| Literature DB >> 30138332 |
Sara Mahdavi1, David J A Jenkins1,2, Ahmed El-Sohemy1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the 9p21 region have been associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD), but previous studies have focussed on older populations. The objective of this study was to determine the association between 9p21 genotypes and biomarkers of CVD risk in young adults from different ethnocultural groups.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30138332 PMCID: PMC6107190 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202365
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Subject characteristics.
| Women (n = 1109) | Men (n = 517) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 22.5 ± 2.4 | 22.8 ± 2.4 | 0.08 |
| Height (cm) | 163.2 ± 6.5 | 175.9 ± 7.2 | < 0.001 |
| Weight (kg) | 59.7 ± 10.7 | 73.1 ± 12.7 | < 0.001 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.4 ± 3.5 | 23.6 ± 3.5 | < 0.001 |
| Waist circumference | 71.3 ± 7.6 | 80.1 ± 9.1 | < 0.001 |
| Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) | 109 ± 0 | 123 ± 1 | <0.001 |
| Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) | 68.4 ± 0.4 | 72.1 ± 0.8 | <0.001 |
| Genotype Frequency (% Risk Allele) | |||
| rs10757278 | 47 | 49 | |
| Ethnocultural group (%) | |||
| Caucasian | 48 | 48 | 0.84 |
| East Asian | 36 | 31 | 0.14 |
| South Asian | 9 | 14 | 0.005 |
| Other | 8 | 7 | 0.87 |
Values are mean ± standard error, p-values are for comparison between two sexes using unadjusted linear regression model. Chi-square test was used to test for differences between genotypes in categorical variables.
*Variables were log-transformed to normalize distribution before use in regression
Traditional biomarkers of CVD risk by rs10757278 genotype and ethnocultural group.
| Group | CVD Biomarker | Genotype | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All (n = 1,626) | |||||
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 4.77 ± 0.02 | 4.79 ± 0.01 | 4.79 ± 0.02 | 0.44 | |
| Insulin | 44.0 ± 1.6 | 47.7 ± 1.3 | 51.1 ± 2.1 | ||
| CRP | 1.35 ± 0.14 | 1.21 ± 0.08 | 1.25 ± 0.13 | 0.87 | |
| TG | 0.98 ± 0.14 | 0.98 ± 0.08 | 0.99 ± 0.13 | 0.99 | |
| HDL | 1.55 ± 0.02 | 1.54 ± 0.01 | 1.52 ± 0.02 | 0.71 | |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.27 ± 0.03 | 2.30 ± 0.02 | 2.27 ± 0.03 | 0.63 | |
| Caucasians (n = 771) | |||||
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 4.74 ± 0.02 | 4.77 ± 0.03 | 4.74 ± 0.02 | 0.54 | |
| Insulin | 40.3 ± 1.5 | 45.9 ± 2.0 | 46.9 ± 3.0 | 0.12 | |
| CRP | 1.45 ± 0.19 | 1.44 ± 0.13 | 1.45 ± 0.19 | 0.14 | |
| TG | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 0.97 ± 0.03 | 1.00 ± 0.04 | 0.99 | |
| HDL | 1.56 ± 0.04 | 1.55 ± 0.01 | 1.52 ± 0.04 | 0.48 | |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.30 ± 0.01 | 2.24 ± 0.05 | 2.23 ± 0.06 | 0.63 | |
| East Asians (n = 561) | |||||
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 4.77 ± 0.04 | 4.78 ± 0.06 | 4.83 ± 0.04 | 0.40 | |
| Insulin | 39.6 ± 1.7 | 44.6 ± 1.6 | 47.5 ± 2.9 | ||
| CRP | 0.99 ± 0.22 | 0.69 ± 0.12 | 0.81 ± 0.17 | 0.08 | |
| TG | 0.97 ± 0.08 | 0.93 ± 0.05 | 1.05 ± 0.08 | 0.37 | |
| HDL | 1.53 ± 0.03 | 1.60 ± 0.03 | 1.57 ± 0.08 | 0.14 | |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.23 ± 0.05 | 2.29 ± 0.06 | 2.31 ± 0.08 | 0.17 | |
| South Asians (n = 175) | |||||
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 4.87 ± 0.05 | 4.95 ± 0.07 | 4.85 ± 0.08 | 0.33 | |
| Insulin | 71.0 ± 12.0 | 61.2 ± 4.7 | 64.1 ± 6.0 | 0.63 | |
| CRP | 2.08 ± 0.70 | 1.69 ± 0.33 | 1.20 ± 0.38 | 0.33 | |
| TG | 0.99 ± 0.07 | 1.16 ± 0.11 | 0.78 ± 0.04 | 0.46 | |
| HDL | 1.49 ± 0.06 | 1.30 ± 0.04 | 1.38 ± 0.05 | ||
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.26 ± 0.10 | 2.57 ± 0.08 | 2.26 ± 0.06 | ||
| Others (n = 119) | |||||
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 4.78 ± 0.05 | 4.79 ± 0.06 | 4.88 ± 0.16 | 0.64 | |
| Insulin | 50.5 ± 31.4 | 56.3 ± 4.9 | 79.6 ± 16.3 | ||
| CRP | 1.44 ± 0.32 | 1.76 ± 0.45 | 2.44 ± 0.79 | 0.20 | |
| TG | 0.93 ± 0.06 | 0.97 ± 0.08 | 1.12 ± 0.12 | 0.39 | |
| HDL | 1.61 ± 0.06 | 1.49 ± 0.06 | 1.60 ± 0.09 | 0.45 | |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.26 ± 0.09 | 2.32 ± 0.11 | 2.41 ± 0.15 | 0.35 | |
| Women (n = 1109) | |||||
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 4.70 ± 0.02 | 4.74 ± 0.01 | 4.71 ± 0.02 | 0.37 | |
| Insulin | 43.4 ± 1.4 | 49.0 ± 1.6 | 55.7 ± 2.9 | ||
| CRP | 1.32 ± 0.15 | 1.35 ± 0.11 | 1.4 ± 0.18 | 0.91 | |
| TG | 0.94 ± 0.02 | 0.94 ± 0.02 | 0.98 ± 0.05 | 0.22 | |
| HDL | 1.64 ± 0.02 | 1.65 ± 0.02 | 1.63 ± 0.02 | 0.94 | |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.25 ± 0.03 | 2.27 ± 0.03 | 2.28 ± 0.04 | 0.81 | |
| Men (n = 517) | |||||
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 4.91 ± 0.03 | 4.92 ± 0.02 | 4.95 ± 0.04 | 0.74 | |
| Insulin | 45.5 ± 3.9 | 44.8 ± 1.9 | 42.4 ± 2.5 | 0.22 | |
| CRP | 1.43 ± 0.34 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.96 ± 0.17 | 0.81 | |
| TG | 1.06 ± 0.07 | 1.05 ± 0.05 | 1.02 ± 0.05 | 0.92 | |
| HDL | 1.34 ± 0.02 | 1.29 ± 0.02 | 1.31 ± 0.03 | 0.17 | |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.29 ± 0.06 | 2.36 ± 0.04 | 2.24 ± 0.06 | 0.22 | |
Values are mean ± standard error, p-values are for comparison between three genotypes using unadjusted linear regression model.
*Variables were log-transformed to normalize distribution for model building. CRP, C-reactive protein; HDL, high density lipoproteins; LDL, low density lipoproteins; TG, triglycerides.
Interaction of 9p21 SNPs with sex and ethnocultural groups.
| 9p21 SNP | p | p | p-interaction | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethnicity | Sex | Ethnicity x gene | Sex x gene | |
| rs10757274 | 0.16 | 0.89 | ||
| rs10757278 | 0.11 | 0.92 | ||
| rs2383206 | 0.06 | 0.82 | ||
| rs1333049 | 0.18 | 0.97 | ||
| rs4977574 | 0.43 | 0.68 |
p-values are for linear regression models adjusted for: ethnocultural group, sex, hormonal contraceptives in women, log-body mass index, diastolic blood pressure, log-waist circumference and plasma glucose
Fig 1Fasting serum insulin by 9p21 genotype (rs10757278) in women (A) and men (B). ANCOVA was adjusted for: log-body mass index, diastolic blood pressure, log-waist circumference and plasma glucose. Fasting Insulin (pmol/L) was log-transformed, but expressed as normal mean to facilitate interpretation. Different letters, a, b and c indicate statistically significant differences in insulin concentrations between genotypes (pairwise differences) within a group which were tested only if overall ANCOVA for the group was statistically significant. p-value at the top of each group is indicative of overall differences in each group for comparing all three genotypes within the group. CA; Caucasians, EA; East Asians, SA; South Asians.
Fasting insulin associated with rs10757278 according to HC use in women.
| Ethnocultural Group | AA | Genotype | GG | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No HC (n = 784) | 41.7 ± 1.7 | 48.5 ± 2.1 | 56.5 ± 3.9 | |
| On HC (n = 325) | 47.5 ± 2.6 | 50.1 ± 2.1 | 53.6 ± 3.9 | 0.63 |
| No HC (n = 295) | 37.7 ± 2.9 | 50.2 ± 4.3 | 53.2 ± 7.6 | |
| On HC (n = 223) | 46.2 ± 2.9 | 49.1 ± 2.5 | 51.1 ± 4.5 | 0.93 |
| No HC (n = 346) | 37.4 ± 2.0 | 44.2 ± 2.2 | 47.8 ± 3.8 | |
| On HC (n = 52) | 48.7 ± 6.1 | 50.2 ± 5.3 | 61.8 ± 10.2 | 0.31 |
| No HC (n = 87) | 53.8 ± 5.6 | 60.4 ± 7.1 | 77.1 ± 9.2 | |
| On HC (n = 18) | 69.0 ± 15.9 | 54.4 ± 10.4 | 46.5 ± 21.9 | 0.41 |
| No HC (n = 54) | 40.3 ± 5.3 | 55.5 ± 6.3 | 60.3 ± 11.5 | 0.60 |
| On HC (n = 28) | 58.8 ± 6.9 | 54.6 ± 7.3 | 85.5 ± 33.2 | 0.08 |
ANCOVA was adjusted for: log-body mass index, diastolic blood pressure, log-waist circumference and plasma glucose. Fasting Insulin was log-transformed to normalize distribution, but expressed as normal mean to facilitate interpretation. HC, hormonal contraceptives.