| Literature DB >> 30135369 |
Abhimanyu Mahajan1, Andrew Zillgitt2, Abdullah Alshammaa3, Neepa Patel4, Christos Sidiropoulos5, Peter A LeWitt6, Susan Bowyer7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cervical dystonia (CD) patients have impaired working memory, processing speed and visual-motor integration ability. We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to investigate changes in cerebral oscillations in CD patients during an executive function test, before and after administration of botulinum toxin.Entities:
Keywords: botulinum toxin; cervical dystonia; executive function; functional imaging; magnetoencephalography
Year: 2018 PMID: 30135369 PMCID: PMC6162734 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci8090159
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Sci ISSN: 2076-3425
Patient demographics and clinical characteristics.
| Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | Patient 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 53 | 53 | 55 | 60 | 32 |
| Gender | Female | Female | Male | Female | Female |
| Onset of symptoms | January 2016 | February 2017 | July 2015 | March 1996 | November 2015 |
| Diagnosis | Cervical dystonia | Cervical dystonia | Cervical dystonia | Cervical dystonia | Cervical dystonia |
| Pharmacotherapy | Botulinum toxin type A | Botulinum toxin type A | Botulinum toxin type A | Botulinum toxin type A | Botulinum toxin type A |
| Description of dystonia | “right sided rotation and left sided bending” | “left torticollis and slight anterocollis with a slight no-no dystonic head tremor” | “Left torticollis with mild retrocollis and left shoulder elevation with dystonic tremor” | “right laterocollis and left torticollis with dystonic tremor” | “right torticollis with mixed “yes-yes” and “no-no” head tremor” |
| Type A toxin administered | 150 units | 250 units | 280 units | 200 units | 280 units |
Figure 1As part of the visual continuous performance test (CPT) test, subjects are instructed to respond as quickly as possible by pressing a button when the “X” target stimulus followed the “A” cue stimulus. This figure represents the trigger/stimulus and the latency in response (pressing the button) by the subject.
Figure 2Difference in coherence between patients and controls pre- and post-botulinum toxin. The number signifies the number of significant networks with a large effect size within a given pathway.
Figure 3Patient 4, Magnetoencephalography (MEG) images with visual CPT, pre and post botulinum toxin. Regions of the brain that are statistically significantly different in this subject pre- (green) and post- (red) botulinum toxin medication. Red areas indicate where more coherent activity was seen after treatment. Green areas had higher coherence prior to treatment.