Literature DB >> 30141753

Treated hydrocephalus in individuals with myelomeningocele in the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry.

Irene Kim1, Betsy Hopson2, Inmaculada Aban3, Elias B Rizk4, Mark S Dias4, Robin Bowman5, Laurie L Ackerman6, Michael D Partington7, Heidi Castillo8, Jonathan Castillo8, Paula R Peterson9, Jeffrey P Blount2, Brandon G Rocque2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVEAlthough the majority of patients with myelomeningocele have hydrocephalus, reported rates of hydrocephalus treatment vary widely. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of surgical treatment for hydrocephalus in patients with myelomeningocele in the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry (NSBPR). In addition, the authors explored the variation in shunting rates across NSBPR institutions, examined the relationship between hydrocephalus, and the functional lesion level of the myelomeningocele, and evaluated for temporal trends in rates of treated hydrocephalus.METHODSThe authors queried the NSBPR to identify all patients with myelomeningoceles. Individuals were identified as having been treated for hydrocephalus if they had undergone at least 1 hydrocephalus-related operation. For each participating NSBPR institution, the authors calculated the proportion of patients with treated hydrocephalus who were enrolled at that site. Logistic regression was performed to analyze the relationship between hydrocephalus and the functional lesion level of the myelomeningocele and to compare the rate of treated hydrocephalus in children born before 2005 with those born in 2005 or later.RESULTSA total of 4448 patients with myelomeningocele were identified from 26 institutions, of whom 3558 patients (79.99%) had undergone at least 1 hydrocephalus-related operation. The rate of treated hydrocephalus ranged from 72% to 96% among institutions enrolling more than 10 patients. This difference in treatment rates between centers was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Insufficient data were available in the NSBPR to analyze reasons for the different rates of hydrocephalus treatment between sites. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that more rostral functional lesion levels were associated with higher rates of treated hydrocephalus (p < 0.001) but demonstrated no significant difference in hydrocephalus treatment rates between children born before versus after 2005.CONCLUSIONSThe rate of hydrocephalus treatment in patients with myelomeningocele in the NSBPR is 79.99%, which is consistent with the rates in previously published literature. The authors' data demonstrate a clear association between functional lesion level of the myelomeningocele and the need for hydrocephalus treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CDC = Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; MOMS = Management of Myelomeningocele Study; NSBPR = National Spina Bifida Patient Registry; VP shunt; congenital; hydrocephalus; myelomeningocele; spina bifida

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30141753      PMCID: PMC8927992          DOI: 10.3171/2018.5.PEDS18161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr        ISSN: 1933-0707            Impact factor:   2.375


  14 in total

1.  Fetal myelomeningocele repair: short-term clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mark P Johnson; Leslie N Sutton; Natalie Rintoul; Timothy M Crombleholme; Alan W Flake; Lori J Howell; Holly L Hedrick; R Douglas Wilson; N Scott Adzick
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Treatment of myelomeningocele: a review of outcomes and continuing neurosurgical considerations among adults.

Authors:  Joseph H Piatt
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  [Spina bifida aperta--myelomeningocele. Hydrocephalus].

Authors:  J D Patet; C Lapras; J N Guilburd; C Lapras
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.553

4.  A new look at myelomeningoceles: functional level, vertebral level, shunting, and the implications for fetal intervention.

Authors:  Natalie E Rintoul; Leslie N Sutton; Anne M Hubbard; Brian Cohen; Jeanne Melchionni; Patrick S Pasquariello; N Scott Adzick
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele.

Authors:  N Scott Adzick; Elizabeth A Thom; Catherine Y Spong; John W Brock; Pamela K Burrows; Mark P Johnson; Lori J Howell; Jody A Farrell; Mary E Dabrowiak; Leslie N Sutton; Nalin Gupta; Noel B Tulipan; Mary E D'Alton; Diana L Farmer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Hydrocephalus in myelomeningocele.

Authors:  S C Stein; L Schut
Journal:  Childs Brain       Date:  1979

7.  Toward reducing shunt placement rates in patients with myelomeningocele.

Authors:  Aabir Chakraborty; Darach Crimmins; Richard Hayward; Dominic Thompson
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele and the need for cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement.

Authors:  Noel Tulipan; John C Wellons; Elizabeth A Thom; Nalin Gupta; Leslie N Sutton; Pamela K Burrows; Diana Farmer; William Walsh; Mark P Johnson; Larry Rand; Susan Tolivaisa; Mary E D'alton; N Scott Adzick
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Predictors of the need for cerebrospinal fluid diversion in patients with myelomeningocele.

Authors:  Blake C Phillips; Michael Gelsomino; Ambre' L Pownall; Eylem Ocal; Horace J Spencer; Mark S O'Brien; Gregory W Albert
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Reducing CSF shunt placement in patients with spinal myelomeningocele.

Authors:  Suresh Sankhla; G M Khan
Journal:  J Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  2009-01
View more
  6 in total

1.  Mortality by mode of delivery among infants with spina bifida in Texas.

Authors:  Renata H Benjamin; Adriana Lopez; Laura E Mitchell; KuoJen Tsao; Anthony Johnson; Peter H Langlois; Michael D Swartz; A J Agopian
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Determination of anatomic level of myelomeningocele by prenatal ultrasound.

Authors:  Katherine S Barnes; Sumit Singh; Ariana Barkley; Jacob Lepard; Betsy Hopson; Chase R Cawyer; Jeffrey P Blount; Brandon G Rocque
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Multidisciplinary spina bifida clinic: the Chicago experience.

Authors:  Nathan A Shlobin; Elizabeth B Yerkes; Vineeta T Swaroop; Sandi Lam; David G McLone; Robin M Bowman
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 1.532

4.  Current status and challenges of neurosurgical procedures for patients with myelomeningocele in real-world Japan.

Authors:  Masahiro Nonaka; Yumiko Komori; Haruna Isozaki; Katsuya Ueno; Takamasa Kamei; Junichi Takeda; Yuichiro Nonaka; Ichiro Yabe; Masayoshi Zaitsu; Kenji Nakashima; Akio Asai
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 1.532

5.  Factors Associated With Ambulation and Transfer Ability: A Study From the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry.

Authors:  Nicholas L Benjamin; Gina McKernan; Sara Izzo; Theresa M Crytzer; Gerald H Clayton; Pamela E Wilson; Amy J Houtrow; Brad E Dicianno
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Neurosurgical procedures for children with myelomeningocele after fetal or postnatal surgery: a comparative effectiveness study.

Authors:  Gordon Worley; Rachel G Greenberg; Brandon G Rocque; Tiebin Liu; Brad E Dicianno; Jonathan P Castillo; Elisabeth A Ward; Tonya R Williams; Jeffrey P Blount; John S Wiener
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 5.449

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.