Literature DB >> 34659469

The true axial shoulder projection: Diagnostic aid for acromioclavicular joint dislocation?

S S Jassim1, R Clough1, T Yarashi1, A Carlos1, L Di Mascio1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Acromioclavicular joint dislocations are common. Differentiating between horizontal and vertical instability is challenging, but possible to diagnose on axial radiographs. No clear consensus for axial radiograph parameters currently exists. We aim to establish a reproducible technique to assess whether an axial radiograph represents a true axial view of the shoulder.
METHODS: One hundred CT scans of normal uninjured shoulders were examined using multiplanar reformatting to assess the distance between the anterior glenoid (reference line) and anterior-most aspect of the acromion in the axial plane. Measurements were repeated and performed by multiple observers to give of intra- and inter-observer reliability.
RESULTS: The mean distance from the anterior acromion to the reference line was -2.6 mm (i.e. posteriorly placed) (SD = 5.8 mm, range -16.9-13.2 mm). Most (89%) of the measurements were between 9 and -9 mm to the reference line. Intra-observer reliability was high with Cronbach's α measurement as 0.997. Inter-observer reliability gave a Cronbach's α measurement of 0.959.
CONCLUSION: When the anterior aspect of the acromion lies within 10 mm either side of a line parallel to the scapula blade at the anterior aspect of the glenoid on an axial radiograph, it represents a true axial projection of the glenohumeral joint (GHJ).Level of evidence: IV, Case series.
© 2020 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shoulder; acromioclavicular dislocation; diagnostic

Year:  2020        PMID: 34659469      PMCID: PMC8512986          DOI: 10.1177/1758573220905573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  15 in total

1.  Test reliability; its meaning and determination.

Authors:  L J CRONBACH
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1947-03       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint.

Authors:  O M ALEXANDER
Journal:  Radiography       Date:  1949-11

3.  The anterior borders of the clavicle and the acromion are not always aligned in the intact acromioclavicular joint: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Johannes Barth; Achilleas Boutsiadis; Pablo Narbona; Alexandre Lädermann; Paolo Arrigoni; Christopher R Adams; Stephen S Burkhart; Patrick J Denard
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Standard axillary radiographs of the shoulder may mimic posterior subluxation of the lateral end of the clavicle.

Authors:  Stefan Rahm; Karl Wieser; Christian Spross; Magdalena Vich; Christian Gerber; Dominik C Meyer
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  ISAKOS upper extremity committee consensus statement on the need for diversification of the Rockwood classification for acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  Knut Beitzel; Augustus D Mazzocca; Klaus Bak; Eiji Itoi; William B Kibler; Raffy Mirzayan; Andreas B Imhoff; Emilio Calvo; Guillermo Arce; Kevin Shea
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

Authors:  Terry K Koo; Mae Y Li
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-03-31

7.  Current Concepts in the Operative Management of Acromioclavicular Dislocations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Operative Techniques.

Authors:  Anirudh K Gowd; Joseph N Liu; Brandon C Cabarcas; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Grant H Garcia; Brandon J Manderle; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Defining residual radial translation of distal radius fractures: a potential cause of distal radioulnar joint instability.

Authors:  Mark Ross; Livio Di Mascio; Susan Peters; Allen Cockfield; Fraser Taylor; Greg Couzens
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2014-02

9.  New quantitative radiographic parameters for vertical and horizontal instability in acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Matthias A Zumstein; Philippe Schiessl; Benedikt Ambuehl; Lilianna Bolliger; Johannes Weihs; Martin H Maurer; Beat K Moor; Michael Schaer; Sumit Raniga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  The acutely injured acromioclavicular joint - which imaging modalities should be used for accurate diagnosis? A systematic review.

Authors:  Jonas Pogorzelski; Knut Beitzel; Francesco Ranuccio; Klaus Wörtler; Andreas B Imhoff; Peter J Millett; Sepp Braun
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.