| Literature DB >> 30135889 |
Gibwa Cole1, Duncan Miller1, Tasneem Ebrahim1, Tannith Dreyden1, Rory Simpson1, Shamila Manie1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In South Africa, pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) remains a problem of epidemic proportions. Despite evidence demonstrating persistent lung impairment after PTB cure, few population-based South African studies have investigated this finding. Pulmonary rehabilitation post-cure is not routinely received.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 30135889 PMCID: PMC6093099 DOI: 10.4102/sajp.v72i1.307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: S Afr J Physiother ISSN: 0379-6175
Descriptive statistics of sample (n = 55).
| Variable | Number | Percentage | Mean* | Median | SD | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 15 | 27.27% | - | - | - | - |
| Female | 40 | 72.73% | - | - | - | - |
| Employed | 17 | 30.91% | - | - | - | - |
| HIV positive | 43 | 78.18% | - | - | - | - |
| Currently smoking | 12 | 21.82% | - | - | - | - |
| Current PTB | 12 | 21.82% | - | - | - | - |
| Previous PTB | 15 | 27.27% | - | - | - | - |
| No PTB | 12 | 21.82% | - | - | - | - |
| Mass (in kg) | - | - | 73.7 | - | 15.99 | - |
| Height (in cm) | - | - | 162.55 | - | 7.93 | - |
| Age (in years) | - | - | - | 38 | - | 21–65 |
| BMI | - | - | - | 26 | - | 17.08–60.23 |
| Income per person in household (in ZAR) | - | - | - | R288.89 | - | R0–3600 |
Source: Authors’ own work
PTB, pulmonary tuberculosis; *, Normally distributed data represented as mean and SD Non-parametric data represented as median and range.
FEV1 % predicted regressional analysis with 4 outliers removed and forward stepwise analysis.
| SE of | SE of | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | - | - | 94.19 | 3.008 | 31.31 | 0 |
| Current TB: no = 0, yes = 1 | -0.524 | 0.13 | -23.39 | 5.786 | -4.04 | 0.0002 |
| Previous TB: no = 0, yes = 1 | -0.296 | 0.13 | -11.76 | 5.148 | -2.28 | 0.027 |
Source: Authors’ own work
Regression summary for dependent variable: FEV1 % Pred. R = 0.51756752; R² = 0.26787614; Adjusted R² = 0.23737097.
F = 8.7813; df = 2.48; p < 0.00056; SE: 15.631.
FVC % predicted regressional analysis with 3 outliers removed and forward stepwise analysis.
| SE of | SE of | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | - | - | 90.54 | 4412 | 20.52 | 0 |
| Current TB: no = 0, yes = 1 | -0.41 | 0.134 | -15.99 | 5211 | -3.07 | 0.004 |
| Previous TB: no = 0, yes = 1 | -0.293 | 0.132 | -10.79 | 4853 | -2.22 | 0.031 |
| Sex: m = 0, f = 1 | 0.213 | 0.129 | 7.66 | 4631 | 1.65 | 0.104 |
Source: Authors’ own work
Regression summary for dependent variable: FVC % Pred. R = 0.49652264; R² = 0.24653473; Adjusted R² = 0.19944316.
F = 5.2352; df = 3.48; p < 0.00331; SE of estimate: 14.399.
FEV1:FVC regressional analysis with 3 outliers removed and forward stepwise analysis.
| SE of | SE of | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | - | - | 93.77 | 4.403 | 21.3 | 0 |
| Age | -0.323 | 0.128 | -0.26 | 0.104 | -2.53 | 0.015 |
| Current TB: no = 0, yes = 1 | -0.332 | 0.134 | -6.44 | 2.598 | -2.48 | 0.017 |
| Previous TB: no = 0, yes = 1 | -0.259 | 0.134 | -4.88 | 2.528 | -1.93 | 0.059 |
Source: Authors’ own work
Regression summary for dependent variable: FEV1:FVC R = 0.47374617; R² = 0.22443544; Adjusted R² = 0.17596265.
F = 4.6301; df = 3.48; p < 0.00635; SE of estimate: 7.4795.