| Literature DB >> 30143731 |
David J X Tan1, Balaji Chattopadhyay1, Kritika M Garg1, Emilie Cros1, Per G P Ericson2, Martin Irestedt3, Frank E Rheindt4.
Abstract
Although edge-tolerant species are known to benefit from habitat fragmentation, less is known about the population genetic impacts fragmentation may exert on edge-tolerant species. We examined the landscape genomic structure of an edge-tolerant forest-dependent bird species, the Striped Tit-Babbler Mixornis gularis, in the heavily urbanized island of Singapore to determine if two centuries of fragmentation have led to signs of isolation and loss of population-genetic diversity in different parts of the island. We obtained a high-quality complete reference genome with 78x coverage. Using almost 4000 SNPs from double-digest RAD-Sequencing across 46 individuals, we found that the population has likely experienced a recent contraction in effective population size and presently exhibits low population genetic diversity. Using empirical and simulation-based landscape genomic analyses, we also found that the subtle population genetic structure observed in the Striped Tit-Babbler population in Singapore is likely driven by isolation by distance resulting from limited dispersal. Our results demonstrate that population genetic impoverishment and subdivision can accumulate at relatively rapid rates in edge-tolerant bird species such as the Striped Tit-Babbler as a result of fragmentation, and that subtle spatial genetic structure can be detected over fine spatial and temporal scales using relatively few multilocus genomic SNPs.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30143731 PMCID: PMC6109123 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31074-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Map of Singapore with wooded areas represented in green (unsampled areas) or in additional colours other than white (sampled areas). Sampling localities of the 46 individuals are indicated as black circles. Wooded areas were classified using the maximum likelihood supervised classification method in ArcMap v10.0 based on remote sensing imagery from the LandSat OLI/TIRS platform. Subsequent map compositing was conducted in QGIS v2.18.9 (http://qgis.osgeo.org).
Standard contiguity metrics for the three genome assemblies, ALLPATHS-LG, ABySS, and SOAPdenovo, showing the number of scaffolds (n.scaff), number of scaffolds longer than 1000 base pairs (n.scaff >1000), the N50 and N80 measures, the maximum scaffold length (max_scf_lgth), the total assembly length (Ass.lgth), as well as the total assembly length for scaffolds greater than 1000 base pairs (Ass_lgth_ctg > 1000).
| Assembler | n.scaff | n.scaff >1000 | N50 | N80 | max_scf_lgth | Ass.lgth | Ass_lgth_ctg >1000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALLPATHS-LG | 9,542 | 9,011 | 3,093,332 | 1,158,118 | 19,816,433 | 1,049,058,013 | 1,048,547,872 |
| ABySS | 2,003,503 | 65,683 | 88,266 | 23,906 | 1,364,009 | 1,252,241,058 | 1,006,935,606 |
| SOAPdenovo | 3,270,383 | 77115 | 75,763 | 33,056 | 2,562,666 | 1,913,786,802 | 1,237,693,708 |
Figure 2Principal components analyses of the sampled Striped Tit-Babbler individuals using (A) the kin filtered (n = 35) SNPset with the highly inbred individual from Admiralty Park (K1103) included, and (B) the kin-filtered (n = 35) SNPset with the highly inbred individual from Admiralty Park replaced with its less inbred kin (K1105). For both plots, PC1 and PC2 are plotted, with both plots showing that most of the individuals cluster into a single cloud, and the individuals from Admiralty Park falling out as outliers. The colour scheme follows that of Fig. 1.
Unfiltered and kin-filtered summary population statistics for both individual sub-populations and the overall population mean.
| Population Cluster | Unfiltered (n = 46) | Kin-filtered (n = 35) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Private | P | HObs | π | N | Private | P | HObs | π | |
| Polymorphic loci | ||||||||||
| Southern | 16 | 192 | 0.8451 | 0.2258 | 0.2271 | 11 | 213 | 0.8427 | 0.2281 | 0.2319 |
| Admiralty | 3 | 81 | 0.8685 | 0.2096 | 0.2093 | 2 | 77 | 0.8653 | 0.2117 | 0.2295 |
| Central Catchment | 27 | 515 | 0.8417 | 0.2294 | 0.2306 | 20 | 537 | 0.8383 | 0.2346 | 0.2367 |
| Overall | 46 | 0 | 0.8407 | 0.2269 | 0.2311 | 35 | 0 | 0.8376 | 0.2309 | 0.2361 |
| Fixed & Polymorphic Loci | ||||||||||
| Southern | 16 | 192 | 0.9983 | 0.0025 | 0.0025 | 11 | 213 | 0.9983 | 0.0025 | 0.0026 |
| Admiralty | 3 | 81 | 0.9985 | 0.0023 | 0.0023 | 2 | 77 | 0.9985 | 0.0024 | 0.0026 |
| Central Catchment | 27 | 515 | 0.9982 | 0.0025 | 0.0026 | 20 | 537 | 0.9982 | 0.0026 | 0.0026 |
| Overall | 46 | 0 | 0.9982 | 0.0025 | 0.0026 | 35 | 0 | 0.9982 | 0.0026 | 0.0026 |
Population statistics have been split into statistics for polymorphic loci only and for both polymorphic and fixed loci. Statistics include the total average number of individuals genotyped at each locus (N), the number of alleles unique to each population (Private), average major allele frequency (P), observed heterozygosity (HObs) and mean nucleotide diversity (π).
Filtered and unfiltered Weir and Cockerham’s FST values for each pairwise population comparison, with confidence intervals (in parentheses) calculated using 9,999 bootstraps across loci.
| Southern | Admiralty | Central Catchment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southern | — | 0.0261 (0.0169,0.0352) | 0.0073 (0.0052,0.0094) |
| Admiralty | 0.0606 (0.0525, 0.0688) | — | 0.0226 (0.0142,0.0310) |
| Central Catchment | 0.0124 (0.0105,0.0144) | 0.0558 (0.0483,0.0634) | — |
FST values on the lower diagonal were calculated using the full unfiltered SNP matrix (n = 46) while FST values on the upper diagonal were calculated using the kin-filtered SNP matrix (n = 35).
Median, mode, and 5%, 25%, 75%, and 95 quartile estimates from DYABC posterior distribution samples of demographic parameters.
| Parameter | Median | Mode | 5% Quantile | 25% Quantile | 75% Quantile | 95% Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ancestral Population Size (Ndec) | 107,000.00 | 691.00 | 1,670.00 | 19,300.00 | 367,000 | 828,000.00 |
| Time of Contraction (t) | 46.20 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 12.90 | 261.00 | 6,340.00 |
| Current Population Size (N1) | 544.00 | 67.70 | 10.00 | 150.00 | 2,930.00 | 30,700.00 |
Figure 3Spatial autocorrelograms showing the genetic correlation coefficient (r) for each distance bin (km) for the Striped Tit-Babbler population in Singapore. Dashed lines represent the upper and lower bounds of the 95% confidence intervals for r generated under the null hypothesis of random geographic distribution of the Striped Tit-Babbler for 999 permutations. 95% confidence interval error bars were calculated using 1,000 bootstraps over pairs of samples. Both the autocorrelograms (A) including the Admiralty Park individuals and (B) excluding the Admiralty Park individuals indicate that the Striped Tit-Babbler population in Singapore exhibits significant positive spatial autocorrelation for the first distance bin (0–1 km) and significantly negative spatial autocorrelation for the tenth and twelfth distance bins, with the high levels of genetic correlation and short distances suggesting that Striped Tit-Babbler individuals are likely to be poor dispersers.
Figure 4Simulated change in pairwise FST over time based on forward-in-time landscape genetic simulations, showing a relatively higher FST accumulation rate between Admiralty Park and all other subpopulations and a lower FST accumulation rate between the Central Catchment and Southern subpopulations.