Literature DB >> 24651128

Association between response to ovarian stimulation and miscarriage following IVF: an analysis of 124 351 IVF pregnancies.

Sesh Kamal Sunkara1, Yacoub Khalaf, Abha Maheshwari, Paul Seed, Arri Coomarasamy.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Is there a relationship between ovarian reserve, quantified as ovarian response to stimulation, and miscarriage rate following IVF treatment? SUMMARY ANSWER: There is a strong association between the number of oocytes retrieved and miscarriage rate following IVF treatment, with the miscarriage rate decreasing with an increasing number of oocytes and then levelling off: poor responders have a higher miscarriage rate across all age groups. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: Poor ovarian response is a manifestation of a decline in the quantity of the primordial follicle pool. Whether poor ovarian response is associated with a decline in oocyte quality contributing to miscarriage is however debated. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Anonymous data were obtained from the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA), the statutory regulator of assisted reproduction treatment (ART) in the UK. The HFEA has collected data on all ART performed in the UK since 1991. Data from 1991 to June 2008 involving 402 185 stimulated fresh IVF cycles and 124 351 pregnancy outcomes were analysed. PARTICIPANTS/ MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Data on all women undergoing a stimulated fresh IVF treatment cycle with at least one oocyte retrieved during the period from 1991 to June 2008 were analysed for their early pregnancy outcomes. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There was a strong association between the number of oocytes retrieved and the clinical miscarriage rate. The miscarriage rate fell from 20 to 13% with an increasing number of oocytes before levelling off. Stepwise logistic regression identified three cut-off points (4, 10 and 15 oocytes) at or beyond which the probability of clinical miscarriage fell. There was no increase in miscarriage rate with very high oocyte numbers (>20 oocytes). The lowest risk of miscarriage (9.9%) was for women under 38 years of age, with primary infertility without a female cause and producing more than three oocytes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although the analysis was performed only on stimulated IVF cycles (excluding unstimulated cycles), the data had the limitation that there was no information on the total gonadotrophin consumption. The model was adjusted for age and type of infertility, but the dataset contained no information on other confounders such as body mass index (BMI) of the women to allow adjustment. WIDER IMPLICATIONS FOR THE
FINDINGS: Analysis of this extensive dataset suggests that poor responders have a higher risk of clinical miscarriage, indicating that poor ovarian response is associated with a parallel decline in both oocyte quantity and quality. The miscarriage rate is also higher with advanced age, secondary infertility and a female cause of infertility compared with a younger age, male factor infertility and unexplained cause.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; miscarriage; oocyte quality; ovarian response

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24651128     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  20 in total

1.  Is anti-Müllerian hormone associated with IVF outcomes in young patients with diminished ovarian reserve?

Authors:  Nigel Pereira; Robert Setton; Allison C Petrini; Jovana P Lekovich; Rony T Elias; Steven D Spandorfer
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-22

2.  Oocyte cryopreservation beyond cancer: tools for ethical reflection.

Authors:  Alma Linkeviciute; Fedro A Peccatori; Virginia Sanchini; Giovanni Boniolo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Gonadotropin Stimulation Reduces the Implantation and Live Birth Rate but Not the Miscarriage Rate of Embryos Transferred When Compared to Unstimulated In Vitro Fertilization.

Authors:  Vera Ruth Mitter; Flavia Grädel; Alexandra Sabrina Kohl Schwartz; Michael von Wolff
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.060

4.  Incidence and risk factors for early pregnancy loss in women with first pregnancy undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

Authors:  Mohan Wang; Xiao Yang; Linlin Li; Haibo Zhu; Hongguo Zhang; Yuting Jiang; Ruizhi Liu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.105

5.  Live-Birth Rate Associated With Repeat In Vitro Fertilization Treatment Cycles.

Authors:  Scott M Nelson; Debbie A Lawlor; Andrew D A C Smith; Kate Tilling
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Association between uterine fibroids and antimüllerian hormone concentrations among African American women.

Authors:  Lia A Bernardi; Anne Waldo; Veronica J Berrocal; Lauren A Wise; Erica E Marsh
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Prospectively assessing risk for premature ovarian senescence in young females: a new paradigm.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Vitaly A Kushnir; David H Barad
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  Morphokinetic Characteristics and Developmental Potential of In Vitro Cultured Embryos from Natural Cycles in Patients with Poor Ovarian Response.

Authors:  N Hojnik; V Vlaisavljević; B Kovačič
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Variation of DNA Fragmentation Levels During Density Gradient Sperm Selection for Assisted Reproduction Techniques: A Possible New Male Predictive Parameter of Pregnancy?

Authors:  Monica Muratori; Nicoletta Tarozzi; Marta Cambi; Luca Boni; Anna Lisa Iorio; Claudia Passaro; Benedetta Luppino; Marco Nadalini; Sara Marchiani; Lara Tamburrino; Gianni Forti; Mario Maggi; Elisabetta Baldi; Andrea Borini
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Molecular cytogenetic analysis of early spontaneous abortions conceived from varying assisted reproductive technology procedures.

Authors:  Tonghua Wu; Biao Yin; Yuanchang Zhu; Guangui Li; Lijun Ye; Chunmei Chen; Yong Zeng; Desheng Liang
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.