Literature DB >> 30139879

PSMA Ligand PET/MRI for Primary Prostate Cancer: Staging Performance and Clinical Impact.

Bernhard Grubmüller1, Pascal Baltzer2, Sabrina Hartenbach3, David D'Andrea1, Thomas H Helbich2, Alexander R Haug4, Gregor M Goldner5, Wolfgang Wadsak4,6, Sarah Pfaff4, Markus Mitterhauser4,7, Theresa Balber4, Neydher Berroteran-Infante4, Marko Grahovac4, John Babich8, Christian Seitz1, Gero Kramer1, Martin Susani9, Peter Mazal9, Lukas Kenner9,10,11,12, Shahrokh F Shariat1,13,14, Marcus Hacker4, Markus Hartenbach15.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Primary staging of prostate cancer relies on modalities, which are limited. We evaluate simultaneous [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET (PSMA-PET)/MRI as a new diagnostic method for primary tumor-node-metastasis staging compared with histology and its impact on therapeutic decisions. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We investigated 122 patients with PSMA-PET/MRI prior to planned radical prostatectomy (RP). Primary endpoint was the accuracy of PSMA-PET/MRI in tumor staging as compared with staging-relevant histology. In addition, a multidisciplinary team reassessed the initial therapeutic approach to evaluate its impact on the therapeutic management.
RESULTS: PSMA-PET/MRI correctly identified prostate cancer in 119 of 122 patients (97.5%). Eighty-one patients were treated with RP and pelvic lymphadenectomy. The accuracy for T staging was 82.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 73-90; P < 0.001], for T2 stage was 85% (95% CI, 71-94; P < 0.001), for T3a stage was 79% (95% CI, 43-85; P < 0.001), for T3b stage was 94% (95% CI, 73-100; P < 0.001), and for N1 stage was 93% (95% CI, 84-98; P < 0.001). PSMA-PET/MRI changed the therapeutic strategy in 28.7% of the patients with either the onset of systemic therapy/radiotherapy (n = 16) or active surveillance (n = 19).
CONCLUSIONS: PSMA-PET/MRI can provide an accurate staging of newly diagnosed prostate cancer. In addition, treatment strategies were changed in almost a third of the patients due to the information of this hybrid imaging technique. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30139879     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  38 in total

1.  MUW researcher of the month.

Authors:  Bernhard Grubmüller
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 2.  Multimodality Imaging of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Soleen Ghafoor; Irene A Burger; Alberto H Vargas
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  [18F]Fluciclovine PET/CT: joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging-version 1.0.

Authors:  Cristina Nanni; Lucia Zanoni; Tore Bach-Gansmo; Heikki Minn; Frode Willoch; Trond Velde Bogsrud; Ephraim Parent Edward; Bital Savir-Baruch; Eugene Teoh; Fenton Ingram; Stefano Fanti; David M Schuster
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in prostate cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Frédéric Bois; Camille Noirot; Sébastien Dietemann; Ismini C Mainta; Thomas Zilli; Valentina Garibotto; Martin A Walter
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-12-15

5.  Phase I Study of CTT1057, an 18F-Labeled Imaging Agent with Phosphoramidate Core Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Spencer C Behr; Rahul Aggarwal; Henry F VanBrocklin; Robert R Flavell; Kenneth Gao; Eric J Small; Joseph Blecha; Salma Jivan; Thomas A Hope; Jeffry P Simko; John Kurhanewicz; Susan M Noworolski; Natalie J Korn; Romelyn De Los Santos; Matthew R Cooperberg; Peter R Carroll; Hao G Nguyen; Kirsten L Greene; Beatrice Langton-Webster; Clifford E Berkman; Youngho Seo
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET staging on clinical decision-making in patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniela A Ferraro; Helena I Garcia Schüler; Urs J Muehlematter; Daniel Eberli; Julian Müller; Alexander Müller; Roger Gablinger; Helmut Kranzbühler; Aurelius Omlin; Philipp A Kaufmann; Thomas Hermanns; Irene A Burger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on Staging and Management of Prostate Cancer Patients in Various Clinical Settings: A Prospective Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Ida Sonni; Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Rejah M Alano; Sitaram S Vangala; Amar U Kishan; Nicholas Nickols; Matthew B Rettig; Robert E Reiter; Johannes Czernin; Jeremie Calais
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Maximizing the use of batch production of 18F-FDOPA for imaging of brain tumors to increase availability of hybrid PET/MR imaging in clinical setting.

Authors:  Mariam Aboian; Ramon Barajas; Julia Shatalov; Vahid Ravanfar; Emma Bahroos; Elizabeth Tong; Jennie W Taylor; N Oberheim Bush; Patricia Sneed; Youngho Seo; Soonmee Cha; Miguel Hernandez-Pampaloni
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2020-10-14

Review 9.  [Positron emission tomography with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging for primary staging of prostate cancer].

Authors:  Ergela Hasa; Thomas Langbein; Matthias Eiber; Karina Knorr
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Feasibility of Different Tumor Delineation Approaches for 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT Imaging in Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Lena M Mittlmeier; Matthias Brendel; Leonie Beyer; Nathalie L Albert; Andrei Todica; Mathias J Zacherl; Vera Wenter; Annika Herlemann; Alexander Kretschmer; Stephan T Ledderose; Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann; Wolfgang G Kunz; Jens Ricke; Peter Bartenstein; Harun Ilhan; Marcus Unterrainer
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.