther: anemia (n = 3), dehydratation (n = 2) bHernia, blood disorder, ulcer, hydronephrosis, asthma, skin disease, leukemia The mean length of ICU stay was 5.3 ± 7.4 days [IC 95%; 1–58]. Ninety percent of those that died, did so within a week while 10% died after a week. Survivors and non-survivors were comparable based on demographic data (Table 4). When comparing survivors to non-survivors, there was a significant difference related to the emergency context (p = 0.001), surgical condition (p = 0.003), coma condition (p = 0.001), shock (p = 0.002), Charlson score ≥ 8 (p = 0.03), ASAPS score 8 ≥ at admission (p = 0.0001), stroke (p < 0.0001), diabetic complication (p = 0.01), and complication in ICU (p = 0.001) in univariate analysis.
Table 4

Comparison of survivors and non-survivor’s patients (n = 237)

CharacteristicsAll patients(N = 237)Non-survivors(n = 173)Survivors(n = 64)p value
Age (Mean; years)71.7 ± 6.171.6 ± 5.972.1 ± 6.40.5
Age group (%)
 65–74167 (70.4)123 (73.6)44 (26.3)0.7
 75–8458 (24.5)42 (72.4)16 (27.6)0.9
 85 above12 (5.1)8 (66.6)4 (33.3)0.6
Gender
 Male (n = 167)167 (70.4)127 (76.05)40 (23.9)0.1
 Female (n = 70)70 (29.6)46 (65.7)24 (34.3)
Reference specialty (%)
 Emergency service134 (56.4)108 (80.6)26 (20.4)0.001
 Medicine21 (8.8)14 (66.6)7(33.8)0.4
 Surgery54 (22.8)49 (90.7)5(9.3)0.003
Reasons for admission
 ACS133 (56.1)109 (81.9)24 (18)< 0.001
 Poor condition6 (2.5)3 (50)3 (50)0.3
 Burn11 (4.6)7 (63.64)4 (36.4)0.4
 ARDS9 (3.8)7 (77.7)2 (22.2)1
 Shock78 (32.9)47 (60.3)31 (39.7)0.002
 Charlson Score (Median)4.8 ± 1.84.6 ± 1.75.09 ± 2.040.12
 ≥ 820 (8.4)11 (55)9 (45)0.03
 < 8217 (91.6)103 (47.4)76 (52.6)0.4
 Glasgow coma score (Mean valu)9.64 ± 4.018.9 ± 3.811.8 ± 3.60.03
 < 842.0669 (88.4)9 (11.5)< 0.001
 ≥ 857.958 (68.2)76 (31.8)
 ASAPS score (Mean)7.9 ± 3.58.6 ± 3.55.8 ± 2.6< 0.001
 ASAPS ≥8150 (87)13
 ASAPS < 8109 (63.5)36.6
Diagnosis
 Stroke65 (27.4%)57 (87.69%)8 (12.31%)0.001
 Peritonitis22 (9.3%)18 (81.82%)4 (18.18%)0.4
 AMCDA20 (8.4%)10 (50%)10 (50%)0.01
 SBTB19 (8%)18 (94.74%)1 (5.26%)0.02
 Bowel obstruction13 (5.5%)7 (53.85%)6 (46.15%)0.1
 Burn10 (4.2%)6 (60%)4 (40%)0.4
 Severe infection10 (4.2%)8 (80%)2 (20%)0.7
 Prostatic adenoma9 (3.8%)5 (55.56)4 (44.44)0.2
 Heart disease6 (2.5%)4 (66.67%)2 (33.33%)0.6
 Prostatic cancer5 (2.1%)1 (20%)4 (80%)0.01
 Inguinal hernia5 (2.1%)3 (60%)2 (40%)0.6
 OtherC53 (22.4%)36 (67.92%)17 (32.08%)0.1
Complications occurred in ICU
 Yes = 8989 (37.5%)80 (89.9%)9 (10.1%)< 0.001
 Non = 148148 (62.5%)93 (62.8%)55 (37.2%)
 Mechanical ventilation2 (0.8%)2 (100%)0Ki = 0.7
 Length of stay in ICU (mean)5.3 ± 7.45.2 ± 85.5 ± 5.10.8

ACS Alteration of consciousness, ARDS Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrom, AMCD Acute metabolic complication of diabetes, SBT Severe brain trauma

ICU Intensive Care Unit, ASAPS Ambulatory Simplified Acute Physiologic Score

A Acute Metabolic Complication of Diabetes

B Severe Brain Trauuma

C Other disease

Comparison of survivors and non-survivor’s patients (n = 237) ACS Alteration of consciousness, ARDS Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrom, AMCD Acute metabolic complication of diabetes, SBT Severe brain trauma ICU Intensive Care Unit, ASAPS Ambulatory Simplified Acute Physiologic Score A Acute Metabolic Complication of Diabetes B Severe Brain Trauuma C Other disease Most patients were between 64 to 74 years old. There was a significant difference between the age groups for Charlson score (p = 0.001) and complications in ICU (p = 0.01) (Table 5).
Table 5

Comparison of patients according to age group (n = 237)

Variables65–74 yearsn = 167 (70.4%)75–84 yearsn = 58 (24.5%)Over 84 yearsn = 12 (5.1%)p value
Age (Mean; years)68.3 ± 2.878.2 ± 2.586.6 ± 1.6< 0.001
Gender
 Male (n = 167)1184090.9
 Female (n = 70)49183
Reasons for admission
 ACS923360.9
 Poor condition682650.6
 Burn7210.7
 ARDS13600.4
 Shock11420.4
 Charlson Score (Median)4.55.16.30.001
 ≥ 812530.1
 < 8155539
 Glasgow coma score (mean)9.7 ± 4.029.4 ± 4.18.8 ± 3.50.6
 < 812530.1
 ≥ 8155539
 ASAPS score (Mean)7.9 ± 3.88.08 ± 2.98.1 ± 2.70.9
 ASAPS ≥8652580.1
 ASAPS < 8772240.4
Complications in ICU0.01
 Yes = 89651950.6
 Non = 148102397
 Mechanical ventilation2000.6
 Length of stay ICU (mean)5.3 ± 6.85.6 ± 9.22.7 ± 2.20.4
 Death123 (73.6)42 (72.4)8 (66.6)0.2

ACS Alteration of consciousness, ARDS Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrom, AMCD, Acute metabolic complication of diabetes, SBT Severe brain trauma

Comparison of patients according to age group (n = 237) ACS Alteration of consciousness, ARDS Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrom, AMCD, Acute metabolic complication of diabetes, SBT Severe brain trauma In multivariate analysis, surgery, coma at admission, shock, stroke, and severe brain trauma were independent risks factors of ICU death (Table 6).
Table 6

Risk factors for ICU mortality of elderly patients

DiagnosisAdjusted OR (CI 95%) p
Clinical situationReference
 Surgery4.2 [2.4–10.3]0.003
 Coma at admission2.9 [1.6–5.4]0.001
 Coma in ICU5.8 [2.3–14.6]
 Shock during admission2.2 [1.6–4.0]0.002
 ASAPS ≥84.3 [1.1–8.5]0.001
 Stroke3.7 [1.6–8.7]0.001
 Severe brain trauma9.6 [1.2–75.1]0.02
Complications occurred in ICU0.001
 NoReference
 Yes5.2 [2.4–11.3]0.001
Risk factors for ICU mortality of elderly patients

Discussion

This retrospective study found that elderly patients represented 11.2% of admissions to ICU. This rate is comparable to the (10%) of Owojuyigbe et al. [8] and the (16.6%) of Belayachi et al. [9]. In developed countries elderly admissions rate to ICU was high. The rate of admission in our study may be due to life expectancy shortness that reflects Burkinabè demographic profile. Patients mean age was 71.7 ± 6.1 years in our study. Other study found a mean age of 72 years in Morocco [9], 75.4 ± 6.8 years in Brasilia [10] and 73 years in Nigeria [8]. In our study, patients were mainly males. There was no correlation between gender and admission in the literature [8, 9]. Some studies reported similar results to ours [11, 12], but Fowler et al. [13] reported higher mortality in the female group. Patient outcome was poor in our study with a mortality rate of 73%. Belayachi et al. [9] in Morocco, Wade et al. [14] in Senegal reported 44.7 and 42.8% respectively. The high mortality reported in Africa compared to developed countries may be due to inadequate equipment, resources and care limitations [9]. Advanced age alone does not preclude successful outcome [15]. In multivariate analysis independent risk factors were surgical conditions, coma, shock during admission, ASAPS ≥8, stroke, severe brain trauma. This result is comparable to literature reports [16, 17]. In our findings, stroke was the main cause of hospitalization, followed by peritonitis. There is no difference between age groups in term of mortality. The mean length of stay in ICU was 5.3 ± 6.8 days. While 46.6% of patients died within the first 3 days of admission, 90% of patient died within a week. For patients over 84 years, LOS was shorter and in-hospital mortality was less than patients aged less than 84 years. This can be explained by the family taking their relative home once they understand that the outlook for recovery is bleak. This explains the relatively low mortality rate and short stay. The overall poor outcomes may be due to late consultation and poor quality of care due to the inadequate facilities, equipment and lack of medications. Delay in consultation may be related to limited education, use of traditional medicine, poverty with concern about hospital costs and poor transportation. This study has limitations due to being retrospective. We did not assess the impact of pre-hospitalization condition. Blood test abnormalities, and the impact of APACHE and SOFA scores on outcome were not evaluated and long-term mortality after hospital discharge was not studied.

Conclusion

These results show that elderly patients in ICU have a high risk of ICU death. Risk factors include coma at admission, shock state, high ASAPS, severe brain trauma, stroke and surgical condition. We need to better equip our ICU to assess and manage carefully elderly patients in order to reduce ICU mortality. Training geriatric specialists could improve chronic disease care of older patients and reduce their admission to ICU. A prospective study could give more information on risk and long term outcome of these frail patients.
  9 in total

1.  Short-term and long-term mortality in very elderly patients admitted to an intensive care unit.

Authors:  S E de Rooij; A Govers; J C Korevaar; A Abu-Hanna; M Levi; E de Jonge
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Long-term survival from intensive care: a review.

Authors:  Teresa A Williams; Geoffrey J Dobb; Judith C Finn; Steve A R Webb
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  [Interest of ambulatory simplified acute physiology score (ASAPS) applied to patients admitted in an intensive care unit of an infectious diseases unit in Dakar].

Authors:  N M Dia; I Diallo; N M Manga; S A Diop; L Fortes-Deguenonvo; N A Lakhe; D Ka; M Seydi; B M Diop; P S Sow
Journal:  Bull Soc Pathol Exot       Date:  2015-01-20

4.  [Outcome of elderly patients in an intensive care unit in Dakar, Senegal].

Authors:  K A Wade; A Diaby; E M Niang; A Diallo; B Diatta
Journal:  Med Sante Trop       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun

5.  Sex-and age-based differences in the delivery and outcomes of critical care.

Authors:  Robert A Fowler; Natasha Sabur; Ping Li; David N Juurlink; Ruxandra Pinto; Michelle A Hladunewich; Neill K J Adhikari; William J Sibbald; Claudio M Martin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Increased intensity of treatment and decreased mortality in elderly patients in an intensive care unit over a decade.

Authors:  Nicolas Lerolle; Ludovic Trinquart; Caroline Bornstain; Jean-Marc Tadié; Audrey Imbert; Jean-Luc Diehl; Jean-Yves Fagon; Emmanuel Guérot
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Prognostic factors in elderly patients admitted in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Francine de Cristo Stein; Raffaelle Kasprowicz Barros; Fernanda Seligman Feitosa; Diogo Oliveira Toledo; João Manoel da Silva Junior; Alexandre Marini Isola; Ederlon Rezende
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2009-08

8.  Long-term outcomes and clinical predictors of hospital mortality in very long stay intensive care unit patients: a cohort study.

Authors:  Jan O Friedrich; Gail Wilson; Clarence Chant
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Quality of life in patients aged 80 or over after ICU discharge.

Authors:  Alexis Tabah; Francois Philippart; Jean Francois Timsit; Vincent Willems; Adrien Français; Alain Leplège; Jean Carlet; Cédric Bruel; Benoit Misset; Maité Garrouste-Orgeas
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Clinical characteristics and cost of hospital stay of octogenarians and nonagenarians in intensive care nephrology unit.

Authors:  Simge Bardak; Serap Demir; Murside Esra Dolarslan; Berkan Karadurmus; Esra Akcali; Kenan Turgutalp; Bahar Tasdelen; Ahmet Kiykim
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Clinical Profile and Factors Affecting Outcomes in Elderly Patients Admitted to the Medical Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Rakesh Upparakadiyala; Subbarao Singapati; Manuj Kumar Sarkar; Swathi U
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-11

3.  Elderly trauma mortality in a resource-limited setting: A benchmark for process improvement.

Authors:  Brittney M Williams; Linda Kayange; Laura Purcell; Anthony Charles; Jared Gallaher
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.687

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.