| Literature DB >> 30136189 |
Nasser Nassiri Koopaei1,2, Parissa Khadiv-Parsi1, Mohammad Reza Khoshayand3, Mohammad Ali Mazlomi4, Abbas Kebriaeezadeh5, Hamid Moloudian3, Roya Solhi2, Mahdi Aminian6,7.
Abstract
High yield recombinant protein production is highly desirable for biotechnological purposes. In the design of recombinant expression conditions, a number of essential central elements such as expression strain, type of medium, bioprocess optimization, and mathematical modeling should be considered. Well-designed industrial scale production of one recombinant protein with optimized influential parameters and yield can address the cost and production reproducibility issues. In the present study, statistical experimental design methodology was used to investigate the effect of fermentation conditions (dissolved oxygen, IPTG, and temperature) on rPDT production by Escherichia coli. rPDT is a recombinant fusion protein consisting of three different protein domains including the N-terminal 179 amino acid fragment of the S1 subunit of pertussis toxin, the full-length genetically detoxified diphtheria toxin (CRM197), and the 50 kDa tetanus toxin fragment C. A 15 Box-Behnken design augmented with center points revealed that IPTG and DO at the center point and low temperature will result in high yield. The optimal condition for rPDT production were found to be 100 µM IPTG, DO 30% and temperature 20 °C.Entities:
Keywords: Bacterial toxin; Box–Behnken design; Fermentation optimization; Recombinant fusion protein; Statistical experimental design
Year: 2018 PMID: 30136189 PMCID: PMC6104467 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-018-0667-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Coded and real values for the Box–Behnken design
| Variable | Variable code | − 1 | 0 | + 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (°C) | X1 | 20 | 30 | 40 |
| DO (%) | X2 | 10 | 30 | 50 |
| IPTG (μM) | X3 | 25 | 112.5 | 200 |
Box–Behnken design matrix
| Run | T | DO | IPTG | rPDT band intensity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | 10 | 112.5 | 10934.5 |
| 2 | 40 | 10 | 112.5 | 6874.91 |
| 3 | 20 | 50 | 112.5 | 11531.7 |
| 4 | 40 | 50 | 112.5 | 6147.456 |
| 5 | 20 | 30 | 25 | 10745.06 |
| 6 | 40 | 30 | 25 | 5949.517 |
| 7 | 20 | 30 | 200 | 11619.7 |
| 8 | 40 | 30 | 200 | 6395.547 |
| 9 | 30 | 10 | 25 | 8968.991 |
| 10 | 30 | 50 | 25 | 9389.53 |
| 11 | 30 | 10 | 200 | 9104.195 |
| 12 | 30 | 50 | 200 | 9437.547 |
| 13 | 30 | 30 | 112.5 | 9953.16 |
| 14 | 30 | 30 | 112.5 | 10302.3 |
| 15 | 30 | 30 | 112.5 | 10235 |
Fig. 1Growth kinetics of Escherichia coli in the basal fermentation condition
Fig. 2Comparative western blotting of the PDT protein; experimental runs 1–8
Fig. 3Residual plot, internally Studentized residuals versus predicted values
Fig. 4Half-normal probability plot
Fig. 5a Response surface plot showing the interactive effect of DO and temperature on rPDT expression by E. coli. b Response surface plot showing the interactive effect of IPTG and temperature on rPDT expression by E. coli. c Response surface plot showing the interactive effect of DO and IPTG on rPDT expression by E. coli
ANOVA for Box–Behnken design
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | F value | p-value prob > F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 5.562E+007 | 9 | 6.180E+006 | 73.81 | < 0.0001 |
| A-T | 4.735E+007 | 1 | 4.735E+007 | 565.51 | < 0.0001 |
| B-DO | 48615.39 | 1 | 48615.39 | 0.58 | 0.4710 |
| C-IPTG | 2.827E+005 | 1 | 2.827E+005 | 3.38 | 0.1088 |
| AB | 4.387E+005 | 1 | 4.387E+005 | 5.24 | 0.0559 |
| AC | 45926.63 | 1 | 45926.63 | 0.55 | 0.4830 |
| BC | 1900.39 | 1 | 1900.39 | 0.023 | 0.8845 |
| A2 | 4.177E+006 | 1 | 4.177E+006 | 49.88 | 0.0002 |
| B2 | 8.466E+005 | 1 | 8.466E+005 | 10.11 | 0.0155 |
| C2 | 1.741E+006 | 1 | 1.741E+006 | 20.80 | 0.0026 |
| Residual | 5.862E+005 | 7 | 83736.38 | ||
| Lack of fit | 3.009E+005 | 3 | 1.003E+005 | 1.41 | 0.3637 |
| Pure error | 2.853E+005 | 4 | 71316.17 | ||
| Cor total | 5.621E+007 | 16 | Square |