Literature DB >> 18003954

Sex-and age-based differences in the delivery and outcomes of critical care.

Robert A Fowler1, Natasha Sabur, Ping Li, David N Juurlink, Ruxandra Pinto, Michelle A Hladunewich, Neill K J Adhikari, William J Sibbald, Claudio M Martin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that a patient's sex may influence the provision and outcomes of critical care. Our objective was to determine whether sex and age are associated with differences in admission practices, processes of care and clinical outcomes for critically ill patients.
METHODS: We used a retrospective cohort of 466,792 patients, including 24,778 critically ill patients, admitted consecutively to adult hospitals in Ontario between Jan. 1, 2001, and Dec. 31, 2002. We measured associations between sex and age and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU); use of mechanical ventilation, dialysis or pulmonary artery catheterization; length of stay in the ICU and hospital; and death in the ICU, hospital and 1 year after admission.
RESULTS: Of the 466,792 patients admitted to hospital, more were women than men (57.0% v. 43.0% for all admissions, p < 0.001; 50.1% v. 49.9% for nonobstetric admissions, p < 0.001). However, fewer women than men were admitted to ICUs (39.9% v. 60.1%, p < 0.001); this difference was most pronounced among older patients (age > or = 50 years). After adjustment for admission diagnoses and comorbidities, older women were less likely than older men to receive care in an ICU setting (odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.71). After adjustment for illness severity, older women were also less likely than older men to receive mechanical ventilation (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.81-0.97) or pulmonary artery catheterization (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.88). Despite older men and women having similar severity of illness on ICU admission, women received ICU care for a slightly shorter duration yet had a longer length of stay in hospital (mean 18.3 v. 16.9 days; p = 0.006). After adjustment for differences in comorbidities, source of admission, ICU admission diagnosis and illness severity, older women had a slightly greater risk of death in the ICU (hazard ratio 1.20, 95% CI 1.10-1.31) and in hospital (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.00-1.16) than did older men.
INTERPRETATION: Among patients 50 years or older, women appear less likely than men to be admitted to an ICU and to receive selected life-supporting treatments and more likely than men to die after critical illness. Differences in presentation of critical illness, decision-making or unmeasured confounding factors may contribute to these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18003954      PMCID: PMC2096494          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.071112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  33 in total

1.  The "gender gap" in autoimmune disease.

Authors:  M McCarthy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-09-23       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients.

Authors:  James Dean Sandham; Russell Douglas Hull; Rollin Frederick Brant; Linda Knox; Graham Frederick Pineo; Christopher J Doig; Denny P Laporta; Sidney Viner; Louise Passerini; Hugh Devitt; Ann Kirby; Michael Jacka
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Development and validation of a prognostic index for 1-year mortality in older adults after hospitalization.

Authors:  L C Walter; R J Brand; S R Counsell; R M Palmer; C S Landefeld; R H Fortinsky; K E Covinsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000.

Authors:  Greg S Martin; David M Mannino; Stephanie Eaton; Marc Moss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Outcome in elderly patients with severe infection is influenced by sex hormones but not gender.

Authors:  Matthias W A Angstwurm; Roland Gaertner; Jochen Schopohl
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Influence of patient gender on admission to intensive care.

Authors:  Rosalind Raine; C Goldfrad; K Rowan; N Black
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Gender-related differences in intensive care: a multiple-center cohort study of therapeutic interventions and outcome in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Andreas Valentin; Barbara Jordan; Thomas Lang; Michael Hiesmayr; Philipp G H Metnitz
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in anticipation of death in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Deborah Cook; Graeme Rocker; John Marshall; Peter Sjokvist; Peter Dodek; Lauren Griffith; Andreas Freitag; Joseph Varon; Christine Bradley; Mitchell Levy; Simon Finfer; Cindy Hamielec; Joseph McMullin; Bruce Weaver; Stephen Walter; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Biology or bias: practice patterns and long-term outcomes for men and women with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  D A Alter; C D Naylor; P C Austin; J V Tu
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  The influence of sex on pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Janice B Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.577

View more
  74 in total

1.  Development of demographics and outcome of very old critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units.

Authors:  Gerald C Ihra; Judith Lehberger; Helene Hochrieser; Peter Bauer; Rene Schmutz; Barbara Metnitz; Philipp G H Metnitz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Who Gets Early Tracheostomy?: Evidence of Unequal Treatment at 185 Academic Medical Centers.

Authors:  Joshua J Shaw; Heena P Santry
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Factors associated with nonadherence to early goal-directed therapy in the ED.

Authors:  Mark E Mikkelsen; David F Gaieski; Munish Goyal; Andrea N Miltiades; Jeffrey C Munson; Jesse M Pines; Barry D Fuchs; Chirag V Shah; Scarlett L Bellamy; Jason D Christie
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Equal for whom? Addressing disparities in the Canadian medical system must become a national priority.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Sex matters: gender disparities in quality and outcomes of care.

Authors:  Arlene S Bierman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Prognostic factors in critically ill patients suffering from secondary peritonitis: a retrospective, observational, survival time analysis.

Authors:  Christian P Schneider; Carol Seyboth; Markus Vilsmaier; Helmut Küchenhoff; Benjamin Hofner; Karl-Walter Jauch; Wolfgang H Hartl
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Intensive Care Units: A Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses.

Authors:  Ibrahim El-Haffaf; Jean-Alexandre Caissy; Amélie Marsot
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  The association of female sex with application of evidence-based practice recommendations for perioperative care in hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  Natalie Cho; Laura Boland; Daniel I McIsaac
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Variation in decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapies in US ICUs.

Authors:  Caroline M Quill; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Michael O Harhay; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Very old patients admitted to intensive care in Australia and New Zealand: a multi-centre cohort analysis.

Authors:  Sean M Bagshaw; Steve A R Webb; Anthony Delaney; Carol George; David Pilcher; Graeme K Hart; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.