Literature DB >> 24068036

Influence of surgical and minimally invasive facial cosmetic procedures on psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review.

Sotonye Imadojemu1, David B Sarwer, Ivona Percec, Seema S Sonnad, Jennifer E Goldsack, Morgan Berman, Joseph F Sobanko.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Millions of surgical and minimally invasive cosmetic procedures of the face are performed each year, but objective clinical measures that evaluate surgical procedures, such as complication rates, have limited utility when applied to cosmetic procedures. While there may be subjective improvements in appearance, it is important to determine if these interventions have an impact on patients in other realms such as psychosocial functioning. This is particularly important in light of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and its emphasis on patient-centered outcomes and effectiveness.
OBJECTIVES: To review the literature investigating the impact of facial cosmetic surgery and minimally invasive procedures on relevant psychological variables to guide clinical practice and set norms for clinical performance. EVIDENCE REVIEW: English-language randomized clinical trials and prospective cohort studies that preoperatively and postoperatively assessed psychological variables in at least 10 patients seeking surgical or minimally invasive cosmetic procedures of the face.
FINDINGS: Only 1 study investigating minimally invasive procedures was identified. Most studies reported modest improvement in psychosocial functioning, which included quality of life, self-esteem, and body image. Unfortunately, the overall quality of evidence is limited owing to an absence of control groups, short follow-up periods, or loss to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The current literature suggests that a number of psychosocial domains may improve following facial cosmetic surgery, although the quality of this evidence is limited (grade of recommendation 2A). Despite the dramatic rise in nonsurgical cosmetic procedures, there is a paucity of information regarding the impact of chemodenervation and soft-tissue augmentation on psychosocial functioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24068036     DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Dermatol        ISSN: 2168-6068            Impact factor:   10.282


  12 in total

1.  Aesthetic Dermatologic Treatments: Consensus from the Experts.

Authors:  W Philip Werschler; Jacqueline M Calkin; David A Laub; Tess Mauricio; Vic A Narurkar; Phoebe Rich
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2015-10

2.  An evaluation of the influence of teeth and the labial soft tissues on the perceived aesthetics of a smile.

Authors:  M Y S Chan; S B Mehta; S Banerji
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Self-reported Patient Motivations for Seeking Cosmetic Procedures.

Authors:  Amanda Maisel; Abigail Waldman; Karina Furlan; Alexandra Weil; Kaitlyn Sacotte; Jake M Lazaroff; Katherine Lin; Diana Aranzazu; Mathew M Avram; Ashley Bell; Todd V Cartee; Alex Cazzaniga; Anne Chapas; Milene K Crispin; Jennifer A Croix; Catherine M DiGiorgio; Jeffrey S Dover; David J Goldberg; Mitchel P Goldman; Jeremy B Green; Charmaine L Griffin; Adele D Haimovic; Amelia K Hausauer; Shannon L Hernandez; Sarah Hsu; Omer Ibrahim; Derek H Jones; Joely Kaufman; Suzanne L Kilmer; Nicole Y Lee; David H McDaniel; Joel Schlessinger; Elizabeth Tanzi; Eduardo T Weiss; Robert A Weiss; Douglas Wu; Emily Poon; Murad Alam
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 10.282

4.  Assessing Improvement of Facial Appearance and Quality of Life after Minimally-Invasive Cosmetic Dermatology Procedures Using the FACE-Q Scales.

Authors:  Brian P Hibler; Jonathan Schwitzer; Anthony M Rossi
Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.114

5.  Impact of Minimally Invasive Aesthetic Procedures on the Psychological and Social Dimensions of Health.

Authors:  Darren J McKeown
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-04-28

6.  Prevalence and associated factors of minimally invasive facial cosmetic surgery in Chinese college students.

Authors:  Xingyue Jin; Mireille Twayigira; Wenjing Zhang; Xueping Gao; Xuerong Luo; Huiming Xu; Chunxiang Huang; Yanmei Shen
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Outpatient Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Excision and Reconstruction: A Clinical, Economical, and Patient Perception Analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Vittorio Emanuele Lisa; Valeriano Vinci; Leonardo Galtelli; Andrea Battistini; Matteo Murolo; Elena Vanni; Elena Azzolini; Marco Klinger
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-01-24

Review 8.  Application of Nonsurgical Modalities in Improving Facial Aging.

Authors:  Kelun Li; Fanyu Meng; Yu Ru Li; Yueyi Tian; Hao Chen; Qi Jia; HongXin Cai; Heng Bo Jiang
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-02-24

Review 9.  Nanocarriers as Active Ingredients Enhancers in the Cosmetic Industry-The European and North America Regulation Challenges.

Authors:  Cristiana Oliveira; Cristina Coelho; José A Teixeira; Pedro Ferreira-Santos; Claudia M Botelho
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Autologous Fat Transfer for Facial Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review on Technique, Efficacy, and Satisfaction.

Authors:  Jan-Willem Groen; Todor K Krastev; Juliette Hommes; Janneke A Wilschut; Marco J P F Ritt; Rene R J W van der Hulst
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-12-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.