Literature DB >> 30140900

Self-reported Patient Motivations for Seeking Cosmetic Procedures.

Amanda Maisel1, Abigail Waldman2,3,4, Karina Furlan5, Alexandra Weil1, Kaitlyn Sacotte1, Jake M Lazaroff1, Katherine Lin1, Diana Aranzazu6, Mathew M Avram2,7, Ashley Bell8, Todd V Cartee9, Alex Cazzaniga10, Anne Chapas11, Milene K Crispin12, Jennifer A Croix11, Catherine M DiGiorgio13,14, Jeffrey S Dover15,16,17, David J Goldberg6,18,19,20, Mitchel P Goldman21,22, Jeremy B Green10, Charmaine L Griffin23, Adele D Haimovic24,25, Amelia K Hausauer26,27, Shannon L Hernandez11, Sarah Hsu28, Omer Ibrahim29, Derek H Jones27, Joely Kaufman10, Suzanne L Kilmer30,31, Nicole Y Lee32, David H McDaniel23,33,34,35, Joel Schlessinger8, Elizabeth Tanzi36,37, Eduardo T Weiss38,39, Robert A Weiss27, Douglas Wu22, Emily Poon1, Murad Alam1,40,41.   

Abstract

Importance: Despite the growing popularity of cosmetic procedures, the sociocultural and quality-of-life factors that motivate patients to undergo such procedures are not well understood. Objective: To estimate the relative importance of factors that motivate patients to seek minimally invasive cosmetic procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, multicenter observational study was performed at 2 academic and 11 private dermatology practice sites that represented all US geographic regions. Adult patients presenting for cosmetic consultation or treatment from December 4, 2016, through August 9, 2017, were eligible for participation. Exposures: Participants completed a survey instrument based on a recently developed subjective framework of motivations and a demographic questionnaire. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were the self-reported most common motivations in each quality-of-life category. Secondary outcomes were other frequently reported motivations and those associated with specific procedures.
Results: Of 529 eligible patients, 511 agreed to participate, were enrolled, and completed the survey. Typical respondents were female (440 [86.1%]), 45 years or older (286 [56.0%]), white (386 [75.5%]), and college educated (469 [91.8%]) and had previously received at least 2 cosmetic procedures (270 [52.8%]). Apart from motivations pertaining to aesthetic appearance, including the desire for beautiful skin and a youthful, attractive appearance, motives related to physical health, such as preventing worsening of condition or symptoms (253 of 475 [53.3%]), and psychosocial well-being, such as the desire to feel happier and more confident or improve total quality of life (314 of 467 [67.2%]), treat oneself or celebrate (284 of 463 [61.3%]), and look good professionally (261 of 476 [54.8%]) were commonly reported. Motivations related to cost and convenience were rated as less important (68 of 483 [14.1%]). Most motivations were internally generated, designed to please the patients and not others, with patients making the decision to undergo cosmetic procedures themselves and spouses seldom being influential. Patients younger than 45 years were more likely to undertake procedures to prevent aging (54 of 212 [25.5%] vs 42 of 286 [14.7%] among patients ≥45 years; P < .001). Patients seeking certain procedures, such as body contouring (19 of 22 [86.4%]), acne scar treatment (36 of 42 [85.7%]), and tattoo removal (8 of 11 [72.7%]), were more likely to report psychological and emotional motivations. Conclusions and Relevance: This initial prospective, multicenter study comprehensively assessed why patients seek minimally invasive cosmetic procedures. Common reasons included emotional, psychological, and practical motivations in addition to the desire to enhance physical appearance. Differences relative to patient age and procedures sought may need further exploration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30140900      PMCID: PMC6233736          DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Dermatol        ISSN: 2168-6068            Impact factor:   10.282


  9 in total

1.  Motivations for seeking minimally invasive cosmetic procedures in an academic outpatient setting.

Authors:  Joseph F Sobanko; Anthony J Taglienti; Anthony J Wilson; David B Sarwer; David J Margolis; Julia Dai; Ivona Percec
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.283

2.  Self-perception and self-esteem of patients seeking cosmetic surgery.

Authors:  G A Ferraro; F Rossano; F D'Andrea
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 3.  Injectable Cosmetic Procedures for the Male Patient.

Authors:  Isabela T Wieczorek; Brian P Hibler; Anthony M Rossi
Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.114

Review 4.  Psychological investigations in cosmetic surgery: a look back and a look ahead.

Authors:  D B Sarwer; M J Pertschuk; T A Wadden; L A Whitaker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Psychosocial factors predicting the motivation to undergo cosmetic surgery.

Authors:  Tilmann von Soest; Ingela L Kvalem; Knut Chr Skolleborg; Helge E Roald
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Body image concerns of breast augmentation patients.

Authors:  David B Sarwer; Don LaRossa; Scott P Bartlett; David W Low; Louis P Bucky; Linton A Whitaker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  Motivating factors for seeking cosmetic surgery: a synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  Cynthia Figueroa Haas; Angela Champion; Danielle Secor
Journal:  Plast Surg Nurs       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec

Review 8.  Influence of surgical and minimally invasive facial cosmetic procedures on psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sotonye Imadojemu; David B Sarwer; Ivona Percec; Seema S Sonnad; Jennifer E Goldsack; Morgan Berman; Joseph F Sobanko
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 9.  A systematic review of the factors predicting the interest in cosmetic plastic surgery.

Authors:  Panagiotis Milothridis; Leonidas Pavlidis; Anna-Bettina Haidich; Efharis Panagopoulou
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2016 Sep-Dec
  9 in total
  16 in total

1.  Survey of Dermatologic Procedures in Transgender Adults.

Authors:  Laura Ragmanauskaite; Qi Zhang; Jin Kim; Darios Getahun; Michael J Silverberg; Michael Goodman; Howa Yeung
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.914

2.  The Future of Contract Research Organizations in Dermatology and Aesthetic Research.

Authors:  Mark Nestor; David Pariser; James Del Rosso; Dee Anna Glaser; David Goldberg; Glynis Ablon; Z Paul Lorenc; Julie Santos
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2022-09

Review 3.  Look Better, Feel Better, Live Better? The Impact of Minimally Invasive Aesthetic Procedures on Satisfaction with Appearance and Psychosocial Wellbeing.

Authors:  Lauren Hoffman; Sabrina Fabi
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2022-05

4.  An Investigation into the Pressures Experienced by Medical Masters Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic Based on the Perceived Stress Scale-14 and Its Alleviation Methods.

Authors:  Heyu Meng; Jianjun Ruan; Yanqiu Chen; Zhaohan Yan; Xiangdong Li; Fanbo Meng
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09

5.  Association Between the Use of Social Media and Photograph Editing Applications, Self-esteem, and Cosmetic Surgery Acceptance.

Authors:  Jonlin Chen; Masaru Ishii; Kristin L Bater; Halley Darrach; David Liao; Pauline P Huynh; Isabel P Reh; Jason C Nellis; Anisha R Kumar; Lisa E Ishii
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.611

6.  Treatment Motivations and Expectations in Patients with Actinic Keratosis: A German-Wide Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Trial.

Authors:  Theresa Steeb; Anja Wessely; Dagmar von Bubnoff; Thomas Dirschka; Konstantin Drexler; Conrad Falkenberg; Jessica C Hassel; Kinan Hayani; Svea Hüning; Katharina C Kähler; Sigrid Karrer; Christian Krammer; Ulrike Leiter; Diana Lill; Enklajd Marsela; Andreas Meiwes; Dorothée Nashan; Suzan Nasifoglu; Lutz Schmitz; Judith Sirokay; Alexander Thiem; Jochen Utikal; Alexander Zink; Carola Berking; Markus V Heppt
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Characteristics of Patients Seeking and Proceeding with Non-Surgical Facial Aesthetic Procedures.

Authors:  Sylvia P B Ramirez; Gunther Scherz; Helen Smith
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 8.  Microbiome and Human Aging: Probiotic and Prebiotic Potentials in Longevity, Skin Health and Cellular Senescence.

Authors:  Jacqueline Lena Boyajian; Merry Ghebretatios; Sabrina Schaly; Paromita Islam; Satya Prakash
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Motivations and characteristics of patients seeking minimally invasive cosmetic procedures in two Iranian dermatology centers: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sahar Dadkhahfar; Mehdi Gheisari; Yasamin Kalantari; Khatere Zahedi; Amirhooshang Ehsani; Etesami Ifa
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2021-07-18

10.  Expert Consensus on Hyaluronic Acid Filler Facial Injection for Chinese Patients.

Authors:  Hyoung-Jin Moon; Zhan-Wei Gao; Zhi-Qi Hu; Hang Wang; Xiao-Jun Wang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-10-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.