Mary-Grace Reeves1, Suzann Pershing2, Armin R Afshar3. 1. Byers Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA. 2. Byers Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA. Electronic address: pershing@stanford.edu. 3. Retina Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate trends for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair and the influence of patient characteristics on repair type in a large US population including children and adults, between 2003 and 2016. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Setting: Administrative claims for beneficiaries in a large nationwide managed-care network, including Medicare Advantage, employer-sponsored, and commercial insurance. POPULATION: Beneficiaries undergoing RRD primary repair procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: RRD repair procedure type. RESULTS: We identified 31 995 beneficiaries with RRD over the study period, mean age 59.8 years. Ocular comorbidities, including pseudophakia (16.9%), vitreous hemorrhage (14.6%), myopia (2.9%), and lattice degeneration (11.0%), were more common among RRD than non-RRD patients. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) was consistently the most common repair procedure, increasing over time. Scleral buckle utilization declined and utilization of other procedures remained relatively constant. After adjustment for age, demographics, and geographic region, PPV was more likely among patients with pseudophakia (OR = 1.81, P < .001) and vitreous hemorrhage (OR = 1.38, P < .001). Lattice degeneration (OR = 1.42, P < .001) and younger age were associated with higher odds of scleral buckle. Pneumatic retinopexy was more likely among patients with better systemic health and less likely among patients with ocular comorbidities including vitreous hemorrhage or lattice degeneration. CONCLUSIONS: PPV is increasingly the most common RRD repair procedure across a broadly representative US population. However, other techniques are still preferred for some patients and, in aggregate, choice of repair procedure seems influenced by patient characteristics in a manner consistent with recommendations in the literature. Published by Elsevier Inc.
PURPOSE: To evaluate trends for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair and the influence of patient characteristics on repair type in a large US population including children and adults, between 2003 and 2016. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Setting: Administrative claims for beneficiaries in a large nationwide managed-care network, including Medicare Advantage, employer-sponsored, and commercial insurance. POPULATION: Beneficiaries undergoing RRD primary repair procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: RRD repair procedure type. RESULTS: We identified 31 995 beneficiaries with RRD over the study period, mean age 59.8 years. Ocular comorbidities, including pseudophakia (16.9%), vitreous hemorrhage (14.6%), myopia (2.9%), and lattice degeneration (11.0%), were more common among RRD than non-RRD patients. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) was consistently the most common repair procedure, increasing over time. Scleral buckle utilization declined and utilization of other procedures remained relatively constant. After adjustment for age, demographics, and geographic region, PPV was more likely among patients with pseudophakia (OR = 1.81, P < .001) and vitreous hemorrhage (OR = 1.38, P < .001). Lattice degeneration (OR = 1.42, P < .001) and younger age were associated with higher odds of scleral buckle. Pneumatic retinopexy was more likely among patients with better systemic health and less likely among patients with ocular comorbidities including vitreous hemorrhage or lattice degeneration. CONCLUSIONS: PPV is increasingly the most common RRD repair procedure across a broadly representative US population. However, other techniques are still preferred for some patients and, in aggregate, choice of repair procedure seems influenced by patient characteristics in a manner consistent with recommendations in the literature. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Nicolas A Yannuzzi; Charles Li; Danielle Fujino; Scott P Kelly; Flora Lum; Harry W Flynn; D Wilkin Parke Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 8.253