Literature DB >> 30138294

Challenges in Treating Acromioclavicular Separations: Current Concepts.

Jay B Cook1, Kevin P Krul.   

Abstract

Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint constitute approximately 3.2% of shoulder injuries. Although the overall goal of treatment continues to be return to activity with a pain-free shoulder, the treatment of acromioclavicular joint separations has been fraught with conflict since the earliest reports in both ancient and modern literature. Accurate diagnosis and classification are important to determine the optimal treatment. Nonsurgical therapy remains the mainstay for treatment of low- and most mid-grade injuries, although recent biomechanical and biokinetic data might suggest that patients are more affected than traditionally thought. High-grade injuries often necessitate surgical intervention, although little consensus exists on the timing or technique. New surgical techniques continue to evolve as more biomechanical data emerge and kinematic understanding improves. Challenges associated with management of this injury abound from diagnosis to reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30138294     DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  5 in total

1.  Clavicle and coracoid process periprosthetic fractures as late post-operative complications in arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular joint stabilization.

Authors:  Siva Thangaraju; Mark Tauber; Peter Habermeyer; Frank Martetschläger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The true axial shoulder projection: Diagnostic aid for acromioclavicular joint dislocation?

Authors:  S S Jassim; R Clough; T Yarashi; A Carlos; L Di Mascio
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-02-11

Review 3.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Better Radiographic Reduction and Lower Complication Rates With Combined Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Than With Isolated Coracoclavicular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jordan D Walters; Anthony Ignozzi; Francis Bustos; Brian C Werner; Stephen F Brockmeier
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-24

Review 5.  Surgical Management of Acute Rockwood Grade III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Isaac Okereke; Elsenosy Abdelfatah
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.