| Literature DB >> 30139351 |
Andrey I Egorov1, Reagan Converse2, Shannon M Griffin3, Jennifer Styles2,4, Elizabeth Klein5, Elizabeth Sams2, Edward Hudgens2, Timothy J Wade2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Toxoplasma gondii infection can be acquired through ingestion of infectious tissue cysts in undercooked meat or environmental oocysts excreted by cats. This cross-sectional study assessed environmental risk factors for T. gondii infections and an association between latent infections and a measure of physiologic dysregulation known as allostatic load.Entities:
Keywords: Allostatic load; Biomarkers; Seroprevalence; Toxoplasma gondii; Vegetated land cover
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30139351 PMCID: PMC6108134 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-018-3343-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Descriptive statistics of the study population and univariate analysis of risk factors for T. gondii seropositivity
| Variable | Level | Participants, N (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All participants | 206 (100%) | 17 (8.3%) | ||
| Age | 18–30 | 88 (42.7%) | 2 (2.3%) | |
| 31–45 | 62 (30.1%) | 5 (8.1%) | ||
| 46–85 | 56 (27.2%) | 10 (17.9%) | 0.001a | |
| Sex | Males | 70 (34.0%) | 5 (7.1%) | |
| Females | 136 (66.0%) | 12 (8.8%) | 0.7 | |
| Race and ethnicity | White non-Hispanic | 110 (53.4%) | 8 (7.3%) | |
| All others | 95 (46.1%) | 9 (9.5%) | 0.6 | |
| Education | Less than bachelor’s degree | 100 (48.5%) | 10 (10.0%) | |
| Bachelor’s degree or higher | 106 (51.5%) | 7 (6.6%) | 0.4 | |
| Obesity | Not obese | 147 (71.4%) | 8 (5.4%) | |
| Obese | 59 (28.6%) | 9 (15.3%) | 0.03 | |
| Smoker | No | 148 (71.8%) | 9 (6.1%) | |
| Yes | 57 (27.7%) | 8 (14.0%) | 0.07 | |
| Residence | Chapel Hill | 60 (29.1%) | 4 (6.7%) | |
| Durham | 106 (51.5%) | 10 (9.4%) | ||
| Other towns | 40 (19.4%) | 3 (7.5%) | 0.8 | |
| Drinking water source at home | Private well or bottled water | 67 (32.5%) | 5 (7.5%) | |
| Municipal system | 136 (66.0%) | 12 (8.8%) | 0.7 | |
| Housing unit density | < 4 per acre | 178 (86.4%) | 14 (7.9%) | |
| > = 4 per acre | 28 (13.6%) | 3 (10.7%) | 0.6 | |
| Ever lived on a farm | No | 169 (82.0%) | 11 (6.5%) | |
| Yes | 37 (18.0%) | 6 (16.2%) | 0.06 | |
| Eat raw/undercooked chicken | No | 187 (90.8%) | 13 (7.0%) | |
| Yes | 14 (6.8%) | 3 (21.4%) | 0.07 | |
| Eat raw/undercooked pork | No | 188 (91.3%) | 14 (7.4%) | |
| Yes | 12 (5.8%) | 2 (16.7%) | 0.27 | |
| Eat raw/undercooked beef | No | 127 (61.7%) | 12 (9.4%) | |
| Yes | 74 (35.9%) | 4 (5.4%) | 0.31 | |
| Handles soil with bare hands weekly | No | 151 (73.3%) | 8 (5.3%) | |
| Yes | 53 (25.7%) | 8 (15.1%) | 0.03 | |
| Currently has at least one dog | No | 62 (30.1%) | 8 (12.9%) | |
| Yes | 144 (69.9%) | 9 (6.3%) | 0.12 | |
| Currently has at least one cat | No | 115 (55.8%) | 5 (4.3%) | |
| Yes | 91 (44.2%) | 12 (13.2%) | 0.03 | |
| Current outdoor cats | Do not have cats | 115 (55.8%) | 5 (4.3%) | |
| Has cats that don’t go outdoors | 30 (14.6%) | 2 (6.7%) | ||
| Has cats, let them go outdoors | 61 (29.6%) | 10 (16.4%) | 0.007a | |
| Total years lived with cats | 0–3 years | 115 (55.8%) | 4 (3.5%) | |
| 4 years or more | 91 (44.2%) | 13 (14.3%) | 0.01 | |
| Ever been responsible for cleaning a cat litter box | No | 75 (36.4%) | 3 (4.0%) | |
| Yes | 130 (63.1%) | 13 (10.0%) | 0.14 |
aCochran-Armitage test for trend was used; for all other variables, Chi-square Wald test was used
Stratified descriptive statistics on T. gondii seropositivity
| Strata | Substrata | Participants | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No outdoor cats | Does not handle soil weekly | 112 (54.4%) | 5 (4.5%) | |
| Handles soil with bare hands weekly | 31 (15.0%) | 1 (3.2%) | 0.76 | |
| Outdoor cats present | Does not handle soil weekly | 39 (18.9%) | 3 (7.7%) | |
| Handles soil with bare hands weekly | 22 (10.7%) | 7 (31.8%) | 0.02 |
Percent of vegetated land cover within specified distance from residence
| Measure of vegetated land cover | Median | Min - max | IQR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50 m average | 59.9 | 6.0–99.8 | 25.9 |
| 150 m average | 67.6 | 19.5–94.8 | 21.7 |
| 500 m average | 72.8 | 36.9–95.2 | 15.0 |
| 500 m weighted | 68.7 | 31.7–94.3 | 17.4 |
Results of multivariate regression analysis of predictors of T. gondii seropositivity; adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence limits. Model 1 – logistic model for socio-demographic and behavioral predictors; Model 2 – logistic model with an interaction effect; Model 3 – generalized additive model including vegetated land cover
| Predictor | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 1.08 (1.03, 1.14)* | 1.09 (1.03, 1.15)* | 1.12 (1.06, 1.17)* |
| Current smoking | 5.74 (1.29, 25.6)* | 5.16 (1.11, 23.9)* | 7.68 (1.78, 33.1)* |
| Obesity | 2.76 (0.67, 11.4) | 4.67 (1.01, 21.6)* | |
| Eating undercooked pork | 5.68 (0.81, 39.9) | 4.89 (0.71, 33.7) | 10.1 (1.52, 67.7)* |
| Housing unit density, units/acre | 1.30 (0.95, 1.77) | 1.30 (0.92, 1.83) | |
| Handling soil weekly | 5.34 (1.37, 20.7)* | 0.35 (0.03, 4.19) | |
| Currently owning a cat | 10.0 (1.98, 50.6)* | 12.1 (2.86, 51.5)* | |
| Owning an outdoor cat | 1.07 (0.16, 7.36) | ||
| Interaction effect of handling soil and owning outdoor cat | 82.2 (2.75, 2454)* | ||
| Two-dimensional spline function of geographic coordinates | |||
| Vegetated land cover within 500 m weighted, IQR increase | 3.67 (1.48, 9.08)* |
*p < 0.05
Comparison of associations between vegetated land cover measure and T. gondii seropositivity using generalized additive models (covariates as in Model 3 in Table 4)
| Vegetated land cover measure | IQR, % | Model deviance | aOR of |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50 m average | 25.9 | 68.94 | 2.39 (1.09, 5.24)* |
| 150 m average | 21.7 | 68.37 | 2.85 (1.20, 6.76)* |
| 500 m average | 15.0 | 67.79 | 3.01 (1.29, 7.00)* |
| 500 m weighted average | 17.4 | 67.13 | 3.67 (1.48, 9.08)* |
*p < 0.05
Results of regression analysis of predictors of AL, adjusted multiplicative effects on AL with 95% confidence limits
| Predictor variable | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, year | 1.01 (1.001, 1.02)* | 1.01 (1.004, 1.02)* | |
| Non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity | 1.20 (0.94, 1.54) | 1.37 (1.06, 1.78)* | |
| Education (bachelor’s degree or higher) | 0.83 (0.65, 1.06) | 0.73 (0.57, 0.94)* | |
| Log10(BMI) | 12.7 (4.15, 39.1)* | 10.8 (3.57, 32.9)* | |
| Vegetated land cover, per IQR increase | 0.62 (0.54, 0.72)* | ||
| Two-dimensional spline function of geographic coordinates | |||
| 1.69 (1.22, 2.35)* | 1.43 (1.01, 2.03)* | 1.63 (1.15, 2.33)* |
*p < 0.05
Fig. 1Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of having potentially unhealthy biomarker levels (high level above the 90th percentile or low level below the 10th percentile depending on the biomarker) in T. gondii seropositive individuals vs. seronegative controls
Fig. 2Adjusted multiplicative changes in median biomarker levels in T. gondii seropositive individuals compared to seronegative controls