Literature DB >> 30138876

On the overlap between scientific and societal taxonomic attentions - Insights for conservation.

Ivan Jarić1, Ricardo A Correia2, David L Roberts3, Jörn Gessner4, Yves Meinard5, Franck Courchamp6.   

Abstract

Attention directed at different species by society and science is particularly relevant within the field of conservation, as societal preferences will strongly impact support for conservation initiatives and their success. Here, we assess the association between societal and research interests in four charismatic and threatened species groups, derived from a range of different online sources and social media platforms as well as scientific publications. We found a high level of concordance between scientific and societal taxonomic attention, which was consistent among assessed species groups and media sources. Results indicate that research is apparently not as disconnected from the interests of society as it is often reproached, and that societal support for current research objectives should be adequate. While the high degree of similarity between scientific and societal interest is both striking and satisfying, the dissimilarities are also interesting, as new scientific findings may constitute a constant source of novel interest for the society. In that respect, additional efforts will be necessary to draw scientific and societal focus towards less charismatic species that are in urgent need of research and conservation attention.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Birds of prey; Carnivora; Charisma; Marine mammals; Primates; Societal attention

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30138876     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Taxonomic bias in occurrence information of angiosperm species in China.

Authors:  Wenjing Yang; Dandan Liu; Qinghui You; Bin Chen; Minfei Jian; Qiwu Hu; Mingyang Cong; Keping Ma
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 6.038

2.  Wildlife Photos on Social Media: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Conservation Organisations' Instagram Images.

Authors:  Meghan N Shaw; William T Borrie; Emily M McLeod; Kelly K Miller
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.231

3.  March Mammal Madness and the power of narrative in science outreach.

Authors:  Katie Hinde; Carlos Eduardo G Amorim; Alyson F Brokaw; Nicole Burt; Mary C Casillas; Albert Chen; Tara Chestnut; Patrice K Connors; Mauna Dasari; Connor Fox Ditelberg; Jeanne Dietrick; Josh Drew; Lara Durgavich; Brian Easterling; Charon Henning; Anne Hilborn; Elinor K Karlsson; Marc Kissel; Jennifer Kobylecky; Jason Krell; Danielle N Lee; Kate M Lesciotto; Kristi L Lewton; Jessica E Light; Jessica Martin; Asia Murphy; William Nickley; Alejandra Núñez-de la Mora; Olivia Pellicer; Valeria Pellicer; Anali Maughan Perry; Stephanie G Schuttler; Anne C Stone; Brian Tanis; Jesse Weber; Melissa Wilson; Emma Willcocks; Christopher N Anderson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Expanding conservation culturomics and iEcology from terrestrial to aquatic realms.

Authors:  Ivan Jarić; Uri Roll; Robert Arlinghaus; Jonathan Belmaker; Yan Chen; Victor China; Karel Douda; Franz Essl; Sonja C Jähnig; Jonathan M Jeschke; Gregor Kalinkat; Lukáš Kalous; Richard Ladle; Robert J Lennox; Rui Rosa; Valerio Sbragaglia; Kate Sherren; Marek Šmejkal; Andrea Soriano-Redondo; Allan T Souza; Christian Wolter; Ricardo A Correia
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Social actors' perceptions of wildlife: Insights for the conservation of species in Mediterranean protected areas.

Authors:  Ainara Cortés-Avizanda; Berta Martín-López; Henrique M Pereira; Ellen McKee; Olga Ceballos
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 5.129

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.