| Literature DB >> 30139813 |
Gang Li1, Haixia Jin1, Wenbin Niu1, Jiawei Xu1, Yihong Guo1, Yingchun Su1, Yingpu Sun2.
Abstract
Missed abortion is one of the common complications of assisted reproductive technology (ART). Genetic abnormality is the most important factor. However, the effect of ART on the molecular karyotype of products of conception (POC) remains unknown. We explored the effect of ART on the molecular karyotype of POC in miscarriage. POC were obtained from women undergoing ART. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray was used to analyze the molecular karyotype. A total of 1493 POC were collected for SNP array analysis. The total rate of karyotypic abnormalities was 63.1% (943/1493). The proportion of karyotypic abnormalities was 70.4% (193/416) in >35-year-old group, which was significantly higher than that (60.6%) (343/566) in <30-year-old group and that (60%) (307/511) in the 30-35-year-old group. In natural conception (NC) group, the proportion of karyotypic abnormalities was 64.6% (201/311), whereas in ART group it was 62.7% (742/1182) and, there was no significant difference. The ratio between male and female fetuses was 1:1.13 (698/795). The rate of karyotypic abnormalities in male was 62.9% (439/698) and that in female was 63.4% (504/795), and these values did not differ significantly (P=0.84). Molecular karyotypic abnormality is the most important reason in miscarriage, and female age is a significant factor influencing the karyotypic abnormalities. Comparison with NC, ART, and gender of aborted embryos may not increase the rate of molecular karyotypic abnormality in miscarriage.Entities:
Keywords: Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP); assisted reproductive technology (ART); missed abortion; molecular karyotype
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30139813 PMCID: PMC6435534 DOI: 10.1042/BSR20180605
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosci Rep ISSN: 0144-8463 Impact factor: 3.840
Basic characteristics of couples in the study
| Characteristic | Total | NC + AI | IVF | ICSI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Included couples, number | 1493 | 404 | 772 | 317 |
| Female age, years | 32.1 (5.3) | 31.1 (5.0) | 32.9 (5.4) | 32.3 (5.2) |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 21.9 (3.2) | 20.9 (3.3) | 22.2 (3.2) | 22.3 (3.1) |
| Male age, years | 33.3 (6.5) | 31.6 (6.3) | 34.2 (6.7) | 32.8 (6.4) |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 24.8 (3.8) | 24.7 (3.7) | 24.8 (3.9) | 24.9 (4.1) |
| Previous miscarriage | ||||
| 0 | 44% | 25% | 51% | 76% |
| 1 | 33% | 45% | 33% | 19% |
| ≥2 | 23% | 30% | 11% | 5% |
Data given as mean (S.D.) unless otherwise indicated.
Abnormal molecular karyotype in different age groups
| Age (years) | Normal molecular karyotype ( %) | Abnormal molecular karyotype ( %) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| <30 | 566 | 223 (39.4%) | 343 (60.6%) |
| 30-35 | 511 | 204 (40%) | 307 (60%) |
| >35 | 416 | 123 (29.6%) | 293 (70.4%) |
| Total | 1493 | 550 (36.8%) | 943 (63.2%) |
P=0.001 compared with <30-year-old group.
P=0.001 compared with <30-year-old group.
Figure 1Effect of ART on the molecular karyotype of POC
There is no significant difference in the rate of karyotypic abnormalities between the NC and ART groups (A). As for abnormal molecular karyotype in different modes of fertilization, there was no statistically significant difference amongst the NC + AI, IVF, and ICSI groups (B). The ratio between aborted male and female embryos was approximately 1:1.13. The rate of karyotypic abnormalities in male and female embryos was 62.9 and 63.4%, respectively. The difference between these two values was not statistically significant (C). P was calculated by Chi-square test analysis; *P>0.05.
Abnormal molecular karyotype in male/female group
| Gender of aborted embryos | Normal molecular karyotype (%) | Abnormal molecular karyotype (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 698 | 259 (37.1%) | 439 (62.9%) |
| Female | 795 | 291 (36.6%) | 504 (63.4%) |
| Total | 1493 | 550 (36.8%) | 943 (63.2%) |
P=0.08 compared with female group.
Contained 52 cases of 45, X.
Type of abnormal molecular karyotype in abortion tissue
| Molecular karyotype | ART (%) | NC (%) | Total (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autosomal trisomy | 487 (65.6%) | 110 (54.7%) | 597 (63.3%) |
| Deletion | 19 (2.6%) | 4 (2.0%) | 23 (2.4%) |
| Duplication | 37 (4.9%) | 12 (5.9%) | 49 (5.2%) |
| Triploidy | 42 (5.6%) | 21 (10.4%) | 63 (6.7%) |
| Autosomal monosomy | 18 (2.4%) | 0 (0) | 18 (1.9%) |
| Monosomy X | 35 (4.7%) | 17 (8.5%) | 52 (5.5%) |
| Mosaic | 27 (3.6%) | 8 (4.0%) | 35 (3.7%) |
| Uniparental disomy (UPD) | 16 (2.2%) | 12 (5.9%) | 28 (3.0%) |
| Complex abnormalities | 61 (8.2%) | 17 (8.5%) | 78 (8.3%) |
| Total | 742 | 201 | 943 |
Figure 2Molecular karyotype of POC using SNP microarrays
(A) Displays the trisomy chromosome 16 diagnostic reading obtained from miscarriage, AAA, AAB, ABB, and BBB alleles, and a significant shift in the smooth log R ratio is observed, consistent with the trisomy karyotype. (B) Shows the monosomy chromosome 21 diagnostic reading obtained from POC, AA, and BB alleles observed without AB and a significant shift in the smooth log R ratio is observed, consistent with the monosomy karyotype. (C) Demonstrates the duplication of q25.32→q29 reading of chromosome 3. AAA, AAB, ABB, and BBB alleles are observed from q25.32 to q29. A significant shift in the smooth log R ratio is observed from q25.32 to q29 of chromosome 3. (D) Presents the deletion of p26.1→pter reading of chromosome 1. AA, AB, and BB alleles are observed from p26.1 to qter of chromosome 1, however, AA and BB alleles are observed without AB from p26.1 to pter of chromosome 1 represented. A significant shift in the smooth log R ratio is observed from p26.1 to pter of chromosome 1.