Literature DB >> 3013880

24-Hydroxylation of 1,25-dihydroxyergocalciferol. An unambiguous deactivation process.

R L Horst, T A Reinhardt, C F Ramberg, N J Koszewski, J L Napoli.   

Abstract

1,24,25-Trihydroxyergocalciferol was isolated from bovine kidney homogenates incubated with 1,25-dihydroxyergocalciferol and from chick kidney homogenates incubated with 24,25-dihydroxyergocalciferol. The identity was established by ultraviolet absorbance, sensitivity to periodate, nuclear magnetic resonance, and mass spectrometry. The new metabolite had an affinity equal to 1,24,25-trihydroxycholecalciferol for the bovine-thymus and chick-intestinal 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D receptor and had an affinity twice that of 1,24,25-trihydroxycholecalciferol for the rat-intestinal receptor. It was 3- and 6-fold less competitive than either 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol or 1,24,25-trihydroxycholecalciferol, respectively, for the rat plasma vitamin D transport protein. 1,24,25-Trihydroxyergocalciferol was at least 10-fold less active than 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol, 1,25-dihydroxyergocalciferol, and 1,24,25-trihydroxycholecalciferol at stimulating intestinal-calcium transport and was also relatively ineffective at stimulating bone-calcium resorption in rats. Moreover, in rats, [3H]1,24,25-trihydroxyergocalciferol was cleared from plasma approximately 40% faster than [3H]1,24,25-trihydroxycholecalciferol. These data suggest that C-24 hydroxylation of 1,25-dihydroxyergocalciferol represents a significant in vivo deactivation step, whereas equivalent deactivation of 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol seems to involve metabolic steps subsequent to C-24 hydroxylation (C-24 ketonization). C-24 ketonization of 1,25-trihydroxyergocalciferol would not be anticipated due to the presence of the 24(S)-methyl group. These results reveal further dissimilarities between ergocalciferol and cholecalciferol metabolism in mammals and suggest a mechanism for the lesser tendency of ergocalciferol to cause hypercalcemia relative to cholecalciferol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3013880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  16 in total

Review 1.  Influence of dietary components on regulatory T cells.

Authors:  Shohreh Issazadeh-Navikas; Roman Teimer; Robert Bockermann
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 6.354

Review 2.  Current Controversies: Are Free Vitamin Metabolite Levels a More Accurate Assessment of Vitamin D Status than Total Levels?

Authors:  Daniel D Bikle; Sofie Malmstroem; Janice Schwartz
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.741

Review 3.  Vitamin D Metabolism and Guidelines for Vitamin D Supplementation.

Authors:  Indra Ramasamy
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2020-12

Review 4.  Vitamin D metabolism, mechanism of action, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Daniel D Bikle
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2014-02-13

5.  Identification of a vitamin D responsive element in the promoter of the rat cytochrome P450(24) gene.

Authors:  C N Hahn; D M Kerry; J L Omdahl; B K May
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-06-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Vitamin D in patients with chronic kidney disease: a position statement of the Working Group "Trace Elements and Mineral Metabolism" of the Italian Society of Nephrology.

Authors:  Luigi Francesco Morrone; Pergiorgio Bolasco; Corrado Camerini; Giuseppe Cianciolo; Adamasco Cupisti; Andrea Galassi; Sandro Mazzaferro; Domenico Russo; Luigi Russo; Mario Cozzolino
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 7.  The serum vitamin D metabolome: What we know and what is still to discover.

Authors:  Robert C Tuckey; Chloe Y S Cheng; Andrzej T Slominski
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.292

8.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the response of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration to vitamin D supplementation from RCTs from around the globe.

Authors:  Minjia Mo; Shijie Wang; Zun Chen; Xiamusiye Muyiduli; Shuojia Wang; Yu Shen; Bule Shao; Minchao Li; Danqing Chen; Zexin Chen; Yunxian Yu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 9.  Vitamin D Assays.

Authors:  Daniel D Bikle
Journal:  Front Horm Res       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.606

Review 10.  Which vitamin D in CKD-MBD? The time of burning questions.

Authors:  Andrea Galassi; Antonio Bellasi; Sara Auricchio; Sergio Papagni; Mario Cozzolino
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.